Risk Prediction Tools for Estimating Surgical Difficulty and Perioperative and Postoperative Outcomes Including Morbidity for Major Urological Surgery: A Concept for the Future of Surgical Planning

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Christopher Soliman , Jochen Walz , Niall M. Corcoran , Patrick Y. Wuethrich , Nathan Lawrentschuk , Marc A. Furrer
{"title":"Risk Prediction Tools for Estimating Surgical Difficulty and Perioperative and Postoperative Outcomes Including Morbidity for Major Urological Surgery: A Concept for the Future of Surgical Planning","authors":"Christopher Soliman ,&nbsp;Jochen Walz ,&nbsp;Niall M. Corcoran ,&nbsp;Patrick Y. Wuethrich ,&nbsp;Nathan Lawrentschuk ,&nbsp;Marc A. Furrer","doi":"10.1016/j.euros.2025.03.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Risk assessment plays a critical role in surgical decision-making and influences patient care, resource allocation, surgical planning, and postoperative outcomes. Accurate stratification facilitates better treatment selection and planning, and identification of teaching cases. Existing tools such as POSSUM and the Surgical Apgar Score are widely used but focus primarily on general surgery and often lack urology-specific considerations or integration of intraoperative factors. Urological surgery requires a dedicated tool that accounts for preoperative factors (eg, prostate size, tumour extent), intraoperative findings (eg, fibrosis, adhesions), and patient-specific complexities. We propose a comprehensive scoring system for risk and surgical difficulty that ranges from 0 (no risk) to 100 (procedure abandonment or death) covering five parameter categories: preoperative patient characteristics; intraoperative patient factors; preoperative organ-specific parameters; intraoperative organ-specific factors; and unexpected postoperative conditions. The aims of the proposed system are to improve surgical planning, enhance risk prediction, and identify suitable teaching cases. By incorporating surgeon-specific factors such as case volume and learning curves, the system stratifies procedures by difficulty and can facilitate comparisons between surgeons and hospitals. The system can also promote transparency in patient counselling and may improve the quality of patient consent. Once validated, the scoring system could be integrated into standard practice to improve surgical care, resource allocation, and research efforts. Despite challenges such as comprehensive data collection, this tool offers significant potential to enhance surgical outcomes and multidisciplinary decision-making.</div></div><div><h3>Patient summary</h3><div>Risk assessment is essential in helping surgeons and anaesthetists to make better decisions before, during, and after surgery. The aim of our work is to create a tool that predicts potential risks and challenges during surgery and makes it easier to prepare for these challenges. This tool can improve management of resources and surgical planning, and may ensure smooth recovery after an operation. Finally, it could also help patients and their families to understand the potential risks involved, giving them clearer information about what to expect and making the process more transparent and reassuring.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12254,"journal":{"name":"European Urology Open Science","volume":"75 ","pages":"Pages 55-60"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Urology Open Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666168325000989","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Risk assessment plays a critical role in surgical decision-making and influences patient care, resource allocation, surgical planning, and postoperative outcomes. Accurate stratification facilitates better treatment selection and planning, and identification of teaching cases. Existing tools such as POSSUM and the Surgical Apgar Score are widely used but focus primarily on general surgery and often lack urology-specific considerations or integration of intraoperative factors. Urological surgery requires a dedicated tool that accounts for preoperative factors (eg, prostate size, tumour extent), intraoperative findings (eg, fibrosis, adhesions), and patient-specific complexities. We propose a comprehensive scoring system for risk and surgical difficulty that ranges from 0 (no risk) to 100 (procedure abandonment or death) covering five parameter categories: preoperative patient characteristics; intraoperative patient factors; preoperative organ-specific parameters; intraoperative organ-specific factors; and unexpected postoperative conditions. The aims of the proposed system are to improve surgical planning, enhance risk prediction, and identify suitable teaching cases. By incorporating surgeon-specific factors such as case volume and learning curves, the system stratifies procedures by difficulty and can facilitate comparisons between surgeons and hospitals. The system can also promote transparency in patient counselling and may improve the quality of patient consent. Once validated, the scoring system could be integrated into standard practice to improve surgical care, resource allocation, and research efforts. Despite challenges such as comprehensive data collection, this tool offers significant potential to enhance surgical outcomes and multidisciplinary decision-making.

Patient summary

Risk assessment is essential in helping surgeons and anaesthetists to make better decisions before, during, and after surgery. The aim of our work is to create a tool that predicts potential risks and challenges during surgery and makes it easier to prepare for these challenges. This tool can improve management of resources and surgical planning, and may ensure smooth recovery after an operation. Finally, it could also help patients and their families to understand the potential risks involved, giving them clearer information about what to expect and making the process more transparent and reassuring.
评估泌尿外科大手术手术难度、围手术期和术后结果(包括发病率)的风险预测工具:未来手术计划的概念
风险评估在手术决策中起着至关重要的作用,影响患者护理、资源分配、手术计划和术后结果。准确的分层有助于更好地选择和规划治疗方案,识别教学案例。现有的工具如POSSUM和外科Apgar评分被广泛使用,但主要集中在普外科,往往缺乏泌尿外科特异性考虑或术中因素的整合。泌尿外科手术需要一个专门的工具来考虑术前因素(如前列腺大小、肿瘤范围)、术中发现(如纤维化、粘连)和患者特异性复杂性。我们提出了一个综合的风险和手术难度评分系统,评分范围从0(无风险)到100(手术放弃或死亡),涵盖五个参数类别:术前患者特征;术中患者因素;术前器官特异性参数;术中器官特异性因素;以及意外的术后情况。该系统的目的是改进手术计划,增强风险预测,并确定合适的教学案例。通过结合外科医生的特定因素,如病例量和学习曲线,该系统按难度对手术进行分层,并便于外科医生和医院之间的比较。该系统还可以提高患者咨询的透明度,并可能提高患者同意的质量。一旦验证,评分系统可以整合到标准实践中,以改善手术护理、资源分配和研究工作。尽管存在诸如全面数据收集等挑战,但该工具具有提高手术结果和多学科决策的巨大潜力。患者总结风险评估对于帮助外科医生和麻醉师在手术前、手术中和手术后做出更好的决定至关重要。我们工作的目的是创造一种工具来预测手术过程中的潜在风险和挑战,并使其更容易为这些挑战做好准备。该工具可改善资源管理和手术计划,并可确保术后顺利恢复。最后,它还可以帮助患者及其家属了解所涉及的潜在风险,让他们更清楚地了解可能发生的情况,使整个过程更加透明和令人放心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Urology Open Science
European Urology Open Science UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
1183
审稿时长
49 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信