Optimising peri-operative intravenous lidocaine dosing regimens

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Anaesthesia Pub Date : 2025-04-06 DOI:10.1111/anae.16611
Angela Tognolini, Jason A. Roberts, Victoria A. Eley
{"title":"Optimising peri-operative intravenous lidocaine dosing regimens","authors":"Angela Tognolini, Jason A. Roberts, Victoria A. Eley","doi":"10.1111/anae.16611","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We thank Dr Hansel for his interest and comments [<span>1</span>] related to our publication [<span>2</span>]. This discussion highlights the ongoing debate regarding dosing of intravenous lidocaine infusions and ongoing concerns with the lack of safety data. The aim of our observational pharmacokinetic study and dosing simulations was to improve the understanding of intravenous lidocaine pharmacokinetics and, ultimately, to improve safety and efficacy of dosing of this commonly used (albeit ‘off-label’) peri-operative drug.</p>\n<p>We acknowledge this is a simulated regimen that requires external validation and evaluation in the clinical setting for safety and efficacy. Our proposed simulated dose regimen is specific to our studied population, carefully considers covariates and body weight metrics, and shows (simulated) concentrations &lt; 5 μg.ml<sup>-1</sup>. Our proposed dosing aligns with other regimens used clinically, with infusions ranging from 1–5 mg.kg<sup>-1</sup>.h<sup>-1</sup> [<span>3, 4</span>]. Importantly, in patients with obesity, dosing should be adjusted based on lean body weight. We have not examined infusions &gt; 3 h and have not made any comments regarding postoperative dosing and administration.</p>\n<p>The use of intravenous lidocaine for peri-operative pain management is common in Australia and parts of the UK. We agree that it requires careful individual patient assessment of risk vs. benefit, should consider the clinical context, and close monitoring is required to pick up adverse events. Consensus statements, such as that published by Foo et al. [<span>5</span>] and focused on postoperative lidocaine infusions, can be a useful guide for clinicians. Ensuring patient safety is paramount and, with intra-operative administration, intravenous lidocaine can be delivered carefully and monitored by the anaesthetist. Large anaesthesia incident reporting systems, such as WebAIRS in Australia, remain important in identifying safety data related to infrequent anaesthesia-related events, but are limited by reliance on self-reporting.</p>\n<p>We agree with Hansel and others [<span>6</span>] that robust evidence is needed through large clinical trials with carefully considered safety and outcome measures. We believe dosing strategies such as those proposed in this study may help enable optimal peri-operative use of intravenous lidocaine infusions and look forward to prospective evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":7742,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.16611","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We thank Dr Hansel for his interest and comments [1] related to our publication [2]. This discussion highlights the ongoing debate regarding dosing of intravenous lidocaine infusions and ongoing concerns with the lack of safety data. The aim of our observational pharmacokinetic study and dosing simulations was to improve the understanding of intravenous lidocaine pharmacokinetics and, ultimately, to improve safety and efficacy of dosing of this commonly used (albeit ‘off-label’) peri-operative drug.

We acknowledge this is a simulated regimen that requires external validation and evaluation in the clinical setting for safety and efficacy. Our proposed simulated dose regimen is specific to our studied population, carefully considers covariates and body weight metrics, and shows (simulated) concentrations < 5 μg.ml-1. Our proposed dosing aligns with other regimens used clinically, with infusions ranging from 1–5 mg.kg-1.h-1 [3, 4]. Importantly, in patients with obesity, dosing should be adjusted based on lean body weight. We have not examined infusions > 3 h and have not made any comments regarding postoperative dosing and administration.

The use of intravenous lidocaine for peri-operative pain management is common in Australia and parts of the UK. We agree that it requires careful individual patient assessment of risk vs. benefit, should consider the clinical context, and close monitoring is required to pick up adverse events. Consensus statements, such as that published by Foo et al. [5] and focused on postoperative lidocaine infusions, can be a useful guide for clinicians. Ensuring patient safety is paramount and, with intra-operative administration, intravenous lidocaine can be delivered carefully and monitored by the anaesthetist. Large anaesthesia incident reporting systems, such as WebAIRS in Australia, remain important in identifying safety data related to infrequent anaesthesia-related events, but are limited by reliance on self-reporting.

We agree with Hansel and others [6] that robust evidence is needed through large clinical trials with carefully considered safety and outcome measures. We believe dosing strategies such as those proposed in this study may help enable optimal peri-operative use of intravenous lidocaine infusions and look forward to prospective evaluation.

优化围手术期静脉注射利多卡因给药方案
我们感谢Hansel博士对我们的出版物b[2]的关注和评论。这一讨论强调了关于静脉注射利多卡因剂量的持续争论以及对缺乏安全性数据的持续关注。我们的观察性药代动力学研究和剂量模拟的目的是提高对静脉注射利多卡因药代动力学的理解,并最终提高这种常用(尽管“超说明书”)围手术期药物剂量的安全性和有效性。我们承认这是一个模拟方案,需要在临床环境中进行安全性和有效性的外部验证和评估。我们提出的模拟剂量方案是针对我们研究的人群,仔细考虑协变量和体重指标,并显示(模拟)浓度<; 5 μg.ml-1。我们建议的剂量与临床使用的其他方案一致,输注范围为1-5 mg.kg-1.h-1[3,4]。重要的是,对于肥胖患者,应根据瘦体重调整剂量。我们没有检查输注>; 3小时,也没有对术后给药和给药作出任何评论。静脉注射利多卡因用于围手术期疼痛管理在澳大利亚和英国部分地区很常见。我们同意需要仔细的个体患者风险与获益评估,应考虑临床情况,并需要密切监测以发现不良事件。共识声明,如Foo等人发表的关于术后利多卡因输注的共识声明,可以为临床医生提供有用的指导。确保患者安全是最重要的,在术中给药时,静脉注射利多卡因时要小心,并由麻醉师监督。大型麻醉事件报告系统,如澳大利亚的WebAIRS,在识别与不频繁的麻醉相关事件相关的安全数据方面仍然很重要,但由于依赖于自我报告而受到限制。我们同意Hansel和其他人的观点,需要通过大规模临床试验来提供强有力的证据,并仔细考虑安全性和结果措施。我们相信本研究中提出的剂量策略可能有助于优化围手术期静脉输注利多卡因的使用,并期待前瞻性评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anaesthesia
Anaesthesia 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
21.20
自引率
9.30%
发文量
300
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The official journal of the Association of Anaesthetists is Anaesthesia. It is a comprehensive international publication that covers a wide range of topics. The journal focuses on general and regional anaesthesia, as well as intensive care and pain therapy. It includes original articles that have undergone peer review, covering all aspects of these fields, including research on equipment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信