Zero Suicide Model Implementation and Suicide Attempt Rates in Outpatient Mental Health Care.

IF 10.5 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Brian K Ahmedani, Robert B Penfold, Cathrine Frank, Julie E Richards, Christine Stewart, Jennifer M Boggs, Karen J Coleman, Stacy Sterling, Bobbi Jo H Yarborough, Gregory Clarke, Michael Schoenbaum, Erika M Aguirre-Miyamoto, Lee J Barton, Hsueh-Han Yeh, Joslyn Westphal, Sarah McDonald, Arne Beck, Rinad S Beidas, Laura Richardson, Jacqueline M Ryan, Edward T Buckingham, Stuart Buttlaire, Cambria Bruschke, Jean Flores, Gregory E Simon
{"title":"Zero Suicide Model Implementation and Suicide Attempt Rates in Outpatient Mental Health Care.","authors":"Brian K Ahmedani, Robert B Penfold, Cathrine Frank, Julie E Richards, Christine Stewart, Jennifer M Boggs, Karen J Coleman, Stacy Sterling, Bobbi Jo H Yarborough, Gregory Clarke, Michael Schoenbaum, Erika M Aguirre-Miyamoto, Lee J Barton, Hsueh-Han Yeh, Joslyn Westphal, Sarah McDonald, Arne Beck, Rinad S Beidas, Laura Richardson, Jacqueline M Ryan, Edward T Buckingham, Stuart Buttlaire, Cambria Bruschke, Jean Flores, Gregory E Simon","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.3721","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Suicide is a major public health concern, and as most individuals have contact with health care practitioners before suicide, health systems are essential for suicide prevention. The Zero Suicide (ZS) model is the recommended approach for suicide prevention in health systems, but more evidence is needed to support its widespread adoption.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine suicide attempt rates associated with implementation of the ZS model in outpatient mental health care within 6 US health systems.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This quality improvement study with an interrupted time series design used data collected from January 2012 through December 2019, from patients aged 13 years or older who received mental health care at outpatient mental health specialty settings within 6 US health systems located in 5 states: California, Oregon, Washington, Colorado, and Michigan. Analyses were conducted from January through December 2024.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>The ZS model was implemented in 4 health systems at different points during the observation period (2012-2019) and compared with health systems that implemented the model before the observation period (postimplementation). Implementation included suicide risk screening, assessment, brief intervention (safety plan, means safety protocol), and behavioral health treatment.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary outcome was a measure of standardized monthly suicide attempt rates captured using health system records and government mortality records. Suicide death rates were also measured as a secondary outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a median of 309 107 (range, 55 354-451 837) unique patients per month. In 2017, there were 317 939 eligible individuals (63.2% female). Baseline suicide attempt rates were at least 30 to 40 per 100 000 individuals at each implementation site and decreased to less than 30 per 100 000 individuals at 3 sites by 2019. Decreases in suicide attempt rates were observed at 3 intervention health systems after site-specific implementation: health systems A and B had decreases of 0.7 per 100 000 individuals per month and C, 0.1 per 100 000 individuals per month. System D evidenced a similar suicide attempt rate after implementation (before implementation: median rate: 35.0 [range, 11.0-50.3] per 100 000 patients per month; after implementation: median rate: 34.3 [range, 18.5-42.0] per 100 000 patients per month). The 2 postimplementation health systems maintained low or declining suicide attempt rates throughout the observation period. The rate at system Y decreased by 0.3 per 100 000 individuals per month across the observation period. The rate at system Z began at 11 per 100 000 individuals per month and declined by 0.03 per 100 000 individuals per month during the observation period. Two systems evidenced reductions in the suicide death rate after implementation: system B declined by 0.2 per 100 000 individuals per month and system C by 0.1 per 100 000 individuals per month.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this quality improvement study, ZS model implementation was associated with a reduction in suicide attempt rates among patients accessing outpatient mental health care at most study sites, which supports widespread efforts to implement the ZS model in these settings within US health systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"8 4","pages":"e253721"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Network Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.3721","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Suicide is a major public health concern, and as most individuals have contact with health care practitioners before suicide, health systems are essential for suicide prevention. The Zero Suicide (ZS) model is the recommended approach for suicide prevention in health systems, but more evidence is needed to support its widespread adoption.

Objective: To examine suicide attempt rates associated with implementation of the ZS model in outpatient mental health care within 6 US health systems.

Design, setting, and participants: This quality improvement study with an interrupted time series design used data collected from January 2012 through December 2019, from patients aged 13 years or older who received mental health care at outpatient mental health specialty settings within 6 US health systems located in 5 states: California, Oregon, Washington, Colorado, and Michigan. Analyses were conducted from January through December 2024.

Exposure: The ZS model was implemented in 4 health systems at different points during the observation period (2012-2019) and compared with health systems that implemented the model before the observation period (postimplementation). Implementation included suicide risk screening, assessment, brief intervention (safety plan, means safety protocol), and behavioral health treatment.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was a measure of standardized monthly suicide attempt rates captured using health system records and government mortality records. Suicide death rates were also measured as a secondary outcome.

Results: There was a median of 309 107 (range, 55 354-451 837) unique patients per month. In 2017, there were 317 939 eligible individuals (63.2% female). Baseline suicide attempt rates were at least 30 to 40 per 100 000 individuals at each implementation site and decreased to less than 30 per 100 000 individuals at 3 sites by 2019. Decreases in suicide attempt rates were observed at 3 intervention health systems after site-specific implementation: health systems A and B had decreases of 0.7 per 100 000 individuals per month and C, 0.1 per 100 000 individuals per month. System D evidenced a similar suicide attempt rate after implementation (before implementation: median rate: 35.0 [range, 11.0-50.3] per 100 000 patients per month; after implementation: median rate: 34.3 [range, 18.5-42.0] per 100 000 patients per month). The 2 postimplementation health systems maintained low or declining suicide attempt rates throughout the observation period. The rate at system Y decreased by 0.3 per 100 000 individuals per month across the observation period. The rate at system Z began at 11 per 100 000 individuals per month and declined by 0.03 per 100 000 individuals per month during the observation period. Two systems evidenced reductions in the suicide death rate after implementation: system B declined by 0.2 per 100 000 individuals per month and system C by 0.1 per 100 000 individuals per month.

Conclusions and relevance: In this quality improvement study, ZS model implementation was associated with a reduction in suicide attempt rates among patients accessing outpatient mental health care at most study sites, which supports widespread efforts to implement the ZS model in these settings within US health systems.

零自杀模式的实施和自杀未遂率在门诊精神卫生保健。
重要性:自杀是一个主要的公共卫生问题,由于大多数人在自杀前都与卫生保健从业人员有过接触,因此卫生系统对预防自杀至关重要。零自杀(ZS)模式是卫生系统中预防自杀的推荐方法,但需要更多证据支持其广泛采用。目的:在美国6个卫生系统中检查与实施ZS模式的门诊精神卫生保健相关的自杀企图率。设计、环境和参与者:这项采用中断时间序列设计的质量改善研究使用了2012年1月至2019年12月收集的数据,这些数据来自位于加利福尼亚州、俄勒冈州、华盛顿州、科罗拉多州和密歇根州的6个美国卫生系统的门诊精神卫生专业设置中接受精神卫生保健的13岁或以上患者。分析从2024年1月到12月进行。暴露:在观察期(2012-2019年)的不同时间点在4个卫生系统中实施了ZS模型,并与观察期之前(实施后)实施该模型的卫生系统进行了比较。实施包括自杀风险筛查、评估、简短干预(安全计划,意味着安全协议)和行为健康治疗。主要结局和措施:主要结局是衡量使用卫生系统记录和政府死亡率记录捕获的标准化月度自杀企图率。自杀死亡率也作为次要结果进行测量。结果:平均每月有309例 107例(范围:55 354-451 837)患者。2017年共有317人 939人(女性占63.2%)。每个实施点的基线自杀企图率至少为每10万 万人中30至40人,到2019年在3个实施点降至每10万 万人中不到30人。在具体地点实施后,在3个干预卫生系统中观察到自杀未遂率的下降:卫生系统A和B每月每100 000 人减少0.7人,C每月每100 万人减少0.1人。D系统在实施后证明了类似的自杀企图率(实施前:中位数率:35.0[范围,11.0-50.3]/ 100000 /每月 000例患者;实施后:中位率:34.3[范围,18.5-42.0]/ 100000 000患者/月)。在整个观察期间,这两个实施后的卫生系统维持了较低或不断下降的自杀企图率。在整个观察期间,Y系统的比率每月每100 000人减少0.3人 000人。Z系统的发病率开始时为每月每100 000 000个人11只,在观察期间每月每100 000个人下降0.03只。有两个系统在实施后证明自杀死亡率有所下降:系统B每月每100 000 人中下降0.2人,系统C每月每100 人中下降0.1人。结论和相关性:在这项质量改进研究中,ZS模型的实施与大多数研究地点接受门诊精神卫生保健的患者自杀未遂率的降低有关,这支持了在美国卫生系统内这些环境中实施ZS模型的广泛努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JAMA Network Open
JAMA Network Open Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
16.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
2126
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: JAMA Network Open, a member of the esteemed JAMA Network, stands as an international, peer-reviewed, open-access general medical journal.The publication is dedicated to disseminating research across various health disciplines and countries, encompassing clinical care, innovation in health care, health policy, and global health. JAMA Network Open caters to clinicians, investigators, and policymakers, providing a platform for valuable insights and advancements in the medical field. As part of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed general medical and specialty publications, JAMA Network Open contributes to the collective knowledge and understanding within the medical community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信