Time, money, and weight loss: a qualitative study exploring patients' perspectives on randomization for bariatric surgery vs. an intensive non-surgical weight loss program.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Trials Pub Date : 2025-04-04 DOI:10.1186/s13063-025-08816-8
Sofie Amalie Tomova-Olsen, Marius Brostrøm Kousgaard, Katrine Tranberg Jensen, Susanne Reventlow, Ann-Kathrin Lindahl Christiansen, Kirstine Nyvold Bojsen-Møller, Carsten Dirksen, Gritt Overbeck
{"title":"Time, money, and weight loss: a qualitative study exploring patients' perspectives on randomization for bariatric surgery vs. an intensive non-surgical weight loss program.","authors":"Sofie Amalie Tomova-Olsen, Marius Brostrøm Kousgaard, Katrine Tranberg Jensen, Susanne Reventlow, Ann-Kathrin Lindahl Christiansen, Kirstine Nyvold Bojsen-Møller, Carsten Dirksen, Gritt Overbeck","doi":"10.1186/s13063-025-08816-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are foundational in advancing medical knowledge and patient care, offering high-quality evidence on the comparative effectiveness of healthcare interventions. However, a common challenge for RCTs is the recruitment of trial participants. To understand and overcome potential obstacles in recruitment for a clinical trial (the LightBAR trial, NCT06309238) comparing the effectiveness of bariatric surgery versus an intensive weight loss program, a qualitative study was conducted.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nine patients from the public bariatric surgery waiting list participated in focus groups at a hospital in the Capital Region of Denmark. Vignette scenarios were utilized to prompt participants to reflect on barriers and facilitators for participation. Three patients participated in a follow-up interview. Data was analyzed using thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis revealed four main themes: (1) having waited long for surgery reduced participants' willingness to be randomized; (2) the cost of weight loss medication was a major concern for participants; (3) participants were concerned about the extra work involved in program participation; and (4) participants weighed the efficacy and potential negative side effects of surgery against those of an intensive weight loss program based on personal beliefs and experiences.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Tailoring the recruitment strategy to patients' circumstances and concerns, and providing clear, patient-centered communication about the nature and potential implications of participating in the trial may improve recruitment success.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The LightBAR trial (NCT06309238). Registered on ClinicalTrials.gov on May 2, 2024.</p>","PeriodicalId":23333,"journal":{"name":"Trials","volume":"26 1","pages":"121"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11971855/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-025-08816-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are foundational in advancing medical knowledge and patient care, offering high-quality evidence on the comparative effectiveness of healthcare interventions. However, a common challenge for RCTs is the recruitment of trial participants. To understand and overcome potential obstacles in recruitment for a clinical trial (the LightBAR trial, NCT06309238) comparing the effectiveness of bariatric surgery versus an intensive weight loss program, a qualitative study was conducted.

Methods: Nine patients from the public bariatric surgery waiting list participated in focus groups at a hospital in the Capital Region of Denmark. Vignette scenarios were utilized to prompt participants to reflect on barriers and facilitators for participation. Three patients participated in a follow-up interview. Data was analyzed using thematic analysis.

Results: Analysis revealed four main themes: (1) having waited long for surgery reduced participants' willingness to be randomized; (2) the cost of weight loss medication was a major concern for participants; (3) participants were concerned about the extra work involved in program participation; and (4) participants weighed the efficacy and potential negative side effects of surgery against those of an intensive weight loss program based on personal beliefs and experiences.

Conclusions: Tailoring the recruitment strategy to patients' circumstances and concerns, and providing clear, patient-centered communication about the nature and potential implications of participating in the trial may improve recruitment success.

Trial registration: The LightBAR trial (NCT06309238). Registered on ClinicalTrials.gov on May 2, 2024.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Trials
Trials 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.00%
发文量
966
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Trials is an open access, peer-reviewed, online journal that will encompass all aspects of the performance and findings of randomized controlled trials. Trials will experiment with, and then refine, innovative approaches to improving communication about trials. We are keen to move beyond publishing traditional trial results articles (although these will be included). We believe this represents an exciting opportunity to advance the science and reporting of trials. Prior to 2006, Trials was published as Current Controlled Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine (CCTCVM). All published CCTCVM articles are available via the Trials website and citations to CCTCVM article URLs will continue to be supported.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信