Shared Decision Making in Physical Therapist Care for People with Shoulder Problems: An Observer-Based Analysis of Audio-Recorded Consultations.

IF 3.5 4区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Sijmen Hacquebord, Henri Kiers, Philip van der Wees, Thomas J Hoogeboom
{"title":"Shared Decision Making in Physical Therapist Care for People with Shoulder Problems: An Observer-Based Analysis of Audio-Recorded Consultations.","authors":"Sijmen Hacquebord, Henri Kiers, Philip van der Wees, Thomas J Hoogeboom","doi":"10.1093/ptj/pzaf047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Despite the substantial diagnostic and therapeutic uncertainties in the decision-making process, it remains largely unclear to what extent shared decision making is applied in physical therapist care for people with shoulder problems. The purpose of our study was to determine to what extent shared decision making is part of the decision-making process in initial physical therapist consultations of people with shoulder problems, and to identify factors associated with the level of shared decision making.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, the level of shared decision making was measured by assessing audio-recorded initial physical therapist consultations of people with shoulder problems using the 5-item Observing Patient Involvement in Shared Decision Making tool (OPTION-5; 0-100, higher OPTION scores indicate higher level of shared decision making). Associations between the level of shared decision making and the characteristics of patients, physical therapists, and consultations were assessed using multilevel analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 100 initial physical therapist consultations of 41 participating physical therapists were included. The mean OPTION-5 score was 27 (range 5-70). On none of the individual items of the OPTION-5 the highest score \"exemplar effort\" was observed. The multilevel analysis showed that 3 determinants were associated with higher level of shared decision making: younger age of the patient (b = -1.8; 95% CI = -3.1 to -0.4), longer duration of the consultation (b = 5.5; 95% CI = 2.7 to 8.3), and higher level of education of the physical therapist (b = 9.1; 95% CI = 2.7 to 15.4).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The level of shared decision making in daily physical therapist practice for people with shoulder problems leaves room for improvement. Future research should focus on strategies to improve the application of shared decision making in physical therapist care for people with shoulder problems. The determinants duration of the consultation, and the level of education of the physical therapist, might provide guidance in developing these strategies for improving the application of shared decision making.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>The findings of this study give insight in the limited application of shared decision making in physical therapy for people with shoulder problems. Duration of the consultations and level of education of the physical therapist impact the level of shared decision making.</p>","PeriodicalId":20093,"journal":{"name":"Physical Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzaf047","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Despite the substantial diagnostic and therapeutic uncertainties in the decision-making process, it remains largely unclear to what extent shared decision making is applied in physical therapist care for people with shoulder problems. The purpose of our study was to determine to what extent shared decision making is part of the decision-making process in initial physical therapist consultations of people with shoulder problems, and to identify factors associated with the level of shared decision making.

Methods: In this cross-sectional study, the level of shared decision making was measured by assessing audio-recorded initial physical therapist consultations of people with shoulder problems using the 5-item Observing Patient Involvement in Shared Decision Making tool (OPTION-5; 0-100, higher OPTION scores indicate higher level of shared decision making). Associations between the level of shared decision making and the characteristics of patients, physical therapists, and consultations were assessed using multilevel analysis.

Results: A total of 100 initial physical therapist consultations of 41 participating physical therapists were included. The mean OPTION-5 score was 27 (range 5-70). On none of the individual items of the OPTION-5 the highest score "exemplar effort" was observed. The multilevel analysis showed that 3 determinants were associated with higher level of shared decision making: younger age of the patient (b = -1.8; 95% CI = -3.1 to -0.4), longer duration of the consultation (b = 5.5; 95% CI = 2.7 to 8.3), and higher level of education of the physical therapist (b = 9.1; 95% CI = 2.7 to 15.4).

Conclusions: The level of shared decision making in daily physical therapist practice for people with shoulder problems leaves room for improvement. Future research should focus on strategies to improve the application of shared decision making in physical therapist care for people with shoulder problems. The determinants duration of the consultation, and the level of education of the physical therapist, might provide guidance in developing these strategies for improving the application of shared decision making.

Impact: The findings of this study give insight in the limited application of shared decision making in physical therapy for people with shoulder problems. Duration of the consultations and level of education of the physical therapist impact the level of shared decision making.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physical Therapy
Physical Therapy Multiple-
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
187
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Physical Therapy (PTJ) engages and inspires an international readership on topics related to physical therapy. As the leading international journal for research in physical therapy and related fields, PTJ publishes innovative and highly relevant content for both clinicians and scientists and uses a variety of interactive approaches to communicate that content, with the expressed purpose of improving patient care. PTJ"s circulation in 2008 is more than 72,000. Its 2007 impact factor was 2.152. The mean time from submission to first decision is 58 days. Time from acceptance to publication online is less than or equal to 3 months and from acceptance to publication in print is less than or equal to 5 months.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信