Effect of local anesthetic volume for popliteal plexus block on motor nerve conduction and muscle function in the leg: a randomized clinical trial in healthy volunteers.

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Johan Kløvgaard Sørensen, Ulrik Grevstad, Erisela Qerama, Line Stenholt Bruun, Lone Nikolajsen, Charlotte Runge
{"title":"Effect of local anesthetic volume for popliteal plexus block on motor nerve conduction and muscle function in the leg: a randomized clinical trial in healthy volunteers.","authors":"Johan Kløvgaard Sørensen, Ulrik Grevstad, Erisela Qerama, Line Stenholt Bruun, Lone Nikolajsen, Charlotte Runge","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2025-106557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Popliteal plexus block (PPB) has shown moderate improvements in multimodal analgesia following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) while preserving motor function. However, the optimal analgesic volume for PPB remains unknown, and concerns exist regarding potential volume-dependent motor nerve involvement. This study investigates whether increasing the volume of local anesthetic for PPB affects muscle function and motor nerve involvement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this randomized, controlled, blinded trial, 40 healthy volunteers received one active nerve block and one sham block in each leg. Participants were randomized into three PPB groups receiving 10 mL, 20 mL, or 30 mL of 1% lidocaine, with 20 observations per group. Additionally, 10 femoral nerve blocks and 10 sciatic nerve blocks were included as reference groups to confirm motor nerve involvement. The primary outcome was relative changes in maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) of ankle plantar- and dorsiflexion. Secondary outcomes included relative changes in MVIC of knee extension, relative changes in compound muscle action potential of the gastrocnemius, anterior tibial, vastus medialis, and vastus lateralis muscles and frequency of saphenous nerve involvement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences in motor function between the three PPB groups for any MVIC measures (p≥0.1). Compound muscle action potential changes did not indicate clinically relevant motor nerve involvement across PPB groups. Saphenous nerve involvement was inconsistent, affecting 40% (10 mL), 40% (20 mL), and 60% (30 mL) of cases (p=0.3), suggesting ineffective sensory block of the femoral nerve's medial knee contributions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Increasing the volume of local anesthetic for PPB does not impair muscle function or significantly involve motor nerves, supporting its motor-sparing efficacy. PPB inconsistently affects the femoral nerve's sensory contributions to the knee, emphasizing its role as an adjunct to femoral triangle or adductor canal blocks in clinical practice. Concerns of muscle impairment should not hinder future clinical trials from exploration of the optimal analgesic volume for PPB.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT05464862.</p>","PeriodicalId":54503,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2025-106557","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Popliteal plexus block (PPB) has shown moderate improvements in multimodal analgesia following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) while preserving motor function. However, the optimal analgesic volume for PPB remains unknown, and concerns exist regarding potential volume-dependent motor nerve involvement. This study investigates whether increasing the volume of local anesthetic for PPB affects muscle function and motor nerve involvement.

Methods: In this randomized, controlled, blinded trial, 40 healthy volunteers received one active nerve block and one sham block in each leg. Participants were randomized into three PPB groups receiving 10 mL, 20 mL, or 30 mL of 1% lidocaine, with 20 observations per group. Additionally, 10 femoral nerve blocks and 10 sciatic nerve blocks were included as reference groups to confirm motor nerve involvement. The primary outcome was relative changes in maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) of ankle plantar- and dorsiflexion. Secondary outcomes included relative changes in MVIC of knee extension, relative changes in compound muscle action potential of the gastrocnemius, anterior tibial, vastus medialis, and vastus lateralis muscles and frequency of saphenous nerve involvement.

Results: There were no significant differences in motor function between the three PPB groups for any MVIC measures (p≥0.1). Compound muscle action potential changes did not indicate clinically relevant motor nerve involvement across PPB groups. Saphenous nerve involvement was inconsistent, affecting 40% (10 mL), 40% (20 mL), and 60% (30 mL) of cases (p=0.3), suggesting ineffective sensory block of the femoral nerve's medial knee contributions.

Conclusion: Increasing the volume of local anesthetic for PPB does not impair muscle function or significantly involve motor nerves, supporting its motor-sparing efficacy. PPB inconsistently affects the femoral nerve's sensory contributions to the knee, emphasizing its role as an adjunct to femoral triangle or adductor canal blocks in clinical practice. Concerns of muscle impairment should not hinder future clinical trials from exploration of the optimal analgesic volume for PPB.

Trial registration number: NCT05464862.

背景和目的:腘绳丛阻滞(PPB)可适度改善全膝关节置换术(TKA)后的多模式镇痛,同时保留运动功能。然而,PPB 的最佳镇痛容积仍是未知数,而且存在着对潜在容积依赖性运动神经受累的担忧。本研究探讨了增加 PPB 局麻药用量是否会影响肌肉功能和运动神经受累:在这项随机、对照、盲法试验中,40 名健康志愿者每条腿分别接受了一次主动神经阻滞和一次假阻滞。参与者被随机分为三组,分别接受 10 毫升、20 毫升或 30 毫升 1%利多卡因的 PPB 治疗,每组观察 20 次。此外,还包括 10 个股神经阻滞组和 10 个坐骨神经阻滞组作为参照组,以确认运动神经是否受累。主要结果是踝关节跖屈和背屈的最大自主等长收缩(MVIC)的相对变化。次要结果包括膝关节伸展时最大自主等长收缩力(MVIC)的相对变化,腓肠肌、胫骨前肌、内侧肌和外侧肌复合肌肉动作电位的相对变化,以及隐神经受累的频率:在任何 MVIC 测量指标上,三个 PPB 组的运动功能均无明显差异(P≥0.1)。各 PPB 组的复合肌肉动作电位变化并未显示临床相关的运动神经受累情况。隐神经受累情况不一致,40%(10 mL)、40%(20 mL)和 60%(30 mL)的病例受到影响(P=0.3),这表明股神经对膝关节内侧的感觉阻滞效果不佳:结论:增加 PPB 的局麻药用量不会损害肌肉功能,也不会明显累及运动神经,这支持了其保护运动神经的功效。PPB 对股神经对膝关节感觉的影响并不一致,这就强调了它在临床实践中作为股三角区或内收肌管阻滞的辅助手段的作用。对肌肉损伤的担忧不应妨碍未来临床试验对 PPB 最佳镇痛剂量的探索:NCT05464862.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
175
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, the official publication of the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA), is a monthly journal that publishes peer-reviewed scientific and clinical studies to advance the understanding and clinical application of regional techniques for surgical anesthesia and postoperative analgesia. Coverage includes intraoperative regional techniques, perioperative pain, chronic pain, obstetric anesthesia, pediatric anesthesia, outcome studies, and complications. Published for over thirty years, this respected journal also serves as the official publication of the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy (ESRA), the Asian and Oceanic Society of Regional Anesthesia (AOSRA), the Latin American Society of Regional Anesthesia (LASRA), the African Society for Regional Anesthesia (AFSRA), and the Academy of Regional Anaesthesia of India (AORA).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信