Pediatric Frailty: From concept to action – Advancing measurement, biomarkers, and clinical integration

Rosario Caruso, Arianna Magon
{"title":"Pediatric Frailty: From concept to action – Advancing measurement, biomarkers, and clinical integration","authors":"Rosario Caruso,&nbsp;Arianna Magon","doi":"10.1016/j.glmedi.2025.100195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Frailty in pediatric populations is an emerging but increasingly relevant construct that extends beyond physical vulnerability to encompass psychological, social, and developmental dimensions. Although initially conceptualized within gerontology, frailty has gained traction in pediatric healthcare, particularly as it pertains to children living with chronic illnesses, disabilities, or complex care needs. Yet, despite its growing clinical and scientific relevance, pediatric frailty remains an underdeveloped field, with ongoing challenges in its definition, measurement, and integration into practice. This letter outlines the historical evolution of pediatric frailty, identifying four key developmental phases: pre-reflective, reflective, definitional, and research. Initially used synonymously with vulnerability, frailty gradually evolved into an analytical framework supported by statistical modeling, and later became a clinically relevant concept tied to familial and psychological dimensions. The definitional phase saw frailty recognized in pediatric subspecialties, especially oncology and cardiology, with attention to inherited patterns and intergenerational health risks. In the current research phase, efforts have intensified to operationalize frailty through validated scores, biomarkers, and predictive indices tailored to pediatric populations. Notably, frailty is increasingly recognized as a dynamic and multidimensional syndrome that necessitates a broader perspective encompassing family systems and social determinants of health. Despite these advancements, significant gaps persist in the conceptual and methodological foundations of pediatric and familial frailty. There remains a pressing need to develop age-appropriate tools, validate longitudinal trajectories, and incorporate frailty screening into pediatric care pathways. Bridging the gap between conceptual insights and clinical implementation is crucial for enhancing outcomes for vulnerable children and their families. We call on the pediatric clinical communities to prioritize frailty as a core component of child health research and policy. Integrating psychosocial and developmental indicators alongside biological markers will enable early identification and targeted interventions. The evolution of frailty from a theoretical construct to a measurable, actionable clinical entity is within reach—provided future research continues to advance with precision, interdisciplinary collaboration, and patient-centered focus.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100804,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100195"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949916X25000192","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Frailty in pediatric populations is an emerging but increasingly relevant construct that extends beyond physical vulnerability to encompass psychological, social, and developmental dimensions. Although initially conceptualized within gerontology, frailty has gained traction in pediatric healthcare, particularly as it pertains to children living with chronic illnesses, disabilities, or complex care needs. Yet, despite its growing clinical and scientific relevance, pediatric frailty remains an underdeveloped field, with ongoing challenges in its definition, measurement, and integration into practice. This letter outlines the historical evolution of pediatric frailty, identifying four key developmental phases: pre-reflective, reflective, definitional, and research. Initially used synonymously with vulnerability, frailty gradually evolved into an analytical framework supported by statistical modeling, and later became a clinically relevant concept tied to familial and psychological dimensions. The definitional phase saw frailty recognized in pediatric subspecialties, especially oncology and cardiology, with attention to inherited patterns and intergenerational health risks. In the current research phase, efforts have intensified to operationalize frailty through validated scores, biomarkers, and predictive indices tailored to pediatric populations. Notably, frailty is increasingly recognized as a dynamic and multidimensional syndrome that necessitates a broader perspective encompassing family systems and social determinants of health. Despite these advancements, significant gaps persist in the conceptual and methodological foundations of pediatric and familial frailty. There remains a pressing need to develop age-appropriate tools, validate longitudinal trajectories, and incorporate frailty screening into pediatric care pathways. Bridging the gap between conceptual insights and clinical implementation is crucial for enhancing outcomes for vulnerable children and their families. We call on the pediatric clinical communities to prioritize frailty as a core component of child health research and policy. Integrating psychosocial and developmental indicators alongside biological markers will enable early identification and targeted interventions. The evolution of frailty from a theoretical construct to a measurable, actionable clinical entity is within reach—provided future research continues to advance with precision, interdisciplinary collaboration, and patient-centered focus.
儿科虚弱:从概念到行动--推进测量、生物标记和临床整合
在儿科人群中,虚弱是一个新兴的但日益相关的结构,它超越了身体上的脆弱,涵盖了心理、社会和发展方面。虽然虚弱最初是在老年学中概念化的,但在儿科医疗保健中已经获得了牵引力,特别是当它与患有慢性疾病、残疾或复杂护理需求的儿童有关时。然而,尽管其临床和科学相关性越来越大,儿童虚弱仍然是一个不发达的领域,在其定义,测量和整合到实践中面临着持续的挑战。这封信概述了儿童虚弱的历史演变,确定了四个关键的发展阶段:前反思、反思、定义和研究。脆弱最初被用作脆弱性的同义词,后来逐渐演变成一个由统计模型支持的分析框架,后来成为一个与家庭和心理维度相关的临床概念。在定义阶段,在儿科亚专科,特别是肿瘤学和心脏病学中认识到虚弱,并注意遗传模式和代际健康风险。在目前的研究阶段,通过针对儿科人群的有效评分、生物标志物和预测指标,已经加强了对脆弱性的操作。值得注意的是,人们日益认识到,脆弱是一种动态和多方面的综合症,需要从更广泛的角度来看待家庭制度和健康的社会决定因素。尽管取得了这些进展,但在儿童和家庭虚弱的概念和方法基础方面仍然存在重大差距。仍然迫切需要开发适合年龄的工具,验证纵向轨迹,并将虚弱筛查纳入儿科护理途径。弥合概念见解和临床实施之间的差距对于提高弱势儿童及其家庭的成果至关重要。我们呼吁儿科临床界优先考虑脆弱问题,将其作为儿童健康研究和政策的核心组成部分。将社会心理和发育指标与生物标志物结合起来,将有助于早期识别和有针对性的干预。如果未来的研究继续以精确、跨学科合作和以患者为中心的重点推进,虚弱从理论结构到可测量、可操作的临床实体的演变是触手可及的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信