Different strategies in de-escalation of axillary surgery in node-positive breast cancer following neoadjuvant treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis of long-term outcomes.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Breast Cancer Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-05 DOI:10.1007/s12282-025-01692-9
Vivian Man, Jiaxu Duan, Wing-Pan Luk, Ling-Hiu Fung, Ava Kwong
{"title":"Different strategies in de-escalation of axillary surgery in node-positive breast cancer following neoadjuvant treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis of long-term outcomes.","authors":"Vivian Man, Jiaxu Duan, Wing-Pan Luk, Ling-Hiu Fung, Ava Kwong","doi":"10.1007/s12282-025-01692-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Different surgical options existed in the management of axilla among breast cancer patients who were initially node-positive and were converted node-negative after neoadjuvant systemic treatment (NST). De-escalation of axillary surgery was feasible, but previous studies focused on the false-negative rate (FNR) of respective procedures. The aim of this study is to evaluate the oncological outcomes of sentinel lymph-node biopsy (SLNB), MARI procedure, and targeted axillary dissection (TAD).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane library literature databases were searched systematically. Studies were eligible if they addressed the axillary recurrence rate of patients with nodal pathological complete response (pCR) and omission of axillary lymph-node dissection (ALND) after NST. Pooled analysis was performed using inverse variance methods for logit transformed proportions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven retrospective studies and three prospective studies involving 4268 patients with node-positive breast cancers were included. A total of 1650 patients achieved nodal pCR and avoided ALND, 1382 patients with SLNB only and 268 patients with MARI/TAD. The pooled estimate of axillary recurrence was 2.1% (95%CI 1.4-3.2%) for patients with negative SLNB and 1.5% (95% CI 0.5-4.1%) for patients with negative MARI/TAD. There was no significant benefit of ALND over SLNB in patients with nodal pCR after NST. Pooled estimates of 5-year DFS, DDFS, and OS of SLNB alone were 0.87 (95% CI 0.83-0.90], 0.90 (95% CI 0.88-0.92), and 0.92 (95% CI 0.88-0.94), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Breast cancer patients who are converted node-negative after NST have extremely low nodal recurrence rate, irrespective of the choice of axillary surgery. Omission of ALND is oncologically safe in patients who have nodal pCR after NST.</p>","PeriodicalId":56083,"journal":{"name":"Breast Cancer","volume":" ","pages":"638-653"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12174186/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-025-01692-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Different surgical options existed in the management of axilla among breast cancer patients who were initially node-positive and were converted node-negative after neoadjuvant systemic treatment (NST). De-escalation of axillary surgery was feasible, but previous studies focused on the false-negative rate (FNR) of respective procedures. The aim of this study is to evaluate the oncological outcomes of sentinel lymph-node biopsy (SLNB), MARI procedure, and targeted axillary dissection (TAD).

Patients and methods: PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane library literature databases were searched systematically. Studies were eligible if they addressed the axillary recurrence rate of patients with nodal pathological complete response (pCR) and omission of axillary lymph-node dissection (ALND) after NST. Pooled analysis was performed using inverse variance methods for logit transformed proportions.

Results: Eleven retrospective studies and three prospective studies involving 4268 patients with node-positive breast cancers were included. A total of 1650 patients achieved nodal pCR and avoided ALND, 1382 patients with SLNB only and 268 patients with MARI/TAD. The pooled estimate of axillary recurrence was 2.1% (95%CI 1.4-3.2%) for patients with negative SLNB and 1.5% (95% CI 0.5-4.1%) for patients with negative MARI/TAD. There was no significant benefit of ALND over SLNB in patients with nodal pCR after NST. Pooled estimates of 5-year DFS, DDFS, and OS of SLNB alone were 0.87 (95% CI 0.83-0.90], 0.90 (95% CI 0.88-0.92), and 0.92 (95% CI 0.88-0.94), respectively.

Conclusion: Breast cancer patients who are converted node-negative after NST have extremely low nodal recurrence rate, irrespective of the choice of axillary surgery. Omission of ALND is oncologically safe in patients who have nodal pCR after NST.

淋巴结阳性乳腺癌新辅助治疗后腋窝手术降低风险的不同策略:长期结果的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:在新辅助全身治疗(NST)后最初淋巴结阳性转为淋巴结阴性的乳腺癌患者中,腋窝的手术治疗存在不同的选择。腋窝手术的降级是可行的,但以往的研究主要集中在各自手术的假阴性率(FNR)上。本研究的目的是评估前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)、MARI手术和靶向腋窝清扫(TAD)的肿瘤学结果。患者和方法:系统检索PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆文献数据库。如果研究涉及淋巴结病理完全缓解(pCR)患者的腋窝复发率和遗漏腋窝淋巴结清扫(ALND),则研究是合格的。采用反方差法对logit变换比例进行了合并分析。结果:纳入了11项回顾性研究和3项前瞻性研究,涉及4268例淋巴结阳性乳腺癌患者。1650例患者实现了淋巴结pCR并避免了ALND, 1382例仅为SLNB, 268例为MARI/TAD。SLNB阴性患者腋窝复发率为2.1% (95%CI 1.4-3.2%), MARI/TAD阴性患者腋窝复发率为1.5% (95%CI 0.5-4.1%)。在NST后淋巴结pCR患者中,ALND与SLNB相比没有明显的益处。单独SLNB的5年DFS、DDFS和OS的汇总估计分别为0.87 (95% CI 0.83-0.90)、0.90 (95% CI 0.88-0.92)和0.92 (95% CI 0.88-0.94)。结论:无论选择何种腋窝手术,NST术后淋巴结阴性转化的乳腺癌患者的淋巴结复发率极低。在NST术后淋巴结pCR患者中,遗漏ALND在肿瘤学上是安全的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Breast Cancer
Breast Cancer ONCOLOGY-OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.50%
发文量
105
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Breast Cancer, the official journal of the Japanese Breast Cancer Society, publishes articles that contribute to progress in the field, in basic or translational research and also in clinical research, seeking to develop a new focus and new perspectives for all who are concerned with breast cancer. The journal welcomes all original articles describing clinical and epidemiological studies and laboratory investigations regarding breast cancer and related diseases. The journal will consider five types of articles: editorials, review articles, original articles, case reports, and rapid communications. Although editorials and review articles will principally be solicited by the editors, they can also be submitted for peer review, as in the case of original articles. The journal provides the best of up-to-date information on breast cancer, presenting readers with high-impact, original work focusing on pivotal issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信