Characteristics and prognosis in acute myocarditis and unexplained acute chest pain: a nationwide longitudinal cohort study.

IF 2.8 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Marie Björkenstam, Emanuele Bobbio, Christian L Polte, Clara Hjalmarsson, Niklas Bergh, Elmir Omerovic, Entela Bollano
{"title":"Characteristics and prognosis in acute myocarditis and unexplained acute chest pain: a nationwide longitudinal cohort study.","authors":"Marie Björkenstam, Emanuele Bobbio, Christian L Polte, Clara Hjalmarsson, Niklas Bergh, Elmir Omerovic, Entela Bollano","doi":"10.1136/openhrt-2024-003050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Acute myocarditis (AM) is a disease with variable prognosis, ranging from complete recovery to end-stage heart failure (HF) and death but often challenging to differentiate from unexplained acute chest pain (UCP) in the acute setting. This study examines the short-tem and long-term outcomes of AM compared with UCP, focusing on the risk of HF development.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used the Swedish Web System for Enhancement of Evidence-Based Care in Heart Disease Evaluated According to Recommended Therapies-registry to identify patients >16 years admitted to hospital between 1 January 1998 and 31 December 2018 with either AM or UCP. Patients were followed for outcomes including mortality, rehospitalisation and HF development over both short-term (30 days) and long-term periods. Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare the risks, adjusting for demographic and clinical-related factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 3792 patients with AM and 109 934 patients with UCP were included. Median follow-up time was 7.8 years (Q1, Q3; 3.4, 12.3). AM patients were younger compared with UCP patients, median age 37 years (Q1, Q3; 26, 52) vs 59 years (Q1, Q3; 49, 69) and more likely to be men (79.9% vs 51.4%, p<0.001). Comorbidity burden was less pronounced within the AM cohort. Chest pain was the most common presenting symptom in both groups. Mortality rate at 30 days (OR 3.75, 95% CI 1.9 to 7.3, p<0001) as well as long term (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.69 to 2.39, p<0.001) were significantly higher in AM patients compared with UCP. AM patients were more likely to develop HF during follow-up (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.81 to 2.93, p<0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AM is associated with worse short-term and long-term outcomes compared with UCP, including a higher risk of developing HF even after the first year.</p>","PeriodicalId":19505,"journal":{"name":"Open Heart","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11973765/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Heart","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2024-003050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Acute myocarditis (AM) is a disease with variable prognosis, ranging from complete recovery to end-stage heart failure (HF) and death but often challenging to differentiate from unexplained acute chest pain (UCP) in the acute setting. This study examines the short-tem and long-term outcomes of AM compared with UCP, focusing on the risk of HF development.

Methods: We used the Swedish Web System for Enhancement of Evidence-Based Care in Heart Disease Evaluated According to Recommended Therapies-registry to identify patients >16 years admitted to hospital between 1 January 1998 and 31 December 2018 with either AM or UCP. Patients were followed for outcomes including mortality, rehospitalisation and HF development over both short-term (30 days) and long-term periods. Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare the risks, adjusting for demographic and clinical-related factors.

Results: A total of 3792 patients with AM and 109 934 patients with UCP were included. Median follow-up time was 7.8 years (Q1, Q3; 3.4, 12.3). AM patients were younger compared with UCP patients, median age 37 years (Q1, Q3; 26, 52) vs 59 years (Q1, Q3; 49, 69) and more likely to be men (79.9% vs 51.4%, p<0.001). Comorbidity burden was less pronounced within the AM cohort. Chest pain was the most common presenting symptom in both groups. Mortality rate at 30 days (OR 3.75, 95% CI 1.9 to 7.3, p<0001) as well as long term (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.69 to 2.39, p<0.001) were significantly higher in AM patients compared with UCP. AM patients were more likely to develop HF during follow-up (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.81 to 2.93, p<0001).

Conclusions: AM is associated with worse short-term and long-term outcomes compared with UCP, including a higher risk of developing HF even after the first year.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Open Heart
Open Heart CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.70%
发文量
145
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Open Heart is an online-only, open access cardiology journal that aims to be “open” in many ways: open access (free access for all readers), open peer review (unblinded peer review) and open data (data sharing is encouraged). The goal is to ensure maximum transparency and maximum impact on research progress and patient care. The journal is dedicated to publishing high quality, peer reviewed medical research in all disciplines and therapeutic areas of cardiovascular medicine. Research is published across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Opinionated discussions on controversial topics are welcomed. Open Heart aims to operate a fast submission and review process with continuous publication online, to ensure timely, up-to-date research is available worldwide. The journal adheres to a rigorous and transparent peer review process, and all articles go through a statistical assessment to ensure robustness of the analyses. Open Heart is an official journal of the British Cardiovascular Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信