[Use of qualitative evidence syntheses in health services research in German-speaking countries: results of an online survey].

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Angélique Herrler, Veronika Lentsch, Yvonne Eisenmann, Ralph Möhler
{"title":"[Use of qualitative evidence syntheses in health services research in German-speaking countries: results of an online survey].","authors":"Angélique Herrler, Veronika Lentsch, Yvonne Eisenmann, Ralph Möhler","doi":"10.1055/a-2549-0493","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Qualitative evidence syntheses (QES) can answer qualitative research questions across different studies and thus offer an important part in the collection of evidence. While QES are a common set of methods internationally, they appear to be little used in health services research in the German-speaking countries to date.The aim of the study was to analyse the current use of QES in health services research in the German-speaking countries in order to draw conclusions for their establishment.An online survey was conducted by the subgroup Qualitative Evidence Syntheses in the German Network Health Services Research. The survey was aimed at health services researchers in German-speaking countries. Among other things, experiences with QES as well as barriers and support factors during implementation were surveyed. The data were analysed using descriptive statistics and content-structuring qualitative content analysis.A total of n=103 people took part in the survey, n=45 of whom had already been involved in QES. They had used QES to analyse the perspectives of target groups, to describe and evaluate health care, to (further) develop models and concepts and to implement and evaluate interventions. The participants referred to the high added value of QES, particularly due to its practical relevance, as well as to methodological difficulties in implementation and the desire for better training programmes.Qualitative evidence syntheses offer a potential that is still underutilised in health services research and can be particularly useful in the development and evaluation of interventions and the investigation of contexts and complexity.</p>","PeriodicalId":47653,"journal":{"name":"Gesundheitswesen","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gesundheitswesen","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2549-0493","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Qualitative evidence syntheses (QES) can answer qualitative research questions across different studies and thus offer an important part in the collection of evidence. While QES are a common set of methods internationally, they appear to be little used in health services research in the German-speaking countries to date.The aim of the study was to analyse the current use of QES in health services research in the German-speaking countries in order to draw conclusions for their establishment.An online survey was conducted by the subgroup Qualitative Evidence Syntheses in the German Network Health Services Research. The survey was aimed at health services researchers in German-speaking countries. Among other things, experiences with QES as well as barriers and support factors during implementation were surveyed. The data were analysed using descriptive statistics and content-structuring qualitative content analysis.A total of n=103 people took part in the survey, n=45 of whom had already been involved in QES. They had used QES to analyse the perspectives of target groups, to describe and evaluate health care, to (further) develop models and concepts and to implement and evaluate interventions. The participants referred to the high added value of QES, particularly due to its practical relevance, as well as to methodological difficulties in implementation and the desire for better training programmes.Qualitative evidence syntheses offer a potential that is still underutilised in health services research and can be particularly useful in the development and evaluation of interventions and the investigation of contexts and complexity.

定性证据综述(QES)可以回答不同研究中的定性研究问题,因此是证据收集的重要组成部分。虽然定性证据综述是一套国际通用的方法,但迄今为止在德语国家的医疗服务研究中似乎很少使用。这项研究的目的是分析德语国家医疗服务研究中目前使用定性证据综述的情况,从而为建立定性证据综述得出结论。该调查针对德语国家的医疗服务研究人员。调查内容包括 QES 的经验以及实施过程中的障碍和支持因素。共有 103 人参与了调查,其中 45 人已经参与过 QES。他们利用 QES 分析目标群体的观点,描述和评估医疗保健,(进一步)开发模型和概念,以及实施和评估干预措施。参与者提到了定性证据综述的高附加值,特别是由于它的实用性,以及实施方法上的困难和对更好的培训计划的渴望。定性证据综述提供了一种在医疗服务研究中仍未得到充分利用的潜力,在干预措施的开发和评估以及背景和复杂性的调查中特别有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gesundheitswesen
Gesundheitswesen PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
18.20%
发文量
308
期刊介绍: The health service informs you comprehensively and up-to-date about the most important topics of the health care system. In addition to guidelines, overviews and comments, you will find current research results and contributions to CME-certified continuing education and training. The journal offers a scientific discussion forum and a platform for communications from professional societies. The content quality is ensured by a publisher body, the expert advisory board and other experts in the peer review process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信