Deep learning-based estimation of respiration-induced deformation from surface motion: A proof-of-concept study on 4D thoracic image synthesis.

Medical physics Pub Date : 2025-04-05 DOI:10.1002/mp.17804
Jie Zhang, Xue Bai, Guoping Shan
{"title":"Deep learning-based estimation of respiration-induced deformation from surface motion: A proof-of-concept study on 4D thoracic image synthesis.","authors":"Jie Zhang, Xue Bai, Guoping Shan","doi":"10.1002/mp.17804","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Four-dimension computed tomography (4D-CT) provides important respiration-related information for thoracic radiotherapy. Its quality is challenged by various respiratory patterns. Its acquisition gives rise to the risk of higher radiation exposure. Based on a continuously estimated deformation, a 4D synthesis by warping a high-quality volumetric image is a possible solution.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To propose a non-patient-specific cascaded ensemble model (CEM) to estimate respiration-induced thoracic tissue deformation from surface motion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The CEM is cascaded by three deep learning-based models. By inputting the surface motion, CEM outputs a deformation vector field (DVF) inside thorax. In our work, the surface motion was simulated using the body contours derived from 4D-CT. The CEM was trained on our private database including 62 4D-CT sets, and was tested on a public database encompassing 80 4D-CT sets. To evaluate CEM, we employed the model output DVF to generate a few series of synthesized CTs, and compared them with the ground truth. CEM was also compared with other published works.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CEM synthesized CT with an mRMSE (average root mean square error) of 61.06 ± 10.43HU (average ± standard deviation), an mSSIM (average structural similarity index measure) of 0.990 ± 0.004, and an mMAE (average mean absolute error) of 26.80 ± 5.65HU. Compared with other works, CEM showed the best result.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results demonstrated the effectiveness of CEM on estimating tissue DVF inside thorax. CEM requires no patient-specific breathing data sampling and no additional training before treatment. It shows potential for broad applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":94136,"journal":{"name":"Medical physics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.17804","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Four-dimension computed tomography (4D-CT) provides important respiration-related information for thoracic radiotherapy. Its quality is challenged by various respiratory patterns. Its acquisition gives rise to the risk of higher radiation exposure. Based on a continuously estimated deformation, a 4D synthesis by warping a high-quality volumetric image is a possible solution.

Purpose: To propose a non-patient-specific cascaded ensemble model (CEM) to estimate respiration-induced thoracic tissue deformation from surface motion.

Methods: The CEM is cascaded by three deep learning-based models. By inputting the surface motion, CEM outputs a deformation vector field (DVF) inside thorax. In our work, the surface motion was simulated using the body contours derived from 4D-CT. The CEM was trained on our private database including 62 4D-CT sets, and was tested on a public database encompassing 80 4D-CT sets. To evaluate CEM, we employed the model output DVF to generate a few series of synthesized CTs, and compared them with the ground truth. CEM was also compared with other published works.

Results: CEM synthesized CT with an mRMSE (average root mean square error) of 61.06 ± 10.43HU (average ± standard deviation), an mSSIM (average structural similarity index measure) of 0.990 ± 0.004, and an mMAE (average mean absolute error) of 26.80 ± 5.65HU. Compared with other works, CEM showed the best result.

Conclusions: The results demonstrated the effectiveness of CEM on estimating tissue DVF inside thorax. CEM requires no patient-specific breathing data sampling and no additional training before treatment. It shows potential for broad applications.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信