Employing large language models safely and effectively as a practicing neurosurgeon

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Advait Patil, Paul Serrato, Gracie Cleaver, Daniela Limbania, Alfred Pokmeng See, Kevin T. Huang
{"title":"Employing large language models safely and effectively as a practicing neurosurgeon","authors":"Advait Patil,&nbsp;Paul Serrato,&nbsp;Gracie Cleaver,&nbsp;Daniela Limbania,&nbsp;Alfred Pokmeng See,&nbsp;Kevin T. Huang","doi":"10.1007/s00701-025-06515-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated significant capabilities to date in working with a neurosurgical knowledge-base and have the potential to enhance neurosurgical practice and education. However, their role in the clinical workspace is still being actively explored. As many neurosurgeons seek to incorporate this technology into their local practice environments, we explore pertinent questions about how to deploy these systems in a safe and efficacious manner.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>The authors performed a literature search of LLM studies in neurosurgery in the PubMed database (“LLM” and “neurosurgery”). Papers were reviewed for LLM use cases, considerations taken for selection of specific LLMs, and challenges encountered, including processing of private health information.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>The authors provide a review of core principles underpinning model selection, including technical considerations such as model access, context windows, multimodality, retrieval-augmented generation, and benchmark performance, as well as relative advantages of current LLMs. Additionally, the authors discuss safety considerations and paths for institutional support in safe LLM inference on private health data. The resulting discussion forms a framework for key dimensions neurosurgeons employing LLMs should consider.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>LLMs present promising opportunities to advance neurosurgical practice, but their clinical adoption necessitates careful consideration of technical, ethical, and regulatory hurdles. By thoughtfully evaluating model selection, deployment approaches, and compliance requirements, neurosurgeons can leverage the benefits of LLMs while minimizing potential risks.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7370,"journal":{"name":"Acta Neurochirurgica","volume":"167 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00701-025-06515-6.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Neurochirurgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00701-025-06515-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated significant capabilities to date in working with a neurosurgical knowledge-base and have the potential to enhance neurosurgical practice and education. However, their role in the clinical workspace is still being actively explored. As many neurosurgeons seek to incorporate this technology into their local practice environments, we explore pertinent questions about how to deploy these systems in a safe and efficacious manner.

Methods

The authors performed a literature search of LLM studies in neurosurgery in the PubMed database (“LLM” and “neurosurgery”). Papers were reviewed for LLM use cases, considerations taken for selection of specific LLMs, and challenges encountered, including processing of private health information.

Results

The authors provide a review of core principles underpinning model selection, including technical considerations such as model access, context windows, multimodality, retrieval-augmented generation, and benchmark performance, as well as relative advantages of current LLMs. Additionally, the authors discuss safety considerations and paths for institutional support in safe LLM inference on private health data. The resulting discussion forms a framework for key dimensions neurosurgeons employing LLMs should consider.

Conclusions

LLMs present promising opportunities to advance neurosurgical practice, but their clinical adoption necessitates careful consideration of technical, ethical, and regulatory hurdles. By thoughtfully evaluating model selection, deployment approaches, and compliance requirements, neurosurgeons can leverage the benefits of LLMs while minimizing potential risks.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Neurochirurgica
Acta Neurochirurgica 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
342
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The journal "Acta Neurochirurgica" publishes only original papers useful both to research and clinical work. Papers should deal with clinical neurosurgery - diagnosis and diagnostic techniques, operative surgery and results, postoperative treatment - or with research work in neuroscience if the underlying questions or the results are of neurosurgical interest. Reports on congresses are given in brief accounts. As official organ of the European Association of Neurosurgical Societies the journal publishes all announcements of the E.A.N.S. and reports on the activities of its member societies. Only contributions written in English will be accepted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信