Beyond the Clinic: A Social Media Network Analysis of 5466 Posts Reveals the Interconnected Challenges Facing Sarcoma Patients.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Daniel Schneider, Ethan D L Brown, Jacob Gluski, Akash Mishra, Daniel M Sciubba, Sheng-Fu L Lo
{"title":"Beyond the Clinic: A Social Media Network Analysis of 5466 Posts Reveals the Interconnected Challenges Facing Sarcoma Patients.","authors":"Daniel Schneider, Ethan D L Brown, Jacob Gluski, Akash Mishra, Daniel M Sciubba, Sheng-Fu L Lo","doi":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Social media platforms have increasingly been investigated as a source of patient perspectives that may not emerge in clinical settings. This study aimed to explore how disease status, treatment, and the patient experience interconnect for sarcoma patients posting on a major social media platform.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic thematic analysis of 5466 posts across 7 health-related subreddits using a framework of 6 major categories: physical symptoms, disease status, treatments, psychosocial impact, support systems, and daily life impact. Theme detection utilized regular expression matching across 27 subthemes, while VADER sentiment analysis assessed emotional valence. The statistical analysis examined theme co-occurrences using Fisher exact tests and sentiment patterns using Mann-Whitney U tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Treatment-related discussions dominated the discourse, with chemotherapy (65.6%) and radiation therapy (60.2%) strongly associated with work-related impacts (OR=2.85 and 2.47, respectively; all OR P<0.001). Financial discussions and work-related posts demonstrated the highest user engagement. Disease progression was a critical transition point, demonstrating robust relationships with treatment modalities (chemotherapy: OR=3.12; radiation: OR=4.09), anxiety (OR=2.23), and uncertainty (OR=2.13). Support-seeking behavior (34.9%) was positively associated with medical team interactions (OR=2.16). Physical symptoms exhibited negative sentiment (-0.331±0.154), particularly discussions of weakness (-0.589) and breathing difficulties (-0.308). Hope-related discussions showed more positive sentiment than other psychosocial themes (Cohen d=-0.595, P<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This network analysis reveals critical intersections between treatment decisions, financial concerns, and work impact within sarcoma care. Integrated support interventions that address both clinical and practical challenges-particularly treatment transitions and financial toxicity-may improve patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":50812,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/COC.0000000000001191","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Social media platforms have increasingly been investigated as a source of patient perspectives that may not emerge in clinical settings. This study aimed to explore how disease status, treatment, and the patient experience interconnect for sarcoma patients posting on a major social media platform.

Methods: We conducted a systematic thematic analysis of 5466 posts across 7 health-related subreddits using a framework of 6 major categories: physical symptoms, disease status, treatments, psychosocial impact, support systems, and daily life impact. Theme detection utilized regular expression matching across 27 subthemes, while VADER sentiment analysis assessed emotional valence. The statistical analysis examined theme co-occurrences using Fisher exact tests and sentiment patterns using Mann-Whitney U tests.

Results: Treatment-related discussions dominated the discourse, with chemotherapy (65.6%) and radiation therapy (60.2%) strongly associated with work-related impacts (OR=2.85 and 2.47, respectively; all OR P<0.001). Financial discussions and work-related posts demonstrated the highest user engagement. Disease progression was a critical transition point, demonstrating robust relationships with treatment modalities (chemotherapy: OR=3.12; radiation: OR=4.09), anxiety (OR=2.23), and uncertainty (OR=2.13). Support-seeking behavior (34.9%) was positively associated with medical team interactions (OR=2.16). Physical symptoms exhibited negative sentiment (-0.331±0.154), particularly discussions of weakness (-0.589) and breathing difficulties (-0.308). Hope-related discussions showed more positive sentiment than other psychosocial themes (Cohen d=-0.595, P<0.001).

Conclusions: This network analysis reveals critical intersections between treatment decisions, financial concerns, and work impact within sarcoma care. Integrated support interventions that address both clinical and practical challenges-particularly treatment transitions and financial toxicity-may improve patient care.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
130
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​​American Journal of Clinical Oncology is a multidisciplinary journal for cancer surgeons, radiation oncologists, medical oncologists, GYN oncologists, and pediatric oncologists. The emphasis of AJCO is on combined modality multidisciplinary loco-regional management of cancer. The journal also gives emphasis to translational research, outcome studies, and cost utility analyses, and includes opinion pieces and review articles. The editorial board includes a large number of distinguished surgeons, radiation oncologists, medical oncologists, GYN oncologists, pediatric oncologists, and others who are internationally recognized for expertise in their fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信