High mimic rate among recipients of intravenous thrombolysis for acute minor ischemic stroke presenting with disabling symptoms

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Saira Afzal, Pramit Mukherjee, Metin Bicen, Mark Orlando, Chetna Dengri, Dixie Reinoso, Ahmed Koriesh, Amre Nouh
{"title":"High mimic rate among recipients of intravenous thrombolysis for acute minor ischemic stroke presenting with disabling symptoms","authors":"Saira Afzal,&nbsp;Pramit Mukherjee,&nbsp;Metin Bicen,&nbsp;Mark Orlando,&nbsp;Chetna Dengri,&nbsp;Dixie Reinoso,&nbsp;Ahmed Koriesh,&nbsp;Amre Nouh","doi":"10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2025.108298","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Patients with minor acute ischemic stroke, defined as having an NIHSS score of ≤5, and presenting with disabling symptoms are routinely administered intravenous (IV) thrombolytics. Our study aimed to assess the prevalence of stroke mimics among these patients and compare the characteristics between stroke mimics and true strokes in those who received thrombolytic therapy. Additionally, we evaluated the safety of thrombolytic therapy in stroke mimic patients.</div></div><div><h3>Observation</h3><div>This single-center, retrospective study reviewed patients with NIHSS scores of ≤5 and disabling symptoms who received IV thrombolytics for suspected acute ischemic stroke from March 2018 to March 2023. Univariate analysis compared demographics and characteristics between stroke and stroke mimic groups using Chi-square or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables and Wilcoxon's rank-sum test for continuous variables. Among 61 patients identified, 29 % (n = 18) were classified as stroke mimics. There were no significant differences in age, gender, presenting symptoms. Hypertension, hyperlipidemia and diabetes mellitus was more predominant among stroke patients. Although not statistically significant, the rate of adverse events was higher among stroke patients compared to stroke mimics (9 % vs 0 %, p = 0.30). One patient developed symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage, two patients experienced asymptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage and one patient had gross hematuria while no adverse events were observed in the stroke mimic group. Stroke mimics were more likely to achieve a good functional outcome at discharge (mRS &lt;1) compared to stroke patients (89 % vs 37 %, p = 0.008). The final discharge diagnoses for stroke mimics included migraine(50 %), toxic-metabolic encephalopathy (27 %), seizures (17 %) and somatoform disorders (5 %). None of the stroke mimic patients experienced adverse events post-IV thrombolysis. In contrast, 1 stroke patient (2 %) developed symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, two patients (4.6 %) had asymptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and one patient(2 %) had minor extracranial bleeding (gross hematuria)</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The high percentage of stroke mimics among patients with NIHSS ≤5 despite disabling features suggests a need for improved diagnostic tools to distinguish true strokes from mimics. Importantly, thrombolytic therapy was not associated with significant adverse events in stroke mimic patients, who had a better functional outcome at discharge.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54368,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Stroke & Cerebrovascular Diseases","volume":"34 6","pages":"Article 108298"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Stroke & Cerebrovascular Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1052305725000771","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Patients with minor acute ischemic stroke, defined as having an NIHSS score of ≤5, and presenting with disabling symptoms are routinely administered intravenous (IV) thrombolytics. Our study aimed to assess the prevalence of stroke mimics among these patients and compare the characteristics between stroke mimics and true strokes in those who received thrombolytic therapy. Additionally, we evaluated the safety of thrombolytic therapy in stroke mimic patients.

Observation

This single-center, retrospective study reviewed patients with NIHSS scores of ≤5 and disabling symptoms who received IV thrombolytics for suspected acute ischemic stroke from March 2018 to March 2023. Univariate analysis compared demographics and characteristics between stroke and stroke mimic groups using Chi-square or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables and Wilcoxon's rank-sum test for continuous variables. Among 61 patients identified, 29 % (n = 18) were classified as stroke mimics. There were no significant differences in age, gender, presenting symptoms. Hypertension, hyperlipidemia and diabetes mellitus was more predominant among stroke patients. Although not statistically significant, the rate of adverse events was higher among stroke patients compared to stroke mimics (9 % vs 0 %, p = 0.30). One patient developed symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage, two patients experienced asymptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage and one patient had gross hematuria while no adverse events were observed in the stroke mimic group. Stroke mimics were more likely to achieve a good functional outcome at discharge (mRS <1) compared to stroke patients (89 % vs 37 %, p = 0.008). The final discharge diagnoses for stroke mimics included migraine(50 %), toxic-metabolic encephalopathy (27 %), seizures (17 %) and somatoform disorders (5 %). None of the stroke mimic patients experienced adverse events post-IV thrombolysis. In contrast, 1 stroke patient (2 %) developed symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, two patients (4.6 %) had asymptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and one patient(2 %) had minor extracranial bleeding (gross hematuria)

Conclusions

The high percentage of stroke mimics among patients with NIHSS ≤5 despite disabling features suggests a need for improved diagnostic tools to distinguish true strokes from mimics. Importantly, thrombolytic therapy was not associated with significant adverse events in stroke mimic patients, who had a better functional outcome at discharge.
静脉溶栓治疗伴有致残症状的急性轻度缺血性卒中患者的高模拟率
背景:定义为NIHSS评分≤5,并出现致残症状的轻微急性缺血性卒中患者常规静脉溶栓治疗。我们的研究旨在评估这些患者中卒中模拟的患病率,并比较接受溶栓治疗的患者中卒中模拟和真卒中的特征。此外,我们评估了脑卒中模拟患者溶栓治疗的安全性。观察:本单中心、回顾性研究回顾了2018年3月至2023年3月期间,NIHSS评分≤5分且有致残症状且因疑似急性缺血性卒中而接受静脉溶栓治疗的患者。单因素分析比较中风和中风模拟组之间的人口统计学和特征,对分类变量使用卡方或Fisher精确检验,对连续变量使用Wilcoxon秩和检验。在确定的61例患者中,29% (n=18)被归类为卒中模拟。年龄、性别、表现症状无显著差异。卒中患者以高血压、高脂血症和糖尿病为主。虽然没有统计学意义,但卒中患者的不良事件发生率高于卒中模拟患者(9% vs 0%, p=0.30)。卒中模拟组1例出现症状性脑出血,2例出现无症状性脑出血,1例出现肉眼血尿,无不良事件发生。卒中模拟患者出院时更有可能获得良好的功能预后(mRS
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
4.00%
发文量
583
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Stroke & Cerebrovascular Diseases publishes original papers on basic and clinical science related to the fields of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases. The Journal also features review articles, controversies, methods and technical notes, selected case reports and other original articles of special nature. Its editorial mission is to focus on prevention and repair of cerebrovascular disease. Clinical papers emphasize medical and surgical aspects of stroke, clinical trials and design, epidemiology, stroke care delivery systems and outcomes, imaging sciences and rehabilitation of stroke. The Journal will be of special interest to specialists involved in caring for patients with cerebrovascular disease, including neurologists, neurosurgeons and cardiologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信