[Evaluation and comparison of visual acuity measurement methods in developing C57BL/6J mice].

Q3 Medicine
X C Wang, X L Liu, Y T Guo, W Zhang
{"title":"[Evaluation and comparison of visual acuity measurement methods in developing C57BL/6J mice].","authors":"X C Wang, X L Liu, Y T Guo, W Zhang","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn112142-20240428-00200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To investigate the developmental characteristics of visual acuity in C57BL/6J mice and to evaluate the consistency and reliability of different measurement methods. <b>Methods:</b> This was an experimental study. One hundred and seventy-two C57BL/6J mice were divided into eight groups based on postnatal days (P): P13/14 (first day of eye opening,18 mice), P15 (11 mice), P16 (10 mice), P18 (21 mice), P21 (onset of the critical period for visual development, 29 mice), P28 (peak of the critical period, 28 mice), P35 (end of the critical period, 25 mice), and P60 (adulthood, 30 mice). Visual acuity was assessed using three methods: visual evoked potentials (VEP), the optomotor reflex (OMR) task, and the visual water task (VWT). Statistical analyses were conducted using the least significant difference <i>t</i>-test, one-way ANOVA, and independent sample <i>t</i>-tests. <b>Results:</b> VEP measurements of monocular visual acuity showed that the visual acuity in the P13/14 group was (0.20±0.06) cycles per degree (cpd), and increased to (0.44±0.08) cpd in the P21 group and (0.52±0.06) cpd in the P35 group, with significant differences between groups (all <i>P</i><0.05). The visual acuity in the P60 group was (0.56±0.05) cpd, which was not significantly different from that in the P35 group (<i>P</i>>0.05). For binocular visual acuity assessed by the OMR task, the P13/14 group had a visual acuity of (0.11±0.06) cpd, which increased to (0.20±0.07) cpd in the P15 group, (0.35±0.05) cpd in the P16 group, (0.40±0.05) cpd in the P18 group, and (0.47±0.05) cpd in the P21 group, with significant differences between groups (all <i>P</i><0.05). The visual acuity in the P60 group was (0.50±0.05) cpd, which was not significantly different from that in the P21 group (<i>P</i>>0.05). The binocular visual acuity assessed by the VWT in the P60 group was (0.50±0.03) cpd. There was no significant difference in visual acuity measured using the three methods in the P60 group (<i>P</i>>0.05). <b>Conclusions:</b> Visual acuity in C57BL/6J mice increased rapidly from the first day of eye opening to the onset of the critical period for visual development, followed by a slower increase until adulthood. In adult C57BL/6J mice, it ranged from 0.50 to 0.56 cpd, as measured using the VEP, OMR task, and VWT, which can yield comparable and reliable results.</p>","PeriodicalId":39688,"journal":{"name":"中华眼科杂志","volume":"61 4","pages":"279-286"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华眼科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112142-20240428-00200","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the developmental characteristics of visual acuity in C57BL/6J mice and to evaluate the consistency and reliability of different measurement methods. Methods: This was an experimental study. One hundred and seventy-two C57BL/6J mice were divided into eight groups based on postnatal days (P): P13/14 (first day of eye opening,18 mice), P15 (11 mice), P16 (10 mice), P18 (21 mice), P21 (onset of the critical period for visual development, 29 mice), P28 (peak of the critical period, 28 mice), P35 (end of the critical period, 25 mice), and P60 (adulthood, 30 mice). Visual acuity was assessed using three methods: visual evoked potentials (VEP), the optomotor reflex (OMR) task, and the visual water task (VWT). Statistical analyses were conducted using the least significant difference t-test, one-way ANOVA, and independent sample t-tests. Results: VEP measurements of monocular visual acuity showed that the visual acuity in the P13/14 group was (0.20±0.06) cycles per degree (cpd), and increased to (0.44±0.08) cpd in the P21 group and (0.52±0.06) cpd in the P35 group, with significant differences between groups (all P<0.05). The visual acuity in the P60 group was (0.56±0.05) cpd, which was not significantly different from that in the P35 group (P>0.05). For binocular visual acuity assessed by the OMR task, the P13/14 group had a visual acuity of (0.11±0.06) cpd, which increased to (0.20±0.07) cpd in the P15 group, (0.35±0.05) cpd in the P16 group, (0.40±0.05) cpd in the P18 group, and (0.47±0.05) cpd in the P21 group, with significant differences between groups (all P<0.05). The visual acuity in the P60 group was (0.50±0.05) cpd, which was not significantly different from that in the P21 group (P>0.05). The binocular visual acuity assessed by the VWT in the P60 group was (0.50±0.03) cpd. There was no significant difference in visual acuity measured using the three methods in the P60 group (P>0.05). Conclusions: Visual acuity in C57BL/6J mice increased rapidly from the first day of eye opening to the onset of the critical period for visual development, followed by a slower increase until adulthood. In adult C57BL/6J mice, it ranged from 0.50 to 0.56 cpd, as measured using the VEP, OMR task, and VWT, which can yield comparable and reliable results.

[发育中的 C57BL/6J 小鼠视敏度测量方法的评估与比较]。
目的:探讨C57BL/6J小鼠的视力发育特点,评价不同测量方法的一致性和可靠性。方法:实验研究。将172只C57BL/6J小鼠按出生天数分为8组:P13/14组(睁眼第一天,18只)、P15组(11只)、P16组(10只)、P18组(21只)、P21组(视力发育关键期开始,29只)、P28组(关键期高峰期,28只)、P35组(关键期结束,25只)、P60组(成年期,30只)。采用视觉诱发电位(VEP)、视运动反射(OMR)任务和视觉水任务(VWT)三种方法评估视力。统计分析采用最小显著差异t检验、单因素方差分析和独立样本t检验。结果:单眼视力VEP测量显示,P13/14组视力为(0.20±0.06)个周期/度(cpd), P21组为(0.44±0.08)个周期/度(cpd), P35组为(0.52±0.06)个周期/度(cpd),组间差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。OMR任务评估双眼视力时,P13/14组视力为(0.11±0.06)cpd, P15组为(0.20±0.07)cpd, P16组为(0.35±0.05)cpd, P18组为(0.40±0.05)cpd, P21组为(0.47±0.05)cpd,组间差异均有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。P60组双眼视力VWT评分为(0.50±0.03)cpd。P60组三种方法测得的视力差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论:C57BL/6J小鼠的视力从睁眼第一天到视力发育关键期开始迅速增加,随后缓慢增加,直至成年。在成年C57BL/6J小鼠中,通过VEP, OMR任务和VWT测量,其范围为0.50至0.56 cpd,可以得出可比较且可靠的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
中华眼科杂志
中华眼科杂志 Medicine-Ophthalmology
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12700
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信