{"title":"Improved CFD modeling of radial void fraction distribution in flow boiling: A novel approach for wide-ranging operating conditions","authors":"Yujiao Peng, Jianqiang Shan, Junliang Guo, Yudong Zha, Miao Gui","doi":"10.1016/j.anucene.2025.111445","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Accurate prediction of void fraction distribution in flow boiling is of great significance for the thermal–hydraulic analysis and safety of nuclear power plants. Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) methods have consistently proven to be effective for boiling simulation. Due to the complexity of boiling phenomena, the prediction of radial void fraction distribution in tubes tends to be challenging, thus hindering a clear understanding of the underlying mechanism. In this work, with the aim of achieving the void fraction prediction over a wide range, the DEBORA experiment operated with R12 was simulated within the pressure range of 1.46–3 MPa and the mass flux range of 1000–5000 kg·m<sup>−2</sup>·s<sup>−1</sup>. The closures of the two-phase equation were compared and the applicability of R12 was discussed. Meanwhile, sensitivity analyses were conducted on the models for bubble departure diameter, lift force, and turbulent dispersion force. The Kocamustafaogullari model was selected for calculating bubble departure diameter. According to the cross-sectional average void fraction, the appropriate selection criteria for the effective turbulent Prandtl number model was recommended. An abnormal upward trend of void fraction near the wall was observed for <em>G</em> ≥ 3000 kg·m<sup>−2</sup>·s<sup>−1</sup> due to the small or even negative relative velocity rather than the lift force coefficient model. A new lift force coefficient model relevant to pressure, mass flux, and void fraction has been proposed. The new CFD model combination demonstrated a good agreement with the experiment, providing an effective tool for analyzing the radial void fraction distribution.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8006,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Nuclear Energy","volume":"219 ","pages":"Article 111445"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Nuclear Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306454925002622","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Accurate prediction of void fraction distribution in flow boiling is of great significance for the thermal–hydraulic analysis and safety of nuclear power plants. Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) methods have consistently proven to be effective for boiling simulation. Due to the complexity of boiling phenomena, the prediction of radial void fraction distribution in tubes tends to be challenging, thus hindering a clear understanding of the underlying mechanism. In this work, with the aim of achieving the void fraction prediction over a wide range, the DEBORA experiment operated with R12 was simulated within the pressure range of 1.46–3 MPa and the mass flux range of 1000–5000 kg·m−2·s−1. The closures of the two-phase equation were compared and the applicability of R12 was discussed. Meanwhile, sensitivity analyses were conducted on the models for bubble departure diameter, lift force, and turbulent dispersion force. The Kocamustafaogullari model was selected for calculating bubble departure diameter. According to the cross-sectional average void fraction, the appropriate selection criteria for the effective turbulent Prandtl number model was recommended. An abnormal upward trend of void fraction near the wall was observed for G ≥ 3000 kg·m−2·s−1 due to the small or even negative relative velocity rather than the lift force coefficient model. A new lift force coefficient model relevant to pressure, mass flux, and void fraction has been proposed. The new CFD model combination demonstrated a good agreement with the experiment, providing an effective tool for analyzing the radial void fraction distribution.
期刊介绍:
Annals of Nuclear Energy provides an international medium for the communication of original research, ideas and developments in all areas of the field of nuclear energy science and technology. Its scope embraces nuclear fuel reserves, fuel cycles and cost, materials, processing, system and component technology (fission only), design and optimization, direct conversion of nuclear energy sources, environmental control, reactor physics, heat transfer and fluid dynamics, structural analysis, fuel management, future developments, nuclear fuel and safety, nuclear aerosol, neutron physics, computer technology (both software and hardware), risk assessment, radioactive waste disposal and reactor thermal hydraulics. Papers submitted to Annals need to demonstrate a clear link to nuclear power generation/nuclear engineering. Papers which deal with pure nuclear physics, pure health physics, imaging, or attenuation and shielding properties of concretes and various geological materials are not within the scope of the journal. Also, papers that deal with policy or economics are not within the scope of the journal.