The optimal number of lymph node dissections in three-field lymphadenectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a large retrospective study.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Huaiyuan Zhang, Jun-Peng Lin, Xiao-Feng Chen, Feng Wang
{"title":"The optimal number of lymph node dissections in three-field lymphadenectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a large retrospective study.","authors":"Huaiyuan Zhang, Jun-Peng Lin, Xiao-Feng Chen, Feng Wang","doi":"10.1007/s00423-025-03686-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Currently, there is no consensus on the optimal number of lymph node dissections (LNDs) in three-field lymphadenectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). This study aimed to explore the relationship between the LND count and overall survival (OS) in ESCC patients to determine the optimal number of LNDs that confer a survival benefit.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on ESCC patients who underwent three-field lymphadenectomy at Fujian Cancer Hospital from February 2004 to January 2018. The optimal LND number was determined using X-Tile software. Kaplan‒Meier survival curves and Cox regression analyses were used to evaluate the relationship between LND count and OS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1053 ESCC patients who underwent three-field lymphadenectomy were included in this study (median age 58 years [IQR: 52-65], 781 males [74.2%]). Using X-Tile software, 27 was identified as the optimal cutoff value for the number of LNDs. The 5-year OS for the > 27 LNDs group was significantly better than that for the ≤ 27 LNDs group (67.8% vs. 59.8%, P = 0.042). Multivariate Cox regression analysis confirmed that LND count (≤ 27 and > 27) was an independent protective factor for OS (HR = 0.724; P = 0.004). Stratified analysis on the basis of TNM stage revealed that in patients with T3-4N0M0 disease (HR = 0.412; P = 0.001) and T1-2 N + M0 disease (HR = 0.503; P = 0.025), a greater number of dissected lymph nodes was closely associated with a survival benefit.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For ESCC patients undergoing three-field lymphadenectomy, dissecting more than 27 lymph nodes is associated with better prognosis, especially for patients with T3-4N0M0 and T1-2 N + M0 stages.</p>","PeriodicalId":17983,"journal":{"name":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","volume":"410 1","pages":"121"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11972225/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-025-03686-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Currently, there is no consensus on the optimal number of lymph node dissections (LNDs) in three-field lymphadenectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). This study aimed to explore the relationship between the LND count and overall survival (OS) in ESCC patients to determine the optimal number of LNDs that confer a survival benefit.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on ESCC patients who underwent three-field lymphadenectomy at Fujian Cancer Hospital from February 2004 to January 2018. The optimal LND number was determined using X-Tile software. Kaplan‒Meier survival curves and Cox regression analyses were used to evaluate the relationship between LND count and OS.

Results: A total of 1053 ESCC patients who underwent three-field lymphadenectomy were included in this study (median age 58 years [IQR: 52-65], 781 males [74.2%]). Using X-Tile software, 27 was identified as the optimal cutoff value for the number of LNDs. The 5-year OS for the > 27 LNDs group was significantly better than that for the ≤ 27 LNDs group (67.8% vs. 59.8%, P = 0.042). Multivariate Cox regression analysis confirmed that LND count (≤ 27 and > 27) was an independent protective factor for OS (HR = 0.724; P = 0.004). Stratified analysis on the basis of TNM stage revealed that in patients with T3-4N0M0 disease (HR = 0.412; P = 0.001) and T1-2 N + M0 disease (HR = 0.503; P = 0.025), a greater number of dissected lymph nodes was closely associated with a survival benefit.

Conclusion: For ESCC patients undergoing three-field lymphadenectomy, dissecting more than 27 lymph nodes is associated with better prognosis, especially for patients with T3-4N0M0 and T1-2 N + M0 stages.

食管鳞状细胞癌三野淋巴结切除术中淋巴结清扫的最佳数量:一项大型回顾性研究。
背景:目前,对于食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)三野淋巴结切除术中淋巴结清扫(LNDs)的最佳数量尚未达成共识。本研究旨在探讨ESCC患者LND计数与总生存期(OS)之间的关系,以确定可带来生存益处的LND的最佳数量。方法:回顾性分析2004年2月至2018年1月福建省肿瘤医院行三野淋巴结切除术的ESCC患者。利用X-Tile软件确定最佳LND数。采用Kaplan-Meier生存曲线和Cox回归分析评价LND计数与OS的关系。结果:本研究共纳入1053例行三野淋巴结切除术的ESCC患者(中位年龄58岁[IQR: 52-65],男性781例[74.2%])。使用X-Tile软件,27被确定为ld数量的最佳截止值。LNDs≤27的组5年OS明显优于LNDs≤27的组(67.8% vs. 59.8%, P = 0.042)。多因素Cox回归分析证实LND计数(≤27和> 27)是OS的独立保护因素(HR = 0.724;p = 0.004)。基于TNM分期的分层分析显示,T3-4N0M0患者(HR = 0.412;P = 0.001)和T1-2 N + M0疾病(HR = 0.503;P = 0.025),更多的淋巴结清扫与生存获益密切相关。结论:对于行三野淋巴结切除术的ESCC患者,清扫27个以上淋巴结预后较好,尤其是T3-4N0M0期和T1-2 N + M0期患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
8.70%
发文量
342
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Langenbeck''s Archives of Surgery aims to publish the best results in the field of clinical surgery and basic surgical research. The main focus is on providing the highest level of clinical research and clinically relevant basic research. The journal, published exclusively in English, will provide an international discussion forum for the controlled results of clinical surgery. The majority of published contributions will be original articles reporting on clinical data from general and visceral surgery, while endocrine surgery will also be covered. Papers on basic surgical principles from the fields of traumatology, vascular and thoracic surgery are also welcome. Evidence-based medicine is an important criterion for the acceptance of papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信