Fluid balance dynamics and early postoperative outcomes in orthotopic liver transplantation: a prospective cohort study

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Suzana Margareth Lobo , Pedro Saggioro Paulucci , Lucas Martins Tavares , Graziela Benardin Luckemeyer , Luana Fernandes Machado , Neymar Elias de Oliveira , Silvia Prado Minhoto , Rita Cassia Alves Silva , Renato Ferreira da Silva , Marlon Souza Freitas , Francisco Ricardo Marques Lobo , Joana Berger-Estilita
{"title":"Fluid balance dynamics and early postoperative outcomes in orthotopic liver transplantation: a prospective cohort study","authors":"Suzana Margareth Lobo ,&nbsp;Pedro Saggioro Paulucci ,&nbsp;Lucas Martins Tavares ,&nbsp;Graziela Benardin Luckemeyer ,&nbsp;Luana Fernandes Machado ,&nbsp;Neymar Elias de Oliveira ,&nbsp;Silvia Prado Minhoto ,&nbsp;Rita Cassia Alves Silva ,&nbsp;Renato Ferreira da Silva ,&nbsp;Marlon Souza Freitas ,&nbsp;Francisco Ricardo Marques Lobo ,&nbsp;Joana Berger-Estilita","doi":"10.1016/j.bjane.2025.844619","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>This study evaluates the impact of Fluid Balance (FB) patterns on outcomes after Orthotopic Liver Transplantation (OLT). It hypothesizes that deviations from optimal FB increase morbidity.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In a single-center cohort post hoc analysis of 73 post-OLT patients, FB was categorized into three groups based on cumulative FB at 72 hours: Lowest (negative FB), Intermediate (0-2000 mL), and Highest (&gt; 2000 mL). We analyzed Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores, mortality rates, and causes of death. Logistic regression identified mortality predictors.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The Highest FB group had the highest SOFA scores and mortality (Group “Lo”: 18.2%, Group “In”: 8.6%, Group “Hi”: 40.5%, p = 0.009). A U-shaped relationship between FB and hospital mortality was observed, with extremes of FB associated with higher mortality. Cumulative FB independently predicted all-cause mortality with a 29.5% increase in the risk of death. FB on day 3 also predicted all-cause mortality, increasing the risk by 83.9%. Furthermore, FB on day 1 was linked to a 134.5% increase in the risk of death due to primary non-function of the liver. SOFA<sub>LIVER</sub> score strongly predicted all-cause mortality, with a one-point increase associated with a 98.8% to 114.7% increase in mortality risk.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>These findings suggest that both negative and positive extremes of FB are associated with worse outcomes after OLT, reinforcing the U-shaped relationship between FB and mortality. Our results underscore the importance of balanced fluid management, particularly in the early postoperative period. The study highlights the need for individualized FB strategies to optimize organ function and reduce mortality. The use of SOFA<sub>LIVER</sub> scores as a predictor of mortality further emphasizes the importance of liver function monitoring in post-OLT patients. However, the single-centre design and convenience sample limit the generalizability of our findings, necessitating validation through multicenter studies.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our study provides valuable insights into the relationship between FB patterns and mortality in OLT patients. Both negative and positive extremes of FB are associated with higher mortality, suggesting the need for a balanced and individualized fluid management approach. The strong predictive value of SOFA<sub>LIVER</sub> scores for all-cause mortality highlights the importance of early and continuous monitoring of liver function. Future multicenter randomized controlled trials are needed to validate these findings and develop optimized fluid management protocols for OLT patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":32356,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology","volume":"75 3","pages":"Article 844619"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0104001425000351","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

This study evaluates the impact of Fluid Balance (FB) patterns on outcomes after Orthotopic Liver Transplantation (OLT). It hypothesizes that deviations from optimal FB increase morbidity.

Methods

In a single-center cohort post hoc analysis of 73 post-OLT patients, FB was categorized into three groups based on cumulative FB at 72 hours: Lowest (negative FB), Intermediate (0-2000 mL), and Highest (> 2000 mL). We analyzed Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores, mortality rates, and causes of death. Logistic regression identified mortality predictors.

Results

The Highest FB group had the highest SOFA scores and mortality (Group “Lo”: 18.2%, Group “In”: 8.6%, Group “Hi”: 40.5%, p = 0.009). A U-shaped relationship between FB and hospital mortality was observed, with extremes of FB associated with higher mortality. Cumulative FB independently predicted all-cause mortality with a 29.5% increase in the risk of death. FB on day 3 also predicted all-cause mortality, increasing the risk by 83.9%. Furthermore, FB on day 1 was linked to a 134.5% increase in the risk of death due to primary non-function of the liver. SOFALIVER score strongly predicted all-cause mortality, with a one-point increase associated with a 98.8% to 114.7% increase in mortality risk.

Discussion

These findings suggest that both negative and positive extremes of FB are associated with worse outcomes after OLT, reinforcing the U-shaped relationship between FB and mortality. Our results underscore the importance of balanced fluid management, particularly in the early postoperative period. The study highlights the need for individualized FB strategies to optimize organ function and reduce mortality. The use of SOFALIVER scores as a predictor of mortality further emphasizes the importance of liver function monitoring in post-OLT patients. However, the single-centre design and convenience sample limit the generalizability of our findings, necessitating validation through multicenter studies.

Conclusion

Our study provides valuable insights into the relationship between FB patterns and mortality in OLT patients. Both negative and positive extremes of FB are associated with higher mortality, suggesting the need for a balanced and individualized fluid management approach. The strong predictive value of SOFALIVER scores for all-cause mortality highlights the importance of early and continuous monitoring of liver function. Future multicenter randomized controlled trials are needed to validate these findings and develop optimized fluid management protocols for OLT patients.
体液平衡动力学和原位肝移植术后早期预后:一项前瞻性队列研究。
本研究评估体液平衡(FB)模式对原位肝移植(OLT)后预后的影响。它假设偏离最佳FB会增加发病率。方法:在对73例olt后患者的单中心队列事后分析中,根据72小时累积FB将FB分为三组:最低(负FB),中间(0-2000 mL)和最高(0-2000 mL)。我们分析了顺序器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分、死亡率和死亡原因。逻辑回归确定了死亡率预测因子。结果:高FB组SOFA评分和死亡率最高(Lo组:18.2%,In组:8.6%,Hi组:40.5%,p = 0.009)。观察到FB与住院死亡率之间呈u型关系,极端FB与较高的死亡率相关。累积FB独立预测全因死亡率,死亡风险增加29.5%。第3天的FB也可以预测全因死亡率,使风险增加83.9%。此外,第1天的FB与原发性肝脏无功能死亡风险增加134.5%有关。SOFALIVER评分强烈预测全因死亡率,每增加1分,死亡风险增加98.8%至114.7%。讨论:这些发现表明FB的阴性和阳性极端与OLT后较差的结果相关,强化了FB与死亡率之间的u型关系。我们的结果强调了平衡液体管理的重要性,特别是在术后早期。该研究强调需要个性化的FB策略来优化器官功能和降低死亡率。使用SOFALIVER评分作为死亡率的预测指标进一步强调了肝移植后患者肝功能监测的重要性。然而,单中心设计和方便的样本限制了我们研究结果的普遍性,需要通过多中心研究进行验证。结论:我们的研究为OLT患者FB模式与死亡率之间的关系提供了有价值的见解。FB的阴性和阳性极端都与较高的死亡率相关,这表明需要平衡和个性化的液体管理方法。SOFALIVER评分对全因死亡率的强大预测价值突出了早期和持续监测肝功能的重要性。需要未来的多中心随机对照试验来验证这些发现,并为OLT患者制定优化的液体管理方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
88
审稿时长
68 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信