The Corridor as Commodity: Enclosure, Legibility, and Uneven Development in Southeast Asian Railway Projects

IF 3.6 1区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Antipode Pub Date : 2025-03-12 DOI:10.1111/anti.70014
Jessica DiCarlo, David Fernando Bachrach
{"title":"The Corridor as Commodity: Enclosure, Legibility, and Uneven Development in Southeast Asian Railway Projects","authors":"Jessica DiCarlo,&nbsp;David Fernando Bachrach","doi":"10.1111/anti.70014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Corridors are promoted as seamless solutions for economic development, integrating production and consumption networks. However, they often fall short, fail, and operate as tools of accumulation for some while unevenly and, at times, violently reshaping the lives of others. This paper examines how corridors are constructed through dialectical processes of enclosure and opening, involving the enclosure of land, livelihoods, and social relations alongside the opening of spaces for speculation and accumulation, which we argue constitute <i>corridorisation</i>. Central to this process is abstraction, which transforms corridors into commodities, obscuring inherent contradictions and violence. Drawing on Marx's concept of commodity fetishism, we analyse corridors in Indonesia and Laos to trace the processes and effects of corridorisation. By exposing the fetishisation of corridors, this paper unmasks the hidden social relations and uneven impacts underpinning their development, shedding light on who and what is excluded from these visions of progress.</p>","PeriodicalId":8241,"journal":{"name":"Antipode","volume":"57 3","pages":"930-952"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/anti.70014","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antipode","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/anti.70014","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Corridors are promoted as seamless solutions for economic development, integrating production and consumption networks. However, they often fall short, fail, and operate as tools of accumulation for some while unevenly and, at times, violently reshaping the lives of others. This paper examines how corridors are constructed through dialectical processes of enclosure and opening, involving the enclosure of land, livelihoods, and social relations alongside the opening of spaces for speculation and accumulation, which we argue constitute corridorisation. Central to this process is abstraction, which transforms corridors into commodities, obscuring inherent contradictions and violence. Drawing on Marx's concept of commodity fetishism, we analyse corridors in Indonesia and Laos to trace the processes and effects of corridorisation. By exposing the fetishisation of corridors, this paper unmasks the hidden social relations and uneven impacts underpinning their development, shedding light on who and what is excluded from these visions of progress.

Abstract Image

作为商品的走廊:东南亚铁路项目的圈闭、易读性与发展不平衡
走廊被推广为经济发展的无缝解决方案,整合了生产和消费网络。然而,它们往往达不到目标,失败,在一段时间内作为积累的工具,不均衡地发挥作用,有时猛烈地重塑其他人的生活。本文考察了走廊是如何通过封闭和开放的辩证过程来构建的,包括土地、生计和社会关系的封闭,以及投机和积累空间的开放,我们认为这构成了走廊化。这个过程的核心是抽象,它把走廊变成商品,掩盖了内在的矛盾和暴力。借鉴马克思的商品拜物教概念,我们分析了印度尼西亚和老挝的走廊,以追踪走廊化的过程和影响。通过揭露对走廊的崇拜,本文揭示了隐藏的社会关系和支撑其发展的不平衡影响,揭示了被排除在这些进步愿景之外的人和事。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Antipode
Antipode GEOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
111
期刊介绍: Antipode has published dissenting scholarship that explores and utilizes key geographical ideas like space, scale, place, borders and landscape. It aims to challenge dominant and orthodox views of the world through debate, scholarship and politically-committed research, creating new spaces and envisioning new futures. Antipode welcomes the infusion of new ideas and the shaking up of old positions, without being committed to just one view of radical analysis or politics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信