Comparing durvalumab, olaparib, and cediranib monotherapy, combination therapy, or chemotherapy in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer with prior bevacizumab: the phase II NRG-GY023 trial.

IF 10 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Jung-Min Lee, Austin Miller, Peter G Rose, Mariam AlHilli, Christina Washington, Veena S John, Chirag A Shah, Koji Matsuo, Jean Siedel, David S Miller, Elizabeth E Hopp, Andrea O'Shea, John K Chan, Leslie S Bradford, Christopher B Morse, Christa I Nagel, Kerry J Rodabaugh, Elise C Kohn, Kathleen N Moore, Joyce F Liu
{"title":"Comparing durvalumab, olaparib, and cediranib monotherapy, combination therapy, or chemotherapy in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer with prior bevacizumab: the phase II NRG-GY023 trial.","authors":"Jung-Min Lee, Austin Miller, Peter G Rose, Mariam AlHilli, Christina Washington, Veena S John, Chirag A Shah, Koji Matsuo, Jean Siedel, David S Miller, Elizabeth E Hopp, Andrea O'Shea, John K Chan, Leslie S Bradford, Christopher B Morse, Christa I Nagel, Kerry J Rodabaugh, Elise C Kohn, Kathleen N Moore, Joyce F Liu","doi":"10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-24-3877","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We assessed the efficacy of anti-PD-L1 durvalumab in combination with olaparib and cediranib (DOC), compared to the standard-of-care chemotherapy (SOC) in platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer (PROC) patients, with prior bevacizumab.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>NRG-GY023 was the first, randomized 4-arm superiority phase II trial enrolling high-grade serous/endometrioid or clear cell PROC patients with prior bevacizumab exposure. Patients were randomized 1:2:2:2 to SOC (weekly paclitaxel, topotecan or pegylated liposomal doxorubicin), DOC, durvalumab+cediranib (DC), or olaparib+cediranib (OC). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR) and safety. The design had 80% power to detect a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.5 using a one-sided, ⍺=0.1 level test for each comparison to the SOC with a pre-planned interim analysis. Experimental arms with HR estimate (vs SOC)>0.87 could be discontinued.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>153 patients were enrolled between 4/28/2021, and 2/1/2023. Accrual was permanently closed on 2/1/2023, due to futility. With a data cut-off of 9/9/2024, the median PFS was 3.4, 2.9, 2.5 and 2.8 months, and median OS was 7.5, 8.3, 5.7 and 10.2 months for SOC, DOC, DC and OC, respectively. ORR was 4.3%(95%CI:0.00-0.19), 15.9%(95%CI:0.07-0.29), 11.9%(95%CI:0.05-0.24) and 9.1%(95%CI:0.03-0.20) for SOC, DOC, DC, OC. Compared to SOC, the PFS HR estimates for DOC, DC, OC were 1.003(95%CI:0.56-1.80), 1.108(95%CI:0.63-1.96), and 1.021(95%CI:0.57-1.82). for SOC, DOC, DC, OC, respectively. No new safety signals were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In PROC patients with prior bevacizumab, all experimental arms failed to reach the primary objective of improving PFS compared with SOC.</p>","PeriodicalId":10279,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cancer Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Cancer Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-24-3877","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: We assessed the efficacy of anti-PD-L1 durvalumab in combination with olaparib and cediranib (DOC), compared to the standard-of-care chemotherapy (SOC) in platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer (PROC) patients, with prior bevacizumab.

Patients and methods: NRG-GY023 was the first, randomized 4-arm superiority phase II trial enrolling high-grade serous/endometrioid or clear cell PROC patients with prior bevacizumab exposure. Patients were randomized 1:2:2:2 to SOC (weekly paclitaxel, topotecan or pegylated liposomal doxorubicin), DOC, durvalumab+cediranib (DC), or olaparib+cediranib (OC). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR) and safety. The design had 80% power to detect a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.5 using a one-sided, ⍺=0.1 level test for each comparison to the SOC with a pre-planned interim analysis. Experimental arms with HR estimate (vs SOC)>0.87 could be discontinued.

Results: 153 patients were enrolled between 4/28/2021, and 2/1/2023. Accrual was permanently closed on 2/1/2023, due to futility. With a data cut-off of 9/9/2024, the median PFS was 3.4, 2.9, 2.5 and 2.8 months, and median OS was 7.5, 8.3, 5.7 and 10.2 months for SOC, DOC, DC and OC, respectively. ORR was 4.3%(95%CI:0.00-0.19), 15.9%(95%CI:0.07-0.29), 11.9%(95%CI:0.05-0.24) and 9.1%(95%CI:0.03-0.20) for SOC, DOC, DC, OC. Compared to SOC, the PFS HR estimates for DOC, DC, OC were 1.003(95%CI:0.56-1.80), 1.108(95%CI:0.63-1.96), and 1.021(95%CI:0.57-1.82). for SOC, DOC, DC, OC, respectively. No new safety signals were observed.

Conclusion: In PROC patients with prior bevacizumab, all experimental arms failed to reach the primary objective of improving PFS compared with SOC.

比较durvalumab, olaparib和cediranib单药治疗,联合治疗或化疗对铂耐药卵巢癌患者与既往贝伐单抗:II期NRG-GY023试验
目的:我们评估抗pd - l1 durvalumab联合奥拉帕尼和西地尼(DOC)与标准护理化疗(SOC)在既往使用贝伐单抗的铂耐药上皮性卵巢癌(PROC)患者中的疗效。患者和方法:NRG-GY023是首个随机4组优势II期试验,纳入既往有贝伐单抗暴露的高级别浆液/子宫内膜样或透明细胞PROC患者。患者按1:2:2:2随机分为SOC(每周紫杉醇、拓扑替康或聚乙二醇化脂质体阿霉素)、DOC、杜伐单抗+西地拉尼(DC)或奥拉帕尼+西地拉尼(OC)。主要终点为无进展生存期(PFS)。次要终点包括总生存期(OS)、总缓解率(ORR)和安全性。该设计有80%的能力检测0.5的风险比(HR),使用单侧,0.1水平测试,对SOC进行每次比较,并进行预先计划的中期分析。HR估计(vs SOC)>0.87的实验组可以停止。结果:153名患者在2021年4月28日至2023年2月1日期间入组。由于无效,应计项目于2023年2月1日永久关闭。截止日期为2024年9月9日,SOC、DOC、DC和OC的中位PFS分别为3.4、2.9、2.5和2.8个月,中位OS分别为7.5、8.3、5.7和10.2个月。或者是4.3%(95%置信区间:0.00—-0.19),15.9%(95%置信区间:0.07—-0.29),11.9%(95%置信区间ci: 0.05 - -0.24)和9.1%(95%置信区间:0.03—-0.20)SOC,医生,OC。与SOC相比,DOC、DC、OC的PFS HR估计分别为1.003(95%CI:0.56-1.80)、1.108(95%CI:0.63-1.96)和1.021(95%CI:0.57-1.82)。分别为SOC、DOC、DC、OC。没有观察到新的安全信号。结论:在既往使用贝伐单抗的PROC患者中,与SOC相比,所有实验组均未能达到改善PFS的主要目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Cancer Research
Clinical Cancer Research 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
20.10
自引率
1.70%
发文量
1207
审稿时长
2.1 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Cancer Research is a journal focusing on groundbreaking research in cancer, specifically in the areas where the laboratory and the clinic intersect. Our primary interest lies in clinical trials that investigate novel treatments, accompanied by research on pharmacology, molecular alterations, and biomarkers that can predict response or resistance to these treatments. Furthermore, we prioritize laboratory and animal studies that explore new drugs and targeted agents with the potential to advance to clinical trials. We also encourage research on targetable mechanisms of cancer development, progression, and metastasis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信