Kathryn A. Szymanski BS , An T. Hoang BS , Dane Van Tassel MD , Paul Kang MS, MPH , Cory M. Pfeifer MD, MBA, MPH, MS
{"title":"On-Call Radiology Resident Preliminary Report Major Discrepancies: A Meta-analysis","authors":"Kathryn A. Szymanski BS , An T. Hoang BS , Dane Van Tassel MD , Paul Kang MS, MPH , Cory M. Pfeifer MD, MBA, MPH, MS","doi":"10.1016/j.acra.2025.01.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Rationale and Objectives</h3><div>Throughout their training, radiology residents frequently perform independent overnight call, with attendings overreading reports the following morning. Call shifts are a fundamental part of radiology resident training, offering independence that can improve decision-making skills and professional confidence. However, because errors have the potential to affect patient care, analysis of clinically significant errors is critical. This meta-analysis was performed to organize existing data on on-call resident preliminary report discrepancy rates and to compare rates across modalities and resident years.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>A PubMed search was performed in August 2024 using (\"resident report discrepancy\" OR (\"resident\" AND \"error\") OR \"preliminary\") AND \"radiology\" AND \"call”. Articles were included if they met the criteria, and relevant information was collected. Statistical analysis was performed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The PubMed search resulted in 107 articles, of which 20 met inclusion criteria. These studies included 616,918 preliminary reports. Pooled preliminary report major discrepancy rate (%) by modality was 0.64 for radiographs, 0.38 for US, 1.35 for CT, and 1.86 for MRI and by resident year was 1.27 for R1s, 1.05 for R2s, 0.88 for R3s, and 0.67 for R4s. The highest discrepancy rate was seen for R1s reading MRI (8.70%). The majority of papers included describe residents taking independent call, with only three having fellow or attending supervised call part of the time.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Radiology residents are valuable members of the healthcare team and demonstrate high accuracy during independent call shifts. Fellow or attending real-time supervision can shorten the time to final report, and whether a hospital implements this should be decided by analyzing its individual system. This analysis is limited by variability in the classification of major discrepancies and inability to further classify data by body region scanned. In light of this, we encourage standardization in future reporting.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50928,"journal":{"name":"Academic Radiology","volume":"32 4","pages":"Pages 2342-2356"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1076633225000157","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Rationale and Objectives
Throughout their training, radiology residents frequently perform independent overnight call, with attendings overreading reports the following morning. Call shifts are a fundamental part of radiology resident training, offering independence that can improve decision-making skills and professional confidence. However, because errors have the potential to affect patient care, analysis of clinically significant errors is critical. This meta-analysis was performed to organize existing data on on-call resident preliminary report discrepancy rates and to compare rates across modalities and resident years.
Materials and Methods
A PubMed search was performed in August 2024 using ("resident report discrepancy" OR ("resident" AND "error") OR "preliminary") AND "radiology" AND "call”. Articles were included if they met the criteria, and relevant information was collected. Statistical analysis was performed.
Results
The PubMed search resulted in 107 articles, of which 20 met inclusion criteria. These studies included 616,918 preliminary reports. Pooled preliminary report major discrepancy rate (%) by modality was 0.64 for radiographs, 0.38 for US, 1.35 for CT, and 1.86 for MRI and by resident year was 1.27 for R1s, 1.05 for R2s, 0.88 for R3s, and 0.67 for R4s. The highest discrepancy rate was seen for R1s reading MRI (8.70%). The majority of papers included describe residents taking independent call, with only three having fellow or attending supervised call part of the time.
Conclusion
Radiology residents are valuable members of the healthcare team and demonstrate high accuracy during independent call shifts. Fellow or attending real-time supervision can shorten the time to final report, and whether a hospital implements this should be decided by analyzing its individual system. This analysis is limited by variability in the classification of major discrepancies and inability to further classify data by body region scanned. In light of this, we encourage standardization in future reporting.
期刊介绍:
Academic Radiology publishes original reports of clinical and laboratory investigations in diagnostic imaging, the diagnostic use of radioactive isotopes, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, digital subtraction angiography, image-guided interventions and related techniques. It also includes brief technical reports describing original observations, techniques, and instrumental developments; state-of-the-art reports on clinical issues, new technology and other topics of current medical importance; meta-analyses; scientific studies and opinions on radiologic education; and letters to the Editor.