China's Eco-Civilisation, Climate Leviathan, and Hobbesian Energy Transition

IF 3.6 1区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Antipode Pub Date : 2025-03-06 DOI:10.1111/anti.70009
David Chen
{"title":"China's Eco-Civilisation, Climate Leviathan, and Hobbesian Energy Transition","authors":"David Chen","doi":"10.1111/anti.70009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Scholars have hitherto tended to theorise China's ecological civilisation project either as a form of environmental authoritarianism or as a vision of eco-socialism. This paper contributes to the conversation by conducting a textual analysis of Chinese scholarly discussions on eco-civilisation. The analysis uncovers topics and themes related to both narratives of environmental authoritarianism and eco-socialist envisioning. It also captures the shift in discussion from an ideological critique of industrial civilisation to a techno-bureaucratic agenda concerning sustainable development and governance strategies, along with the growing roles of the party-state, state-corporate cooperation, and geopolitical ambition. To interpret the findings, I revisit the neo-Weberian institutionalist notion of embedded autonomy and revise it through critical realist Marxism, not only to explain the growing bureaucratisation of eco-civilisation but also to untangle its Hobbesian institutional features that distinguish China's eco-civilisation project (or the making of a Climate Leviathan) from the Western liberal mode of environmental governance.</p>","PeriodicalId":8241,"journal":{"name":"Antipode","volume":"57 3","pages":"830-861"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/anti.70009","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antipode","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/anti.70009","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Scholars have hitherto tended to theorise China's ecological civilisation project either as a form of environmental authoritarianism or as a vision of eco-socialism. This paper contributes to the conversation by conducting a textual analysis of Chinese scholarly discussions on eco-civilisation. The analysis uncovers topics and themes related to both narratives of environmental authoritarianism and eco-socialist envisioning. It also captures the shift in discussion from an ideological critique of industrial civilisation to a techno-bureaucratic agenda concerning sustainable development and governance strategies, along with the growing roles of the party-state, state-corporate cooperation, and geopolitical ambition. To interpret the findings, I revisit the neo-Weberian institutionalist notion of embedded autonomy and revise it through critical realist Marxism, not only to explain the growing bureaucratisation of eco-civilisation but also to untangle its Hobbesian institutional features that distinguish China's eco-civilisation project (or the making of a Climate Leviathan) from the Western liberal mode of environmental governance.

Abstract Image

中国生态文明、气候利维坦与霍布斯能源转型
迄今为止,学者们倾向于将中国的生态文明工程理论化,要么将其视为一种环境威权主义,要么将其视为一种生态社会主义愿景。本文通过对中国关于生态文明的学术讨论进行文本分析,为对话做出贡献。分析揭示了与环境威权主义和生态社会主义设想的叙述相关的主题和主题。它还捕捉到了讨论的转变,从对工业文明的意识形态批判,到关于可持续发展和治理战略的技术官僚议程,以及党国、国有企业合作和地缘政治野心日益重要的作用。为了解释这些发现,我重新审视了新韦伯制度主义的嵌入式自治概念,并通过批判现实主义马克思主义对其进行了修正,不仅解释了生态文明日益增长的官僚化,而且理清了其霍布斯制度特征,这些特征将中国的生态文明项目(或气候利维坦的制作)与西方自由主义的环境治理模式区分开来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Antipode
Antipode GEOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
111
期刊介绍: Antipode has published dissenting scholarship that explores and utilizes key geographical ideas like space, scale, place, borders and landscape. It aims to challenge dominant and orthodox views of the world through debate, scholarship and politically-committed research, creating new spaces and envisioning new futures. Antipode welcomes the infusion of new ideas and the shaking up of old positions, without being committed to just one view of radical analysis or politics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信