Is usability testing valid with prototypes where clickable hotspots are highlighted upon misclick?

IF 3.7 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
Matus Krajcovic , Peter Demcak , Eduard Kuric
{"title":"Is usability testing valid with prototypes where clickable hotspots are highlighted upon misclick?","authors":"Matus Krajcovic ,&nbsp;Peter Demcak ,&nbsp;Eduard Kuric","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2025.112446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In user experience design, prototypes are an indispensable tool for early diagnosis of usability issues. Designing usability testing to accommodate a prototype’s limited interactivity is essential to obtain relevant participant feedback. Hotspot Highlighting is a technique employed by all prominent prototyping tools to allow usability testers to see which areas of the prototype are clickable. The current body of knowledge lacks definite answers on how highlighting impacts usability testing results, compared to scenarios where participants complete tasks fully on their own. Can studies be treated the same, regardless of whether Hotspot Highlighting is enabled? What are the recommendations for how and when Hotspot Highlighting can or should be used? To investigate, we conduct a between-subjects experiment with 80 participants and 240 task completions in which we compare user behavior depending on the presence of Hotspot Highlighting. Its results indicate that Hotspot Highlighting can affect participant behavior before and after a highlight is displayed, leading to potentially different usability findings if left unaccounted for. The guidance of highlights changes the targets of clicks and encourages cognitively efficient finding of solutions by intentionally triggering the highlights. Considering the potential of Hotspot Highlighting to facilitate the usability testing of prototypes with limited interactivity, we discuss potential adaptations of the technique that address its current issues for more methodologically sound usability evaluation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Systems and Software","volume":"226 ","pages":"Article 112446"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Systems and Software","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0164121225001141","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In user experience design, prototypes are an indispensable tool for early diagnosis of usability issues. Designing usability testing to accommodate a prototype’s limited interactivity is essential to obtain relevant participant feedback. Hotspot Highlighting is a technique employed by all prominent prototyping tools to allow usability testers to see which areas of the prototype are clickable. The current body of knowledge lacks definite answers on how highlighting impacts usability testing results, compared to scenarios where participants complete tasks fully on their own. Can studies be treated the same, regardless of whether Hotspot Highlighting is enabled? What are the recommendations for how and when Hotspot Highlighting can or should be used? To investigate, we conduct a between-subjects experiment with 80 participants and 240 task completions in which we compare user behavior depending on the presence of Hotspot Highlighting. Its results indicate that Hotspot Highlighting can affect participant behavior before and after a highlight is displayed, leading to potentially different usability findings if left unaccounted for. The guidance of highlights changes the targets of clicks and encourages cognitively efficient finding of solutions by intentionally triggering the highlights. Considering the potential of Hotspot Highlighting to facilitate the usability testing of prototypes with limited interactivity, we discuss potential adaptations of the technique that address its current issues for more methodologically sound usability evaluation.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Systems and Software
Journal of Systems and Software 工程技术-计算机:理论方法
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
5.70%
发文量
193
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Systems and Software publishes papers covering all aspects of software engineering and related hardware-software-systems issues. All articles should include a validation of the idea presented, e.g. through case studies, experiments, or systematic comparisons with other approaches already in practice. Topics of interest include, but are not limited to: •Methods and tools for, and empirical studies on, software requirements, design, architecture, verification and validation, maintenance and evolution •Agile, model-driven, service-oriented, open source and global software development •Approaches for mobile, multiprocessing, real-time, distributed, cloud-based, dependable and virtualized systems •Human factors and management concerns of software development •Data management and big data issues of software systems •Metrics and evaluation, data mining of software development resources •Business and economic aspects of software development processes The journal welcomes state-of-the-art surveys and reports of practical experience for all of these topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信