Impact of Centralization of Care for Patients With Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia in Sweden

IF 2.4 2区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Carmen Mesas Burgos , Vladimir Gatzinsky , Petra Nord , Elisabet Gustafson , Pernilla Stenström , Hans Winberg , Manja Nilsson , Lars Mikael Broman , Evelina Rosén , Tomas Wester
{"title":"Impact of Centralization of Care for Patients With Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia in Sweden","authors":"Carmen Mesas Burgos ,&nbsp;Vladimir Gatzinsky ,&nbsp;Petra Nord ,&nbsp;Elisabet Gustafson ,&nbsp;Pernilla Stenström ,&nbsp;Hans Winberg ,&nbsp;Manja Nilsson ,&nbsp;Lars Mikael Broman ,&nbsp;Evelina Rosén ,&nbsp;Tomas Wester","doi":"10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2025.162314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>There is very limited data regarding the impact of centralization of care of patients with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH). The National Board of Health and Welfare in Sweden decided to centralize the care of CDH from July 2018.</div><div>The aim of this study was to assess the short-term impact of centralization in patient outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This was a retrospective observational study including all centers in Sweden managing CDH before and after centralization. Outcomes for patients born with CDH who were managed from 1st of July 2013 to 30th of June 2018 (before centralization) were compared with patients managed 1st of July 2018 to 30th of June 2023 (after centralization). Fisher’s exact test and non-parametric tests were used to compare differences between the two time periods and a p &lt; 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The study was approved by the Swedish Ethical Review Authority (<strong>2023-02650-01).</strong></div></div><div><h3>Main results</h3><div>A total of 243 patients with CDH were managed nationally during the study period, 111 before and 132 after centralization. The rates of prenatal diagnosis, side of the defect, need of patch, or mortality did not differ significantly between the study periods. The need for ECMO decreased significantly after centralization 18 % vs. 7 %, p &lt; 0.01).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>After centralization, we observed a decreased rate of need for ECMO support. Although the time from centralization push through is short, it underscores the importance of an ongoing evaluation, optimization and strategic planning in order to find, describe and maximize the possible benefits of a centralization of CDH in our settings.</div></div><div><h3>Type of Study</h3><div>Retrospective cohort study, nationwide.</div></div><div><h3>Level of Evidence</h3><div>II.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16733,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pediatric surgery","volume":"60 6","pages":"Article 162314"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pediatric surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022346825001599","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

There is very limited data regarding the impact of centralization of care of patients with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH). The National Board of Health and Welfare in Sweden decided to centralize the care of CDH from July 2018.
The aim of this study was to assess the short-term impact of centralization in patient outcomes.

Methods

This was a retrospective observational study including all centers in Sweden managing CDH before and after centralization. Outcomes for patients born with CDH who were managed from 1st of July 2013 to 30th of June 2018 (before centralization) were compared with patients managed 1st of July 2018 to 30th of June 2023 (after centralization). Fisher’s exact test and non-parametric tests were used to compare differences between the two time periods and a p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The study was approved by the Swedish Ethical Review Authority (2023-02650-01).

Main results

A total of 243 patients with CDH were managed nationally during the study period, 111 before and 132 after centralization. The rates of prenatal diagnosis, side of the defect, need of patch, or mortality did not differ significantly between the study periods. The need for ECMO decreased significantly after centralization 18 % vs. 7 %, p < 0.01).

Conclusions

After centralization, we observed a decreased rate of need for ECMO support. Although the time from centralization push through is short, it underscores the importance of an ongoing evaluation, optimization and strategic planning in order to find, describe and maximize the possible benefits of a centralization of CDH in our settings.

Type of Study

Retrospective cohort study, nationwide.

Level of Evidence

II.
瑞典先天性膈疝患者集中护理的影响。
目的:关于先天性膈疝(CDH)患者集中护理的影响的数据非常有限。瑞典国家卫生和福利委员会决定从2018年7月起集中治疗CDH。本研究的目的是评估集中治疗对患者预后的短期影响。方法:这是一项回顾性观察性研究,包括瑞典所有中心化前后管理CDH的中心。将2013年7月1日至2018年6月30日(集中化前)治疗的先天性CDH患者的结果与2018年7月1日至2023年6月30日(集中化后)治疗的患者的结果进行比较。使用Fisher精确检验和非参数检验来比较两个时间段和一个时间段的差异。结论:集中化后,我们观察到ECMO支持的需求率下降。虽然从集中化推进的时间很短,但它强调了持续评估、优化和战略规划的重要性,以便发现、描述和最大限度地发挥CDH集中化在我们环境中的可能好处。研究类型:回顾性队列研究,全国性证据等级:II。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
569
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The journal presents original contributions as well as a complete international abstracts section and other special departments to provide the most current source of information and references in pediatric surgery. The journal is based on the need to improve the surgical care of infants and children, not only through advances in physiology, pathology and surgical techniques, but also by attention to the unique emotional and physical needs of the young patient.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信