Luca Fiorito , Lars Engelen , Federico Grimaldi , Pablo Romojaro
{"title":"Nuclear data uncertainty propagation in the ARIANE GU3 burnup model using SANDY: Comparison between a FA and a pincell model","authors":"Luca Fiorito , Lars Engelen , Federico Grimaldi , Pablo Romojaro","doi":"10.1016/j.anucene.2025.111423","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Nuclear data uncertainties taken from the general-purpose evaluated libraries JEFF-3.3, ENDF/B-VIII.0 and JENDL-4.0u are propagated through a depletion model of the ARIANE GU3 sample using the SANDY stochastic sampling code combined with the Monte Carlo burnup code SERPENT-2. This approach enabled an accurate characterization of the uncertainty in many nuclide concentrations, for which measurements exist from post-irradiation experiments.</div><div>Stochastic sampling methods for uncertainty propagation in Monte Carlo burnup calculations are notoriously computationally expensive. To address this, the contribution of nuclear data uncertainties to the model response was assessed independently of Monte Carlo uncertainties using a methodology based on conditional estimators. Interestingly, unlike best-estimate values, uncertainty estimates were found to be rather independent of model simplifications. This was demonstrated by comparing uncertainty results for the GU3 fuel assembly model and for a simplified pincell model. The possibility to transpose uncertainties between such models suggests that high assay data accuracy is not strictly necessary for uncertainty analyses. Finally, the variance decomposition analysis revealed gaps in the uncertainty datasets of major nuclear data libraries, leading to an underestimation of total uncertainties in burnup calculations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8006,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Nuclear Energy","volume":"218 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Nuclear Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306454925002403","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Nuclear data uncertainties taken from the general-purpose evaluated libraries JEFF-3.3, ENDF/B-VIII.0 and JENDL-4.0u are propagated through a depletion model of the ARIANE GU3 sample using the SANDY stochastic sampling code combined with the Monte Carlo burnup code SERPENT-2. This approach enabled an accurate characterization of the uncertainty in many nuclide concentrations, for which measurements exist from post-irradiation experiments.
Stochastic sampling methods for uncertainty propagation in Monte Carlo burnup calculations are notoriously computationally expensive. To address this, the contribution of nuclear data uncertainties to the model response was assessed independently of Monte Carlo uncertainties using a methodology based on conditional estimators. Interestingly, unlike best-estimate values, uncertainty estimates were found to be rather independent of model simplifications. This was demonstrated by comparing uncertainty results for the GU3 fuel assembly model and for a simplified pincell model. The possibility to transpose uncertainties between such models suggests that high assay data accuracy is not strictly necessary for uncertainty analyses. Finally, the variance decomposition analysis revealed gaps in the uncertainty datasets of major nuclear data libraries, leading to an underestimation of total uncertainties in burnup calculations.
期刊介绍:
Annals of Nuclear Energy provides an international medium for the communication of original research, ideas and developments in all areas of the field of nuclear energy science and technology. Its scope embraces nuclear fuel reserves, fuel cycles and cost, materials, processing, system and component technology (fission only), design and optimization, direct conversion of nuclear energy sources, environmental control, reactor physics, heat transfer and fluid dynamics, structural analysis, fuel management, future developments, nuclear fuel and safety, nuclear aerosol, neutron physics, computer technology (both software and hardware), risk assessment, radioactive waste disposal and reactor thermal hydraulics. Papers submitted to Annals need to demonstrate a clear link to nuclear power generation/nuclear engineering. Papers which deal with pure nuclear physics, pure health physics, imaging, or attenuation and shielding properties of concretes and various geological materials are not within the scope of the journal. Also, papers that deal with policy or economics are not within the scope of the journal.