Towards improved prescription metrics in novel radiotherapy techniques: a machine learning study.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Alfredo Fernandez-Rodriguez, Yolanda Prezado
{"title":"Towards improved prescription metrics in novel radiotherapy techniques: a machine learning study.","authors":"Alfredo Fernandez-Rodriguez, Yolanda Prezado","doi":"10.1088/1361-6560/adc96c","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objective.</i>FLASH radiotherapy (RT), microbeam RT (MRT) and minibeam RT (MBRT) are novel RT techniques that have been shown to reduce normal tissue complication probabilities, by modulating the dose distributions through different parameters in space and time. This study aims to investigate the importance of these parameters for predicting biological outcomes using a machine learning (ML) approach and to compare the findings with previous correlation analyses in the context of the current understanding of these techniques.<i>Approach.</i>A ML algorithm was trained for predicting normal tissue toxicity, tumor control and increased lifespan (ILS) quantitative metrics on published datasets of preclinical MRT, MBRT and FLASH RT data. The influence of different variables on the performance of the model over unseen data was quantified, and their importance on its predictive power was ranked.<i>Main results.</i>An accuracy of 70% or superior was achieved for the prediction of most metrics, reduced for normal tissue toxicity to 60% in MBRT and 40% in FLASH RT. In MRT, valley dose was found as the most influencing physical parameter for normal tissue sparing, while in MBRT the peak dose was highlighted as one of the most influential parameters. Valley dose showed the greatest impact over ILS in a conjoint study of both techniques. In FLASH RT, the total dose, along with the tissue characteristics, were identified as the most influencing variables for tumor control and normal tissue toxicity. The importance of dose rate increased when considering therapeutic index.<i>Significance.</i>These results agree with previous studies that highlight how dose heterogeneity prevents normal tissue damage in MBRT and MRT and the need of prescribing under critical tissue specific valley and peak dose values respectively for optimal sparing and tumor control. The described findings are also consistent with FLASH RT tumor control being driven by the same mechanisms as in conventional RT.</p>","PeriodicalId":20185,"journal":{"name":"Physics in medicine and biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics in medicine and biology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/adc96c","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective.FLASH radiotherapy (RT), microbeam RT (MRT) and minibeam RT (MBRT) are novel RT techniques that have been shown to reduce normal tissue complication probabilities, by modulating the dose distributions through different parameters in space and time. This study aims to investigate the importance of these parameters for predicting biological outcomes using a machine learning (ML) approach and to compare the findings with previous correlation analyses in the context of the current understanding of these techniques.Approach.A ML algorithm was trained for predicting normal tissue toxicity, tumor control and increased lifespan (ILS) quantitative metrics on published datasets of preclinical MRT, MBRT and FLASH RT data. The influence of different variables on the performance of the model over unseen data was quantified, and their importance on its predictive power was ranked.Main results.An accuracy of 70% or superior was achieved for the prediction of most metrics, reduced for normal tissue toxicity to 60% in MBRT and 40% in FLASH RT. In MRT, valley dose was found as the most influencing physical parameter for normal tissue sparing, while in MBRT the peak dose was highlighted as one of the most influential parameters. Valley dose showed the greatest impact over ILS in a conjoint study of both techniques. In FLASH RT, the total dose, along with the tissue characteristics, were identified as the most influencing variables for tumor control and normal tissue toxicity. The importance of dose rate increased when considering therapeutic index.Significance.These results agree with previous studies that highlight how dose heterogeneity prevents normal tissue damage in MBRT and MRT and the need of prescribing under critical tissue specific valley and peak dose values respectively for optimal sparing and tumor control. The described findings are also consistent with FLASH RT tumor control being driven by the same mechanisms as in conventional RT.

改进新型放疗技术的处方指标:一项机器学习研究。
目的: ;FLASH放疗、微束放疗(MRT)和微束放疗(MBRT)是新型放疗(RT)技术,通过不同的空间和时间参数调节剂量分布,降低正常组织并发症的概率。本研究旨在探讨这些参数对于使用机器学习方法预测生物学结果的重要性,并在当前对这些技术的理解背景下,将研究结果与之前的相关分析进行比较。 ;在临床前MRT、MBRT和FLASH RT数据的公开数据集上,训练机器学习算法来预测正常组织毒性、肿瘤控制和延长寿命(ILS)评分。对不同变量对模型在未见数据上的性能的影响进行了量化,并对其预测能力的重要性进行了排序。 ;主要结果 ;大多数评分者的预测准确率达到70%或更高,MBRT的正常组织毒性降低到60%,FLASH rt降低到40%。在MRT中,发现valley剂量是影响正常组织保留的最重要的物理参数。而在MBRT中,峰值剂量被强调为最具影响力的参数之一。在两种技术的联合研究中,谷剂量对ILS的影响最大。在FLASH RT中,总剂量和组织特性被确定为影响肿瘤控制和正常组织毒性的最重要变量。在考虑治疗指标时,剂量率的重要性提高。& # xD;意义。这些结果与先前的研究一致,强调了剂量异质性如何防止MBRT和MRT中的正常组织损伤,以及需要分别在临界组织特异性谷和峰剂量值下处方,以获得最佳保留和肿瘤控制。所描述的结果也与FLASH RT肿瘤控制由与传统RT相同的机制驱动一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physics in medicine and biology
Physics in medicine and biology 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
409
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The development and application of theoretical, computational and experimental physics to medicine, physiology and biology. Topics covered are: therapy physics (including ionizing and non-ionizing radiation); biomedical imaging (e.g. x-ray, magnetic resonance, ultrasound, optical and nuclear imaging); image-guided interventions; image reconstruction and analysis (including kinetic modelling); artificial intelligence in biomedical physics and analysis; nanoparticles in imaging and therapy; radiobiology; radiation protection and patient dose monitoring; radiation dosimetry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信