Detection of fluid responsiveness by changes of perfusion index and pleth-variability index during passive leg raising in spontaneously breathing post-surgical patients: a prospective interventional study.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Simon Rauch, Paolo Mario Seraglio, Tomas Dal Cappello, Giulia Roveri, Markus Falk, Matthias Bock
{"title":"Detection of fluid responsiveness by changes of perfusion index and pleth-variability index during passive leg raising in spontaneously breathing post-surgical patients: a prospective interventional study.","authors":"Simon Rauch, Paolo Mario Seraglio, Tomas Dal Cappello, Giulia Roveri, Markus Falk, Matthias Bock","doi":"10.1007/s10877-025-01292-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Predicting fluid responsiveness is crucial in treating circulatory failure, as only about half of patients benefit from volume expansion by increasing cardiac output (CO). Dynamic tests like passive leg raising (PLR) are preferred over static parameters. While PLR reliably predicts fluid responsiveness, it typically requires invasive measurement of stroke volume (SV) or CO. The perfusion index (PI) and pleth variability index (PVI) are non-invasive metrics derived from oxygen saturation signals. PI has been shown to correlate with SV, and PVI has predicted fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients, but their role in spontaneously breathing patients remains unclear. This study aimed to assess whether PI and PVI could predict fluid responsiveness in post-surgical, spontaneously breathing patients during a PLR test. The hypothesis was that PI would increase and PVI would decrease in fluid responders. The prospective study included spontaneously breathing patients after major abdominal surgery in the ICU of Merano Hospital, Italy. SV and CO were measured using the FloTrac™ system, and PI and PVI were assessed using the Radical 7<sup>®</sup> monitor. Patients were considered responders if SV increased by ≥ 10% during the PLR test. Of the 47 patients enrolled, 23 (48.9%) were fluid responders. The percentage change in PI from baseline to 60 s into the PLR test was + 41.2% in responders and + 11.3% in non-responders. A PI increase of ≥ 23% predicted responders with 70% sensitivity and 75% specificity, with an area under the ROC curve of 0.74. Twenty-two patients (47%) were inside the grey zone. PVI did not differ significantly between groups. In conclusion, PI could be a helpful non-invasive tool for predicting fluid responsiveness during a PLR test in spontaneously breathing patients, though its diagnostic accuracy appears to be moderate.</p>","PeriodicalId":15513,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-025-01292-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Predicting fluid responsiveness is crucial in treating circulatory failure, as only about half of patients benefit from volume expansion by increasing cardiac output (CO). Dynamic tests like passive leg raising (PLR) are preferred over static parameters. While PLR reliably predicts fluid responsiveness, it typically requires invasive measurement of stroke volume (SV) or CO. The perfusion index (PI) and pleth variability index (PVI) are non-invasive metrics derived from oxygen saturation signals. PI has been shown to correlate with SV, and PVI has predicted fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients, but their role in spontaneously breathing patients remains unclear. This study aimed to assess whether PI and PVI could predict fluid responsiveness in post-surgical, spontaneously breathing patients during a PLR test. The hypothesis was that PI would increase and PVI would decrease in fluid responders. The prospective study included spontaneously breathing patients after major abdominal surgery in the ICU of Merano Hospital, Italy. SV and CO were measured using the FloTrac™ system, and PI and PVI were assessed using the Radical 7® monitor. Patients were considered responders if SV increased by ≥ 10% during the PLR test. Of the 47 patients enrolled, 23 (48.9%) were fluid responders. The percentage change in PI from baseline to 60 s into the PLR test was + 41.2% in responders and + 11.3% in non-responders. A PI increase of ≥ 23% predicted responders with 70% sensitivity and 75% specificity, with an area under the ROC curve of 0.74. Twenty-two patients (47%) were inside the grey zone. PVI did not differ significantly between groups. In conclusion, PI could be a helpful non-invasive tool for predicting fluid responsiveness during a PLR test in spontaneously breathing patients, though its diagnostic accuracy appears to be moderate.

术后自主呼吸患者被动抬腿时灌注指数和容积变异性指数变化检测液体反应性:一项前瞻性介入研究
预测液体反应性对于治疗循环衰竭至关重要,因为只有大约一半的患者通过增加心输出量(CO)而受益于容量扩张。动态测试如被动抬腿(PLR)优于静态参数。虽然PLR可以可靠地预测流体反应性,但它通常需要有创测量脑卒中容量(SV)或CO。灌注指数(PI)和容积变异性指数(PVI)是由氧饱和度信号得出的无创指标。PI已被证明与SV相关,PVI预测了机械通气患者的液体反应性,但它们在自发呼吸患者中的作用尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估PI和PVI是否可以预测术后自主呼吸患者在PLR测试期间的液体反应性。假设液体反应者的PI会增加,而PVI会降低。前瞻性研究包括意大利Merano医院重症监护室大腹部手术后自主呼吸的患者。使用FloTrac™系统测量SV和CO,使用Radical 7®监测器评估PI和PVI。如果在PLR试验中SV升高≥10%,则认为患者有反应。在纳入的47例患者中,23例(48.9%)有液体反应。从基线到进入PLR测试的60秒的PI变化百分比在应答者中为+ 41.2%,在无应答者中为+ 11.3%。PI升高≥23%预示有应答者,敏感性70%,特异性75%,ROC曲线下面积0.74。22名患者(47%)处于灰色地带。各组间PVI差异无统计学意义。总之,PI可能是一种有用的非侵入性工具,用于预测自发呼吸患者在PLR试验期间的液体反应,尽管其诊断准确性似乎是中等的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.60%
发文量
144
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing is a clinical journal publishing papers related to technology in the fields of anaesthesia, intensive care medicine, emergency medicine, and peri-operative medicine. The journal has links with numerous specialist societies, including editorial board representatives from the European Society for Computing and Technology in Anaesthesia and Intensive Care (ESCTAIC), the Society for Technology in Anesthesia (STA), the Society for Complex Acute Illness (SCAI) and the NAVAt (NAVigating towards your Anaestheisa Targets) group. The journal publishes original papers, narrative and systematic reviews, technological notes, letters to the editor, editorial or commentary papers, and policy statements or guidelines from national or international societies. The journal encourages debate on published papers and technology, including letters commenting on previous publications or technological concerns. The journal occasionally publishes special issues with technological or clinical themes, or reports and abstracts from scientificmeetings. Special issues proposals should be sent to the Editor-in-Chief. Specific details of types of papers, and the clinical and technological content of papers considered within scope can be found in instructions for authors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信