Porous threaded titanium implant screws have higher insertional torque compared to standard screws.

IF 1.4 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Andrew P Collins, Stephen J Wallace, Graham J DeKeyser, David W Polly, Reza Firoozabadi
{"title":"Porous threaded titanium implant screws have higher insertional torque compared to standard screws.","authors":"Andrew P Collins, Stephen J Wallace, Graham J DeKeyser, David W Polly, Reza Firoozabadi","doi":"10.1007/s00590-025-04279-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Posterior pelvic ring screw back out and loss of fixation may result from poor screw purchase, prevalent in geriatric pelvic ring injuries where the cancellous bone is often osteoporotic. To reduce screw back out, there has been increasing use of porous threaded titanium implant (PTTI) screws for posterior pelvic fixation rather than standard cannulated, buttress threaded screws. This study aims to assess the insertional torque of PTTI screws compared to standard cannulated screws as there is limited evidence regarding the biomechanical fixation profiles among screws.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifteen orthopedic trauma surgeons inserted screws into a validated surrogate for osteoporotic cancellous bone. Insertional torque was measured during screw placement in three separate scenarios for each surgeon: (1) placement of a standard 7.3 mm (mm) screw into a new bone model, (2) placement of a PTTI screw into a new bone model, and (3) placement of a PTTI screw through a previously placed 7.3 mm screw hole from which it was removed (rescue screw). The insertional torque was calculated across all surgeons and analyses were conducted comparing scenarios (1) and (2), and (1) and (3).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average insertional torque of 7.3 mm screws was 0.358 ± 0.223 Nm, and the maximum insertional torque was 0.627 ± 0.365 Nm. The average insertional torque for the PTTI screws was 0.929 ± 0.551 Nm, 2.59 times more than that of the 7.3 mm screw (p < 0.001) while the maximum insertional torque was 1.877 ± 0.671 Nm, 2.99 times that of the standard screw (p < 0.001). When placed into the prior 7.3 mm screw hole (rescue), the PTTI screws generated an average insertional torque of 0.711 ± 0.405, still 1.99 times greater than that of the 7.3 mm screw (p < 0.001), and maximum torque of 1.607 ± 0.427 Nm, 2.56 times greater than the standard screw (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Significantly greater maximum and average insertional torque were generated with the PTTI screws compared to the standard screws, even when used as a rescue screw in cancellous bone models. Further studies assessing clinical outcomes and failure rates with PTTI screws will better define their clinical utility.</p>","PeriodicalId":50484,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology","volume":"35 1","pages":"150"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-025-04279-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Posterior pelvic ring screw back out and loss of fixation may result from poor screw purchase, prevalent in geriatric pelvic ring injuries where the cancellous bone is often osteoporotic. To reduce screw back out, there has been increasing use of porous threaded titanium implant (PTTI) screws for posterior pelvic fixation rather than standard cannulated, buttress threaded screws. This study aims to assess the insertional torque of PTTI screws compared to standard cannulated screws as there is limited evidence regarding the biomechanical fixation profiles among screws.

Methods: Fifteen orthopedic trauma surgeons inserted screws into a validated surrogate for osteoporotic cancellous bone. Insertional torque was measured during screw placement in three separate scenarios for each surgeon: (1) placement of a standard 7.3 mm (mm) screw into a new bone model, (2) placement of a PTTI screw into a new bone model, and (3) placement of a PTTI screw through a previously placed 7.3 mm screw hole from which it was removed (rescue screw). The insertional torque was calculated across all surgeons and analyses were conducted comparing scenarios (1) and (2), and (1) and (3).

Results: The average insertional torque of 7.3 mm screws was 0.358 ± 0.223 Nm, and the maximum insertional torque was 0.627 ± 0.365 Nm. The average insertional torque for the PTTI screws was 0.929 ± 0.551 Nm, 2.59 times more than that of the 7.3 mm screw (p < 0.001) while the maximum insertional torque was 1.877 ± 0.671 Nm, 2.99 times that of the standard screw (p < 0.001). When placed into the prior 7.3 mm screw hole (rescue), the PTTI screws generated an average insertional torque of 0.711 ± 0.405, still 1.99 times greater than that of the 7.3 mm screw (p < 0.001), and maximum torque of 1.607 ± 0.427 Nm, 2.56 times greater than the standard screw (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Significantly greater maximum and average insertional torque were generated with the PTTI screws compared to the standard screws, even when used as a rescue screw in cancellous bone models. Further studies assessing clinical outcomes and failure rates with PTTI screws will better define their clinical utility.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
265
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology (EJOST) aims to publish high quality Orthopedic scientific work. The objective of our journal is to disseminate meaningful, impactful, clinically relevant work from each and every region of the world, that has the potential to change and or inform clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信