Timing of pharmacological venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after firearm-related penetrating brain injury.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Jiaqi Liu, Tej D Azad, Foad Kazemi, Kathleen R Ran, Megan Parker, Vikas N Vattipally, Carlos Aguilera, Wuyang Yang, Caitlin W Hicks, Elliott R Haut, Christopher D Witiw, Morgan Schellenberg, Debraj Mukherjee, James P Byrne
{"title":"Timing of pharmacological venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after firearm-related penetrating brain injury.","authors":"Jiaqi Liu, Tej D Azad, Foad Kazemi, Kathleen R Ran, Megan Parker, Vikas N Vattipally, Carlos Aguilera, Wuyang Yang, Caitlin W Hicks, Elliott R Haut, Christopher D Witiw, Morgan Schellenberg, Debraj Mukherjee, James P Byrne","doi":"10.3171/2024.12.JNS242004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Mounting evidence supports early initiation of pharmacological venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis after traumatic brain injury. However, the effectiveness and safety of VTE prophylaxis after penetrating brain injury (PBI) is unclear. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of pharmacological VTE prophylaxis in patients with firearm-related PBI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study of patients aged ≥ 16 years with isolated firearm-related PBI treated at level I or II trauma centers participating in the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program (2017-2019). The exposure was the timing of VTE prophylaxis initiation measured in days from admission (prophylaxis delay). The primary outcome was VTE. Secondary outcomes were the need for late neurosurgical decompression (craniotomy/craniectomy after 48 hours) and in-hospital mortality. Hierarchical logistic regression estimated the association between prophylaxis delay and the outcomes after adjusting for patient baseline and injury characteristics. Effect modification was tested to determine if observed associations varied by type of early neurosurgical intervention: craniotomy/craniectomy, intracranial monitor/drain placement, or no intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The authors identified 2012 patients with isolated firearm-related PBI. The median presenting Glasgow Coma Scale score was 8 (IQR 3-14) and 31% had an abnormal pupillary response. Nearly half of the cohort received early neurosurgical intervention (craniotomy/craniectomy, 40%; intracranial monitor/drain, 8%). The median VTE prophylaxis delay was 3 days (IQR 2-5 days). VTE occurred in 6% of patients. Overall, late neurosurgical decompression was required in 9%, and 10% died. After risk adjustment, each additional day of prophylaxis delay was associated with 6% increased odds of VTE (OR 1.06 per day, 95% CI 1.02-1.11). However, the association between timing of prophylaxis and late neurosurgical decompression depended on type of early neurosurgical intervention. Specifically, each day of prophylaxis delay was associated with decreased odds of late decompression among patients who underwent intracranial monitor/drain only (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.35-0.75) or no intervention (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.75-0.95). Timing of prophylaxis was not associated with late neurosurgical decompression for patients who underwent early craniotomy/craniectomy. There was no association with in-hospital mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among patients with firearm-related PBI, earlier pharmacological prophylaxis was associated with decreased odds of VTE. However, earlier prophylaxis was also associated with late neurosurgical decompression among patients who underwent intracranial monitor/drain placement or no intervention, an effect not observed for patients who underwent early craniotomy/craniectomy. These findings suggest that while early prophylaxis should be prioritized, prospective study is needed to clarify safe timing of initiation in different patient groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":16505,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.12.JNS242004","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Mounting evidence supports early initiation of pharmacological venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis after traumatic brain injury. However, the effectiveness and safety of VTE prophylaxis after penetrating brain injury (PBI) is unclear. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of pharmacological VTE prophylaxis in patients with firearm-related PBI.

Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients aged ≥ 16 years with isolated firearm-related PBI treated at level I or II trauma centers participating in the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program (2017-2019). The exposure was the timing of VTE prophylaxis initiation measured in days from admission (prophylaxis delay). The primary outcome was VTE. Secondary outcomes were the need for late neurosurgical decompression (craniotomy/craniectomy after 48 hours) and in-hospital mortality. Hierarchical logistic regression estimated the association between prophylaxis delay and the outcomes after adjusting for patient baseline and injury characteristics. Effect modification was tested to determine if observed associations varied by type of early neurosurgical intervention: craniotomy/craniectomy, intracranial monitor/drain placement, or no intervention.

Results: The authors identified 2012 patients with isolated firearm-related PBI. The median presenting Glasgow Coma Scale score was 8 (IQR 3-14) and 31% had an abnormal pupillary response. Nearly half of the cohort received early neurosurgical intervention (craniotomy/craniectomy, 40%; intracranial monitor/drain, 8%). The median VTE prophylaxis delay was 3 days (IQR 2-5 days). VTE occurred in 6% of patients. Overall, late neurosurgical decompression was required in 9%, and 10% died. After risk adjustment, each additional day of prophylaxis delay was associated with 6% increased odds of VTE (OR 1.06 per day, 95% CI 1.02-1.11). However, the association between timing of prophylaxis and late neurosurgical decompression depended on type of early neurosurgical intervention. Specifically, each day of prophylaxis delay was associated with decreased odds of late decompression among patients who underwent intracranial monitor/drain only (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.35-0.75) or no intervention (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.75-0.95). Timing of prophylaxis was not associated with late neurosurgical decompression for patients who underwent early craniotomy/craniectomy. There was no association with in-hospital mortality.

Conclusions: Among patients with firearm-related PBI, earlier pharmacological prophylaxis was associated with decreased odds of VTE. However, earlier prophylaxis was also associated with late neurosurgical decompression among patients who underwent intracranial monitor/drain placement or no intervention, an effect not observed for patients who underwent early craniotomy/craniectomy. These findings suggest that while early prophylaxis should be prioritized, prospective study is needed to clarify safe timing of initiation in different patient groups.

火器性穿透性脑损伤后静脉血栓栓塞药物预防的时机。
目的:越来越多的证据支持创伤性脑损伤后早期开始静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)药物预防。然而,穿透性脑损伤(PBI)后静脉血栓栓塞预防的有效性和安全性尚不清楚。本研究的目的是评估枪支相关PBI患者静脉血栓栓塞药物预防的有效性和安全性。方法:这是一项回顾性队列研究,年龄≥16岁,在美国外科医师学会创伤质量改善计划(2017-2019)的一级或二级创伤中心治疗的孤立性火器相关PBI患者。暴露是静脉血栓栓塞预防开始的时间,以入院后的天数计算(预防延迟)。主要终点为静脉血栓栓塞。次要结局是需要进行晚期神经外科减压(48小时后开颅/开颅)和住院死亡率。在调整患者基线和损伤特征后,分层逻辑回归估计了预防延迟与结果之间的关系。对效应修正进行了测试,以确定观察到的相关性是否因早期神经外科干预的类型而异:开颅术/开颅术,颅内监护仪/引流管放置,或不干预。结果:作者确定了2012例孤立性枪支相关PBI患者。格拉斯哥昏迷评分中位数为8分(IQR 3-14), 31%瞳孔反应异常。近一半的队列接受了早期神经外科干预(开颅术/开颅术,40%;颅内监护/引流,8%)。静脉血栓栓塞预防延迟的中位数为3天(IQR为2-5天)。静脉血栓栓塞发生率为6%。总体而言,9%的患者需要进行晚期神经外科减压,10%的患者死亡。风险调整后,预防延迟每增加一天,静脉血栓栓塞的几率增加6% (OR 1.06 /天,95% CI 1.02-1.11)。然而,预防时间和晚期神经外科减压之间的关系取决于早期神经外科干预的类型。具体而言,预防延迟的每一天与仅接受颅内监测/引流的患者(OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.35-0.75)或不进行干预的患者(OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.75-0.95)晚期减压的几率降低相关。对于接受早期开颅术/开颅术的患者,预防的时机与晚期神经外科减压无关。与住院死亡率没有关联。结论:在枪支相关PBI患者中,早期药物预防与静脉血栓栓塞发生率降低相关。然而,在接受颅内监护/引流管放置或未进行干预的患者中,早期预防也与晚期神经外科减压相关,而在早期开颅/开颅患者中未观察到这种效果。这些发现表明,虽然早期预防应优先考虑,但需要前瞻性研究来明确不同患者群体的安全起始时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgery
Journal of neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
7.30%
发文量
1003
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics, and Neurosurgical Focus are devoted to the publication of original works relating primarily to neurosurgery, including studies in clinical neurophysiology, organic neurology, ophthalmology, radiology, pathology, and molecular biology. The Editors and Editorial Boards encourage submission of clinical and laboratory studies. Other manuscripts accepted for review include technical notes on instruments or equipment that are innovative or useful to clinicians and researchers in the field of neuroscience; papers describing unusual cases; manuscripts on historical persons or events related to neurosurgery; and in Neurosurgical Focus, occasional reviews. Letters to the Editor commenting on articles recently published in the Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, and Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信