Dynamic Stakeholder Analysis Through Process Mapping

IF 3.1 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Paul Rouse, Omid Sherkat, Winnie O'Grady
{"title":"Dynamic Stakeholder Analysis Through Process Mapping","authors":"Paul Rouse,&nbsp;Omid Sherkat,&nbsp;Winnie O'Grady","doi":"10.1111/faam.12422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Identification of stakeholders and their importance is critical to the design of accountability and performance management systems. Conventional stakeholder analysis approaches provide a static view of stakeholders and overlook that accountability is a dynamic process encompassing multiple temporally separated (or distinct) stages. We approach stakeholder analysis from a process perspective to ensure a more complete identification of stakeholders and to capture the dynamic nature of stakeholder emergence, retirement, and changes in relative importance. We used a participatory action research methodology to investigate contracting services in a community health setting and employed process mapping to reveal contracting activities undertaken in sequential stages of Deming's Plan–Do–Check–Act (PDCA) cycle. Stakeholders engage at different stages with different activities of a process so that in multi-stage processes, stakeholder analysis needs to be repeated at each stage and is specific to each stage. Our use of the PDCA is broader than traditional applications and provides a suitable framework for a more complete identification of stakeholders across the entire process while aligning well with accountability and management control notions. The contribution is an approach that not only better identifies stakeholders but also recognizes the dynamics of multi-stage processes for stakeholder interest and influence. The recurring nature of many processes (such as contracting) implies that roles remain the same even if an organization is restructured so that process mapping will still identify roles and stakeholders. This approach can be used by other organizations to better identify stakeholders and their dynamics in the planning and delivery processes.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47120,"journal":{"name":"Financial Accountability & Management","volume":"41 2","pages":"398-418"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Financial Accountability & Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/faam.12422","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Identification of stakeholders and their importance is critical to the design of accountability and performance management systems. Conventional stakeholder analysis approaches provide a static view of stakeholders and overlook that accountability is a dynamic process encompassing multiple temporally separated (or distinct) stages. We approach stakeholder analysis from a process perspective to ensure a more complete identification of stakeholders and to capture the dynamic nature of stakeholder emergence, retirement, and changes in relative importance. We used a participatory action research methodology to investigate contracting services in a community health setting and employed process mapping to reveal contracting activities undertaken in sequential stages of Deming's Plan–Do–Check–Act (PDCA) cycle. Stakeholders engage at different stages with different activities of a process so that in multi-stage processes, stakeholder analysis needs to be repeated at each stage and is specific to each stage. Our use of the PDCA is broader than traditional applications and provides a suitable framework for a more complete identification of stakeholders across the entire process while aligning well with accountability and management control notions. The contribution is an approach that not only better identifies stakeholders but also recognizes the dynamics of multi-stage processes for stakeholder interest and influence. The recurring nature of many processes (such as contracting) implies that roles remain the same even if an organization is restructured so that process mapping will still identify roles and stakeholders. This approach can be used by other organizations to better identify stakeholders and their dynamics in the planning and delivery processes.

通过流程制图进行动态利益相关者分析
识别利益相关者及其重要性对于设计问责制和绩效管理系统至关重要。传统的利益相关者分析方法提供了利益相关者的静态视图,忽略了问责制是一个动态过程,包含多个时间分离(或不同)的阶段。我们从过程的角度进行干系人分析,以确保更完整地识别干系人,并捕捉干系人出现、退休和相对重要性变化的动态性质。我们使用参与式行动研究方法来调查社区卫生环境中的承包服务,并使用过程映射来揭示在戴明计划-执行-检查-行动(PDCA)循环的连续阶段进行的承包活动。干系人在不同阶段参与过程的不同活动,因此在多阶段过程中,干系人分析需要在每个阶段重复,并且是针对每个阶段的。我们对PDCA的使用比传统的应用更广泛,并提供了一个合适的框架,以便在整个过程中更完整地识别涉众,同时与问责制和管理控制概念保持一致。其贡献是一种方法,不仅更好地识别利益相关者,而且认识到利益相关者利益和影响的多阶段过程的动态。许多过程(例如契约)的重复性质意味着,即使组织进行了重组,以便过程映射仍然可以识别角色和涉众,角色仍然是相同的。其他组织可以使用这种方法来更好地识别涉众及其在计划和交付过程中的动态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
18.20%
发文量
27
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信