Joshua D. Brown MD, PhD, Babajide Owosela, Elizabeth A. Krupinski PhD, Brent D. Weinberg MD, PhD, Mark E. Mullins MD, PhD, Patricia Balthazar MD, MPH
{"title":"Progress and Impact of a Radiology Residency Research Track over 12 Years","authors":"Joshua D. Brown MD, PhD, Babajide Owosela, Elizabeth A. Krupinski PhD, Brent D. Weinberg MD, PhD, Mark E. Mullins MD, PhD, Patricia Balthazar MD, MPH","doi":"10.1016/j.acra.2024.09.025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Rationale and Objectives</h3><div>Radiology is a dynamic and ever-evolving field, necessitating research and innovation. However, the conventional medical training model falls short in fostering research skills, crucial for cultivating the upcoming cohort of physician-scientists. Our radiology residency research track (RT) was instituted to offer a dedicated research pathway, to foster the next generation of research-focused academic radiologists. The track provides an integrated 4-year longitudinal curriculum and academic time. This study assessed the impact and progress of our RT over 12 years.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Materials</h3><div>Using publicly available online data from Doximity, PubMed, and Scopus we collected information on all graduates from our Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology residency program graduation classes between 2010 and 2022, including most recent job position, position type (academic vs. private), and publications. We compared RT and non-research track (NRT) residents.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Out of 185 graduates, 179 profiles (97%) were retrievable, including all 13 RT residents. The average number of publications per resident during residency was 1.1 (186 total) for NRT graduates and 7.2 (93 total) for RT graduates (p < 0.001). Throughout their entire careers to date, NRT graduates averaged 7.3 publications per resident (1249 total), while RT graduates averaged 31.7 publications per resident (412 total) (p < 0.001). The average number of citations per graduate was 123 (21212 total) for NRT and 552 (7175 total) for RT (p < 0.001). Additionally, 36% of NRT graduates and 92% of RT graduates (p = 0.005) held academic job positions.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Residents from the radiology residency research track were more likely to assume academic positions and had a higher number of publications and citations per resident compared to their non-research track counterparts, suggesting the track serves as an effective pipeline for cultivating academic radiologists.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50928,"journal":{"name":"Academic Radiology","volume":"32 4","pages":"Pages 2334-2341"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1076633224006743","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Rationale and Objectives
Radiology is a dynamic and ever-evolving field, necessitating research and innovation. However, the conventional medical training model falls short in fostering research skills, crucial for cultivating the upcoming cohort of physician-scientists. Our radiology residency research track (RT) was instituted to offer a dedicated research pathway, to foster the next generation of research-focused academic radiologists. The track provides an integrated 4-year longitudinal curriculum and academic time. This study assessed the impact and progress of our RT over 12 years.
Materials and Materials
Using publicly available online data from Doximity, PubMed, and Scopus we collected information on all graduates from our Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology residency program graduation classes between 2010 and 2022, including most recent job position, position type (academic vs. private), and publications. We compared RT and non-research track (NRT) residents.
Results
Out of 185 graduates, 179 profiles (97%) were retrievable, including all 13 RT residents. The average number of publications per resident during residency was 1.1 (186 total) for NRT graduates and 7.2 (93 total) for RT graduates (p < 0.001). Throughout their entire careers to date, NRT graduates averaged 7.3 publications per resident (1249 total), while RT graduates averaged 31.7 publications per resident (412 total) (p < 0.001). The average number of citations per graduate was 123 (21212 total) for NRT and 552 (7175 total) for RT (p < 0.001). Additionally, 36% of NRT graduates and 92% of RT graduates (p = 0.005) held academic job positions.
Conclusion
Residents from the radiology residency research track were more likely to assume academic positions and had a higher number of publications and citations per resident compared to their non-research track counterparts, suggesting the track serves as an effective pipeline for cultivating academic radiologists.
期刊介绍:
Academic Radiology publishes original reports of clinical and laboratory investigations in diagnostic imaging, the diagnostic use of radioactive isotopes, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, digital subtraction angiography, image-guided interventions and related techniques. It also includes brief technical reports describing original observations, techniques, and instrumental developments; state-of-the-art reports on clinical issues, new technology and other topics of current medical importance; meta-analyses; scientific studies and opinions on radiologic education; and letters to the Editor.