SPECT/CT in addition to subtraction parathyroid scintigraphy in hyperparathyroidism: diagnostic performance in a cohort of predominantly end-stage renal disease patients.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Worachart Jitrapinate, Yutapong Raruenrom, Nantaporn Wongsurawat, Prakasit Sa-Ngiamwibool, Daris Theerakulpisut
{"title":"SPECT/CT in addition to subtraction parathyroid scintigraphy in hyperparathyroidism: diagnostic performance in a cohort of predominantly end-stage renal disease patients.","authors":"Worachart Jitrapinate, Yutapong Raruenrom, Nantaporn Wongsurawat, Prakasit Sa-Ngiamwibool, Daris Theerakulpisut","doi":"10.1186/s13550-025-01234-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>SPECT/CT has been well established as a valuable technique in nuclear medicine parathyroid imaging, but most previous studies were done in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. In this retrospective study, we examined the diagnostic performance of [<sup>99m</sup>Tc]NaTcO4 / [<sup>99m</sup>Tc]Tc-MIBI planar subtraction parathyroid scintigraphy (PS), SPECT/CT, and a combination of the two in a patient cohort consisting of mostly end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients with secondary or tertiary hyperparathyroidism, using histopathological results as the reference standard.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 116 patients included, 98 (84.5%) had ESRD. The overall sensitivity of subtraction PS, SPECT/CT and combined interpretation was 69% (95% confidence interval: 64-73%), 67% (61-72%), and 79% (74-84%), while the specificity was 68% (59-76%), 71% (61-80%), and 60% (50-70%), respectively. For patients without ESRD with predominantly primary hyperparathyroidism, the sensitivity was 93% (70-99%), 89% (57-98%), and 100% (70-100%), and the specificity was 88% (76-94%), 87% (71-95%), and 84% (67-93%), respectively. For those with ESRD with predominantly tertiary and secondary hyperparathyroidism, the sensitivity was 67% (62-72%), 66% (60-71%), 78% (73-83%), and the specificity was 55% (42-67%), 57% (43-70%), and 43% (30-58%), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SPECT/CT was not superior to subtraction PS in ESRD patients with hyperparathyroidism. Combining these two techniques improves sensitivity, but likely with the expense of reduction in specificity. Both planar subtraction PS and SPECT/CT have suboptimal diagnostic performance in ESRD patients compared with non-ESRD patients where these techniques provide impressive sensitivity and specificity.</p>","PeriodicalId":11611,"journal":{"name":"EJNMMI Research","volume":"15 1","pages":"34"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11972272/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EJNMMI Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13550-025-01234-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: SPECT/CT has been well established as a valuable technique in nuclear medicine parathyroid imaging, but most previous studies were done in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. In this retrospective study, we examined the diagnostic performance of [99mTc]NaTcO4 / [99mTc]Tc-MIBI planar subtraction parathyroid scintigraphy (PS), SPECT/CT, and a combination of the two in a patient cohort consisting of mostly end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients with secondary or tertiary hyperparathyroidism, using histopathological results as the reference standard.

Results: Among 116 patients included, 98 (84.5%) had ESRD. The overall sensitivity of subtraction PS, SPECT/CT and combined interpretation was 69% (95% confidence interval: 64-73%), 67% (61-72%), and 79% (74-84%), while the specificity was 68% (59-76%), 71% (61-80%), and 60% (50-70%), respectively. For patients without ESRD with predominantly primary hyperparathyroidism, the sensitivity was 93% (70-99%), 89% (57-98%), and 100% (70-100%), and the specificity was 88% (76-94%), 87% (71-95%), and 84% (67-93%), respectively. For those with ESRD with predominantly tertiary and secondary hyperparathyroidism, the sensitivity was 67% (62-72%), 66% (60-71%), 78% (73-83%), and the specificity was 55% (42-67%), 57% (43-70%), and 43% (30-58%), respectively.

Conclusion: SPECT/CT was not superior to subtraction PS in ESRD patients with hyperparathyroidism. Combining these two techniques improves sensitivity, but likely with the expense of reduction in specificity. Both planar subtraction PS and SPECT/CT have suboptimal diagnostic performance in ESRD patients compared with non-ESRD patients where these techniques provide impressive sensitivity and specificity.

SPECT/CT加减影甲状旁腺显像对甲状旁腺功能亢进的诊断作用:主要是终末期肾病患者的队列
背景:SPECT/CT已被公认为核医学甲状旁腺成像的一种有价值的技术,但大多数先前的研究都是在原发性甲状旁腺功能亢进患者中进行的。在这项回顾性研究中,我们检查了[99mTc]NaTcO4 / [99mTc]Tc-MIBI平面减影甲状旁腺显像(PS)、SPECT/CT以及两者结合在一个主要由终末期肾病(ESRD)继发性或三期甲状旁腺功能异常患者组成的患者队列中的诊断性能,并以组织病理学结果作为参考标准。结果:116例患者中,98例(84.5%)发生ESRD。减影PS、SPECT/CT和联合解释的总体敏感性分别为69%(95%置信区间:64-73%)、67%(61-72%)和79%(74-84%),特异性分别为68%(59-76%)、71%(61-80%)和60%(50-70%)。对于无ESRD且以原发性甲状旁腺功能亢进为主的患者,敏感性分别为93%(70-99%)、89%(57-98%)和100%(70-100%),特异性分别为88%(76-94%)、87%(71-95%)和84%(67-93%)。对于以三期和继发性甲状旁腺功能亢进为主的ESRD患者,敏感性分别为67%(62-72%)、66%(60-71%)、78%(73-83%),特异性分别为55%(42-67%)、57%(43-70%)和43%(30-58%)。结论:SPECT/CT对ESRD合并甲状旁腺功能亢进患者的诊断效果并不优于减影PS。结合这两种技术可以提高灵敏度,但可能以降低特异性为代价。与非ESRD患者相比,平面减影PS和SPECT/CT在ESRD患者中的诊断效果都不理想,而这些技术提供了令人印象深刻的敏感性和特异性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
EJNMMI Research
EJNMMI Research RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING&nb-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.10%
发文量
72
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: EJNMMI Research publishes new basic, translational and clinical research in the field of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging. Regular features include original research articles, rapid communication of preliminary data on innovative research, interesting case reports, editorials, and letters to the editor. Educational articles on basic sciences, fundamental aspects and controversy related to pre-clinical and clinical research or ethical aspects of research are also welcome. Timely reviews provide updates on current applications, issues in imaging research and translational aspects of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging technologies. The main emphasis is placed on the development of targeted imaging with radiopharmaceuticals within the broader context of molecular probes to enhance understanding and characterisation of the complex biological processes underlying disease and to develop, test and guide new treatment modalities, including radionuclide therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信