Internal reductions or carbon offset: How to achieve triple benefits in a consumer market with environmental concerns

IF 9.8 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
Xue Wang, Deqing Ma, Jinsong Hu, Yun Liu
{"title":"Internal reductions or carbon offset: How to achieve triple benefits in a consumer market with environmental concerns","authors":"Xue Wang,&nbsp;Deqing Ma,&nbsp;Jinsong Hu,&nbsp;Yun Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.ijpe.2025.109624","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Green and low-carbon production and operation methods have steadily emerged as one of the primary determinants of the enterprise's competitiveness in a consumer market concerned with environmental issues. This study examines a company that manufactures a single product and has the option of internal reductions only or purchasing carbon offsets along with internal reductions to reduce the product's carbon footprint. We developed a model to characterize the dynamic properties of the product's carbon footprint. The study finds that the consumer's level of environmental concern and the price of carbon offset are the main considerations for the firm's decision to develop carbon reduction methods. Interestingly, internal reductions and the purchasing carbon offset are not simple substitutions. When the price of carbon offset is extremely low, the firm purchases carbon offsets instead spur greater internal reductions. Another counterintuitive finding is that the firm with higher initial greenhouse gases from the product has relatively lower mitigation efforts. In addition, we obtain conditions under which the firm realizes economic, social, and environmental benefits from carbon footprint reduction methods. Finally, we extend our analysis to a scenario of duopoly competition and obtain similar conclusions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14287,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Production Economics","volume":"285 ","pages":"Article 109624"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Production Economics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527325001094","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Green and low-carbon production and operation methods have steadily emerged as one of the primary determinants of the enterprise's competitiveness in a consumer market concerned with environmental issues. This study examines a company that manufactures a single product and has the option of internal reductions only or purchasing carbon offsets along with internal reductions to reduce the product's carbon footprint. We developed a model to characterize the dynamic properties of the product's carbon footprint. The study finds that the consumer's level of environmental concern and the price of carbon offset are the main considerations for the firm's decision to develop carbon reduction methods. Interestingly, internal reductions and the purchasing carbon offset are not simple substitutions. When the price of carbon offset is extremely low, the firm purchases carbon offsets instead spur greater internal reductions. Another counterintuitive finding is that the firm with higher initial greenhouse gases from the product has relatively lower mitigation efforts. In addition, we obtain conditions under which the firm realizes economic, social, and environmental benefits from carbon footprint reduction methods. Finally, we extend our analysis to a scenario of duopoly competition and obtain similar conclusions.
内部减排或碳抵消:如何在具有环境问题的消费市场中实现三重效益
在关注环境问题的消费市场中,绿色低碳的生产经营方式逐渐成为企业竞争力的主要决定因素之一。本研究考察了一家生产单一产品的公司,该公司可以选择仅内部减排或购买碳抵消以及内部减排以减少产品的碳足迹。我们开发了一个模型来描述产品碳足迹的动态特性。研究发现,消费者对环境的关注程度和碳补偿的价格是企业决定发展碳减排方法的主要考虑因素。有趣的是,内部减排和购买碳抵消并不是简单的替代。当碳补偿的价格极低时,企业购买碳补偿反而会刺激更大的内部减排。另一个违反直觉的发现是,产品产生的初始温室气体较高的公司,其减排努力相对较低。此外,我们还得到了企业从碳足迹减少方法中实现经济、社会和环境效益的条件。最后,我们将分析扩展到双寡头竞争的情况下,得到了类似的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Production Economics
International Journal of Production Economics 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
21.40
自引率
7.50%
发文量
266
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Production Economics focuses on the interface between engineering and management. It covers all aspects of manufacturing and process industries, as well as production in general. The journal is interdisciplinary, considering activities throughout the product life cycle and material flow cycle. It aims to disseminate knowledge for improving industrial practice and strengthening the theoretical base for decision making. The journal serves as a forum for exchanging ideas and presenting new developments in theory and application, combining academic standards with practical value for industrial applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信