China's approach to malaria control and elimination: Adaptive management and policy capacity building.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Global Public Health Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-04 DOI:10.1080/17441692.2025.2484627
Wei Ding, Duoquan Wang, Shenning Lu, Xiao-Nong Zhou, Lewis Husain
{"title":"China's approach to malaria control and elimination: Adaptive management and policy capacity building.","authors":"Wei Ding, Duoquan Wang, Shenning Lu, Xiao-Nong Zhou, Lewis Husain","doi":"10.1080/17441692.2025.2484627","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>ABSTRACT</b>Malaria remains a major global public health burden and is a potential priority for Chinese health cooperation. However, limited analysis exists on the reference value of China's malaria elimination experience for other countries. While existing studies have focused on specific control strategies used in China, few have examined how Chinese malaria policy and practice have been adapted over time in response to heterogeneity across a vast country. This paper draws on literature, policy reviews, and in-depth interviews with key informants, including government officials and experts involved in malaria policy or implementation. It analyses the evolution of Chinese malaria policy from the 1950s to 2020 and presents case studies profiling specific practices through the lenses of policy experimentation and 'policy capacity'. The findings highlight how adaptive malaria policy and practice in China responded not only to the changing distribution and burden of malaria but also to shifts in institutions and the political economy as the country developed. Experimentation facilitated adaptive, sequential problem-solving, starting from a low base with limited data availability and capacity. China's experience offered valuable insights for other countries and for the evolution of its health cooperation initiatives.</p>","PeriodicalId":12735,"journal":{"name":"Global Public Health","volume":"20 1","pages":"2484627"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2025.2484627","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTMalaria remains a major global public health burden and is a potential priority for Chinese health cooperation. However, limited analysis exists on the reference value of China's malaria elimination experience for other countries. While existing studies have focused on specific control strategies used in China, few have examined how Chinese malaria policy and practice have been adapted over time in response to heterogeneity across a vast country. This paper draws on literature, policy reviews, and in-depth interviews with key informants, including government officials and experts involved in malaria policy or implementation. It analyses the evolution of Chinese malaria policy from the 1950s to 2020 and presents case studies profiling specific practices through the lenses of policy experimentation and 'policy capacity'. The findings highlight how adaptive malaria policy and practice in China responded not only to the changing distribution and burden of malaria but also to shifts in institutions and the political economy as the country developed. Experimentation facilitated adaptive, sequential problem-solving, starting from a low base with limited data availability and capacity. China's experience offered valuable insights for other countries and for the evolution of its health cooperation initiatives.

中国控制和消除疟疾的方法:适应性管理和政策能力建设。
疟疾仍然是全球主要的公共卫生负担,也是中国卫生合作的潜在重点。然而,中国消除疟疾经验对其他国家的参考价值分析有限。虽然现有的研究主要集中在中国使用的具体控制策略上,但很少有人研究中国的疟疾政策和实践是如何随着时间的推移而适应这个庞大国家的异质性的。本文借鉴了文献、政策综述和对关键线人的深度访谈,包括参与疟疾政策或实施的政府官员和专家。它分析了从20世纪50年代到2020年中国疟疾政策的演变,并通过政策实验和“政策能力”的视角提出了分析具体实践的案例研究。这些发现突出表明,中国的适应性疟疾政策和实践不仅应对了疟疾分布和负担的变化,而且还应对了随着国家发展而发生的制度和政治经济变化。实验有助于从数据可用性和容量有限的低基数开始进行适应性的、顺序的问题解决。中国的经验为其他国家及其卫生合作倡议的演变提供了宝贵的借鉴。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Public Health
Global Public Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
3.00%
发文量
120
期刊介绍: Global Public Health is an essential peer-reviewed journal that energetically engages with key public health issues that have come to the fore in the global environment — mounting inequalities between rich and poor; the globalization of trade; new patterns of travel and migration; epidemics of newly-emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases; the HIV/AIDS pandemic; the increase in chronic illnesses; escalating pressure on public health infrastructures around the world; and the growing range and scale of conflict situations, terrorist threats, environmental pressures, natural and human-made disasters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信