Intravenous Dexamethasone Use and Outcomes in Children Hospitalized With Septic Arthritis.

Q1 Nursing
Andrew S Kern-Goldberger, Matthew Hall, Marcos Mestre, Jessica L Markham, Marie E Wang, Pratichi K Goenka, Laura H Brower, Alison Payson, Mary Villani, Jaime Rice Denning, Samir S Shah
{"title":"Intravenous Dexamethasone Use and Outcomes in Children Hospitalized With Septic Arthritis.","authors":"Andrew S Kern-Goldberger, Matthew Hall, Marcos Mestre, Jessica L Markham, Marie E Wang, Pratichi K Goenka, Laura H Brower, Alison Payson, Mary Villani, Jaime Rice Denning, Samir S Shah","doi":"10.1542/hpeds.2024-008047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Septic arthritis is routinely treated with joint drainage and antibiotics; however, adjunctive systemic corticosteroids may improve outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To (1) describe variation in intravenous dexamethasone use and (2) evaluate the association of intravenous dexamethasone use with outcomes among children hospitalized with septic arthritis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective cohort study of hospitalized children using the Pediatric Health Information System database. We identified intravenous dexamethasone use (on hospital days 0-2) in children with an International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision discharge code for septic arthritis (M00.x). The primary outcome was hospital length of stay (LOS). Secondary outcomes included costs, postdrainage imaging, opioid use, repeat drainage procedures, and 30-day emergency department or hospital revisits. We used propensity score matching to account for measured differences between dexamethasone recipients and nonrecipients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 3524 hospitalizations across 47 hospitals from 2016 to 2020. The median rate of dexamethasone use across hospitals was 28% (IQR, 19%-44%). In the propensity-matched cohort, dexamethasone was associated with shorter LOS (100.5 vs 114.3 hours, P < .001) and lower costs ($16 660 vs $18 243, P = .01) but greater opioid use (odds ratio [OR], 3.80; 95% CI, 1.49-9.70; P < .01). There were no significant differences in 30-day revisits (OR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.73-1.29; P = .84), postdrainage computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging (OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.71-1.15; P = .42), or repeat drainage procedures (OR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.81-1.25; P = .94).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this large cohort study, children with septic arthritis receiving dexamethasone had shorter hospital LOS and costs without higher 30-day revisit rates. Dexamethasone use varied widely across hospitals. These findings highlight the need for evaluation in a multicenter randomized trial.</p>","PeriodicalId":38180,"journal":{"name":"Hospital pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hospital pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1542/hpeds.2024-008047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Septic arthritis is routinely treated with joint drainage and antibiotics; however, adjunctive systemic corticosteroids may improve outcomes.

Objectives: To (1) describe variation in intravenous dexamethasone use and (2) evaluate the association of intravenous dexamethasone use with outcomes among children hospitalized with septic arthritis.

Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of hospitalized children using the Pediatric Health Information System database. We identified intravenous dexamethasone use (on hospital days 0-2) in children with an International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision discharge code for septic arthritis (M00.x). The primary outcome was hospital length of stay (LOS). Secondary outcomes included costs, postdrainage imaging, opioid use, repeat drainage procedures, and 30-day emergency department or hospital revisits. We used propensity score matching to account for measured differences between dexamethasone recipients and nonrecipients.

Results: We identified 3524 hospitalizations across 47 hospitals from 2016 to 2020. The median rate of dexamethasone use across hospitals was 28% (IQR, 19%-44%). In the propensity-matched cohort, dexamethasone was associated with shorter LOS (100.5 vs 114.3 hours, P < .001) and lower costs ($16 660 vs $18 243, P = .01) but greater opioid use (odds ratio [OR], 3.80; 95% CI, 1.49-9.70; P < .01). There were no significant differences in 30-day revisits (OR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.73-1.29; P = .84), postdrainage computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging (OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.71-1.15; P = .42), or repeat drainage procedures (OR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.81-1.25; P = .94).

Conclusion: In this large cohort study, children with septic arthritis receiving dexamethasone had shorter hospital LOS and costs without higher 30-day revisit rates. Dexamethasone use varied widely across hospitals. These findings highlight the need for evaluation in a multicenter randomized trial.

脓毒性关节炎住院儿童静脉注射地塞米松的应用及预后
背景:化脓性关节炎的常规治疗是关节引流和抗生素;然而,辅助全身性皮质类固醇可能改善预后。目的:(1)描述静脉地塞米松使用的变化,(2)评估静脉地塞米松使用与脓毒性关节炎住院儿童预后的关系。方法:采用儿科健康信息系统数据库对住院儿童进行回顾性队列研究。我们发现患有国际疾病分类第十版脓毒性关节炎(M00.x)出院代码的儿童静脉注射地塞米松(住院0-2天)。主要观察指标为住院时间(LOS)。次要结局包括费用、引流后成像、阿片类药物使用、重复引流手术和30天急诊科或医院复诊。我们使用倾向评分匹配来解释地塞米松接受者和非接受者之间的测量差异。结果:我们确定了2016年至2020年47家医院的3524例住院治疗。各医院地塞米松使用率中位数为28% (IQR, 19%-44%)。在倾向匹配的队列中,地塞米松与较短的LOS(100.5小时vs 114.3小时)相关,P结论:在这项大型队列研究中,接受地塞米松治疗的感染性关节炎儿童具有较短的住院LOS和费用,且没有较高的30天重访率。地塞米松在各医院的使用差异很大。这些发现强调了在多中心随机试验中进行评估的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hospital pediatrics
Hospital pediatrics Nursing-Pediatrics
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
204
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信