The influence of geographical distance on the decay of beetle community similarity: Native habitat and agricultural monocultures A influência da distância geográfica no decaimento da similaridade da comunidade de besouros: Habitat nativo e monoculturas agrícolas

IF 1.6 3区 农林科学 Q2 ENTOMOLOGY
Camila Eunice Pereira Volff, Danielle Storck-Tonon, Mônica Josene Barbosa Pereira, Ayr de Moura Bello, Thiago Junqueira Izzo
{"title":"The influence of geographical distance on the decay of beetle community similarity: Native habitat and agricultural monocultures\n A influência da distância geográfica no decaimento da similaridade da comunidade de besouros: Habitat nativo e monoculturas agrícolas","authors":"Camila Eunice Pereira Volff,&nbsp;Danielle Storck-Tonon,&nbsp;Mônica Josene Barbosa Pereira,&nbsp;Ayr de Moura Bello,&nbsp;Thiago Junqueira Izzo","doi":"10.1111/afe.12656","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>1. The replacement of native habitats by monocultures has led to the loss of insect biodiversity, including beetles.</p><p>2. In an attempt to minimize this loss, Brazilian legislation requires farmers to conserve a proportion of farmland as a Legal Reserve.</p><p>3. In this study, we investigated the decay of similarity in beetle communities of soybean monocultures compared to Legal Reserves.</p><p>4. To do this, we studied 77 sample points distributed across the transition zone between the Amazon and Cerrado biomes, with a maximum distance of 625 km between the farthest points.</p><p>5. Our results show that the transformation of forest areas into monocultures causes a drastic decrease in beta diversity for both herbivores and predators.</p><p>6. This pattern is not observed in Legal Reserves, where the communities are, for the most part, different in a short geographic space.</p><p>7. We noted an increase in beta diversity between sites at a shorter distance (200 km) compared with soybean monoculture areas (350 km).</p><p>8. In these environments, many species are generalist pests that benefit from the simplified landscape.</p><p>9. To verify the relationship between species dissimilarity and geographic distances, we used the Chord-Normalized Expected Species Shared dissimilarity index, replacing Bray–Curtis due to its robustness in dealing with small samples or subsampling.</p><p>10. We reinforce the importance of Legal Reserves in conserving beetle biodiversity, emphasizing the need for preserved areas distributed throughout the landscape as they play a crucial role in maintaining beta diversity and preserving ecosystem services in anthropized landscapes.</p>","PeriodicalId":7454,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural and Forest Entomology","volume":"27 2","pages":"202-210"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural and Forest Entomology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/afe.12656","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

1. The replacement of native habitats by monocultures has led to the loss of insect biodiversity, including beetles.

2. In an attempt to minimize this loss, Brazilian legislation requires farmers to conserve a proportion of farmland as a Legal Reserve.

3. In this study, we investigated the decay of similarity in beetle communities of soybean monocultures compared to Legal Reserves.

4. To do this, we studied 77 sample points distributed across the transition zone between the Amazon and Cerrado biomes, with a maximum distance of 625 km between the farthest points.

5. Our results show that the transformation of forest areas into monocultures causes a drastic decrease in beta diversity for both herbivores and predators.

6. This pattern is not observed in Legal Reserves, where the communities are, for the most part, different in a short geographic space.

7. We noted an increase in beta diversity between sites at a shorter distance (200 km) compared with soybean monoculture areas (350 km).

8. In these environments, many species are generalist pests that benefit from the simplified landscape.

9. To verify the relationship between species dissimilarity and geographic distances, we used the Chord-Normalized Expected Species Shared dissimilarity index, replacing Bray–Curtis due to its robustness in dealing with small samples or subsampling.

10. We reinforce the importance of Legal Reserves in conserving beetle biodiversity, emphasizing the need for preserved areas distributed throughout the landscape as they play a crucial role in maintaining beta diversity and preserving ecosystem services in anthropized landscapes.

地理距离对甲虫群落相似性衰减的影响:原生栖息地和单一农耕地 地理距离对甲虫群落相似性衰减的影响:原生栖息地和单一农耕地
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agricultural and Forest Entomology
Agricultural and Forest Entomology 农林科学-昆虫学
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
6.20%
发文量
66
审稿时长
>24 weeks
期刊介绍: Agricultural and Forest Entomology provides a multi-disciplinary and international forum in which researchers can present their work on all aspects of agricultural and forest entomology to other researchers, policy makers and professionals. The Journal welcomes primary research papers, reviews and short communications on entomological research relevant to the control of insect and other arthropod pests. We invite high quality original research papers on the biology, population dynamics, impact and management of pests of the full range of forest, agricultural and horticultural crops.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信