Liberalizing Maximum High-Flow Nasal Cannula Flow Rates in the General Inpatient Ward Is Associated With Decreased Intensive Care Admissions for Infants With Bronchiolitis.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Pediatric emergency care Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-07 DOI:10.1097/PEC.0000000000003333
Chris Miller, Michelle Dunn, Jeremy Jones, Rachel Rothstein, Joseph J Zorc
{"title":"Liberalizing Maximum High-Flow Nasal Cannula Flow Rates in the General Inpatient Ward Is Associated With Decreased Intensive Care Admissions for Infants With Bronchiolitis.","authors":"Chris Miller, Michelle Dunn, Jeremy Jones, Rachel Rothstein, Joseph J Zorc","doi":"10.1097/PEC.0000000000003333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the use of intensive care for infants with bronchiolitis following a policy change increasing the rate maximums for high-flow oxygen given by nasal cannula [high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC)] allowable in the inpatient (IP) ward setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective pre-post cohort study at an urban, tertiary care children's hospital. Infants without complex chronic conditions presenting to the emergency department with bronchiolitis from December 2018 to March 2019 and December 2019 to March 2020 were included in the study. In December 2019, our institution increased the allowable HFNC flow rate on IP to 2 liters per minute/kilogram. The primary outcome was patient disposition from the emergency department. Secondary outcomes were the need for IP to pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) transfer, the need for care escalation to positive airway pressure or invasive mechanical ventilation, and hospital length of stay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 1043 and 1104 patients were included in the 2018 to 2019 and 2019 to 2020 cohorts, respectively. Infants in the second cohort were more likely to be admitted, though this association was not significant after adjusting for patient age and triage acuity. Infants in the second cohort had a lower risk of admission to the PICU, before and after adjusting for age and triage acuity. The risk of IP-to-PICU transfer, risk of care escalation, and length of stay did not increase.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Increasing HFNC flow rates up to 2 liters per minute/kilogram on IP wards was associated with a reduction in intensive care admission and appears safe by balancing measures of care escalation.</p>","PeriodicalId":19996,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric emergency care","volume":" ","pages":"504-508"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric emergency care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000003333","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare the use of intensive care for infants with bronchiolitis following a policy change increasing the rate maximums for high-flow oxygen given by nasal cannula [high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC)] allowable in the inpatient (IP) ward setting.

Methods: This was a retrospective pre-post cohort study at an urban, tertiary care children's hospital. Infants without complex chronic conditions presenting to the emergency department with bronchiolitis from December 2018 to March 2019 and December 2019 to March 2020 were included in the study. In December 2019, our institution increased the allowable HFNC flow rate on IP to 2 liters per minute/kilogram. The primary outcome was patient disposition from the emergency department. Secondary outcomes were the need for IP to pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) transfer, the need for care escalation to positive airway pressure or invasive mechanical ventilation, and hospital length of stay.

Results: In total, 1043 and 1104 patients were included in the 2018 to 2019 and 2019 to 2020 cohorts, respectively. Infants in the second cohort were more likely to be admitted, though this association was not significant after adjusting for patient age and triage acuity. Infants in the second cohort had a lower risk of admission to the PICU, before and after adjusting for age and triage acuity. The risk of IP-to-PICU transfer, risk of care escalation, and length of stay did not increase.

Conclusions: Increasing HFNC flow rates up to 2 liters per minute/kilogram on IP wards was associated with a reduction in intensive care admission and appears safe by balancing measures of care escalation.

放开普通住院病房的最大高流量鼻插管流量与毛细支气管炎婴儿重症监护入院率的降低有关。
目的:比较住院(IP)病房允许的高流量鼻插管(high-flow nasal cannula, HFNC)给氧率最大值增加后,毛细支气管炎婴儿重症监护的使用情况。方法:这是一项在城市三级保健儿童医院进行的回顾性前后队列研究。研究纳入了2018年12月至2019年3月和2019年12月至2020年3月期间因毛细支气管炎就诊于急诊科的无复杂慢性病的婴儿。2019年12月,我机构将IP上的HFNC允许流量提高到每分钟2升/公斤。主要结果是急诊科的病人处理情况。次要结局是是否需要将IP转移到儿科重症监护病房(PICU),是否需要将护理升级到气道正压或有创机械通气,以及住院时间。结果:2018 - 2019年和2019 - 2020年共纳入1043例和1104例患者。第二组的婴儿更有可能入院,尽管在调整患者年龄和分诊敏锐度后,这种关联并不显著。第二组婴儿在调整年龄和分诊敏锐度前后进入PICU的风险较低。ip转至picu的风险、护理升级风险和住院时间均未增加。结论:在IP病房将HFNC流速提高至每分钟/公斤2升与重症监护入院率的减少有关,并且通过平衡护理升级措施似乎是安全的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric emergency care
Pediatric emergency care 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
577
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Emergency Care®, features clinically relevant original articles with an EM perspective on the care of acutely ill or injured children and adolescents. The journal is aimed at both the pediatrician who wants to know more about treating and being compensated for minor emergency cases and the emergency physicians who must treat children or adolescents in more than one case in there.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信