Retrofit or misfit? Exploring the impact of bathroom microenvironments on older adults with functional limitations in retrofitted senior living facilities.
{"title":"Retrofit or misfit? Exploring the impact of bathroom microenvironments on older adults with functional limitations in retrofitted senior living facilities.","authors":"Shi Yin Chee","doi":"10.1080/17483107.2025.2489787","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>How well can older adults adapt to retrofitted spaces that were never designed to meet their evolving needs? Retrofitted senior living facilities often magnify safety risks that purpose-built environments are specifically designed to mitigate, forcing older adults with functional limitations to contend with bathroom spaces ill-suited to their needs. Among these, bathroom microenvironments stand out as critical zones of vulnerability, warranting immediate investigation.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study explored the lived experiences of older adults with functional limitations in retrofitted senior living facilities, specifically focusing on how bathroom microenvironments unique to these settings impact their safety, autonomy, and fall risks.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In-depth, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 14 older adults in four urban senior living facilities. Moustakas' transcendental phenomenology and the Modified Stevick-Colaizzi-Keen method were employed to analyze the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four primary themes emerged: navigating bathroom barriers, psychological strain in daily navigation, safety through adaptation, and economic and cultural barriers to bathroom safety. The findings expose a stark reality: retrofitted senior living facilities frequently fail to meet the safety and accessibility needs of older adults, forcing them to adapt to spaces that compromise both their dignity and independence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These systemic shortcomings in bathroom microenvironments highlight a critical focus for retrofitting efforts: functionality, safety, and the evolving needs of older adults to create environments that promote autonomy and reduce fall risks. Anything less is not just a missed opportunity-it is a failure to respect the fundamental rights and well-being of an aging population.</p>","PeriodicalId":47806,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2025.2489787","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: How well can older adults adapt to retrofitted spaces that were never designed to meet their evolving needs? Retrofitted senior living facilities often magnify safety risks that purpose-built environments are specifically designed to mitigate, forcing older adults with functional limitations to contend with bathroom spaces ill-suited to their needs. Among these, bathroom microenvironments stand out as critical zones of vulnerability, warranting immediate investigation.
Purpose: This study explored the lived experiences of older adults with functional limitations in retrofitted senior living facilities, specifically focusing on how bathroom microenvironments unique to these settings impact their safety, autonomy, and fall risks.
Methods: In-depth, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 14 older adults in four urban senior living facilities. Moustakas' transcendental phenomenology and the Modified Stevick-Colaizzi-Keen method were employed to analyze the data.
Results: Four primary themes emerged: navigating bathroom barriers, psychological strain in daily navigation, safety through adaptation, and economic and cultural barriers to bathroom safety. The findings expose a stark reality: retrofitted senior living facilities frequently fail to meet the safety and accessibility needs of older adults, forcing them to adapt to spaces that compromise both their dignity and independence.
Conclusion: These systemic shortcomings in bathroom microenvironments highlight a critical focus for retrofitting efforts: functionality, safety, and the evolving needs of older adults to create environments that promote autonomy and reduce fall risks. Anything less is not just a missed opportunity-it is a failure to respect the fundamental rights and well-being of an aging population.