Advancing the Management of CH, MDS, and AML From the First Bridging the Gaps in Leukemia, Lymphoma, and Multiple Myeloma Conference.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Hetty E Carraway, Andrew M Brunner, Catherine E Lai, Marlise R Luskin, Jae Park, Alexander E Perl, Eytan M Stein, Eunice S Wang, Amer M Zeidan, Joshua F Zeidner, Rami Komrokji
{"title":"Advancing the Management of CH, MDS, and AML From the First Bridging the Gaps in Leukemia, Lymphoma, and Multiple Myeloma Conference.","authors":"Hetty E Carraway, Andrew M Brunner, Catherine E Lai, Marlise R Luskin, Jae Park, Alexander E Perl, Eytan M Stein, Eunice S Wang, Amer M Zeidan, Joshua F Zeidner, Rami Komrokji","doi":"10.1016/j.clml.2025.03.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The management of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) have evolved substantially in recent years with the development of targeted therapies and novel nontargeted approaches. However, many questions remain about how to best use current therapies, and there is a large unmet need for effective therapies, particularly for patients with higher-risk MDS, AML, and those with MDS/AML relapsed/refractory (R/R) to prior therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>A panel of experts was assembled to discuss current controversies and unanswered questions in the care of patients with MDS and AML. Workshop topics included: molecular testing and new classification systems, clonal hematopoiesis, treatment of MDS (lower-risk and higher-risk), frontline treatment of AML, treatment of special populations, treatment of R/R AML, and novel approaches.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We identified many areas of ongoing controversy in the diagnosis and management of MDS and AML related to classification and risk assessment, treatment selection, sequencing of therapies, and monitoring of responses. Many clinical trials are ongoing to further improve outcomes for patients with MDS and AML, and we noted potential areas of debate related to study design, selection of endpoints, and assessment of responses. The controversies and gaps in knowledge identified by this panel will inform a follow-up conference in 2025 that will employ a modified Delphi method with a goal of developing and publishing formal consensus recommendations that can provide actionable guidance to clinicians in practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":10348,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clml.2025.03.005","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The management of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) have evolved substantially in recent years with the development of targeted therapies and novel nontargeted approaches. However, many questions remain about how to best use current therapies, and there is a large unmet need for effective therapies, particularly for patients with higher-risk MDS, AML, and those with MDS/AML relapsed/refractory (R/R) to prior therapy.

Methods and results: A panel of experts was assembled to discuss current controversies and unanswered questions in the care of patients with MDS and AML. Workshop topics included: molecular testing and new classification systems, clonal hematopoiesis, treatment of MDS (lower-risk and higher-risk), frontline treatment of AML, treatment of special populations, treatment of R/R AML, and novel approaches.

Conclusions: We identified many areas of ongoing controversy in the diagnosis and management of MDS and AML related to classification and risk assessment, treatment selection, sequencing of therapies, and monitoring of responses. Many clinical trials are ongoing to further improve outcomes for patients with MDS and AML, and we noted potential areas of debate related to study design, selection of endpoints, and assessment of responses. The controversies and gaps in knowledge identified by this panel will inform a follow-up conference in 2025 that will employ a modified Delphi method with a goal of developing and publishing formal consensus recommendations that can provide actionable guidance to clinicians in practice.

从第一届缩小白血病、淋巴瘤和多发性骨髓瘤的差距会议开始,推进对 CH、MDS 和 AML 的管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
1606
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia is a peer-reviewed monthly journal that publishes original articles describing various aspects of clinical and translational research of lymphoma, myeloma and leukemia. Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of lymphoma, myeloma, leukemia and related disorders including macroglobulinemia, amyloidosis, and plasma-cell dyscrasias. The main emphasis is on recent scientific developments in all areas related to lymphoma, myeloma and leukemia. Specific areas of interest include clinical research and mechanistic approaches; drug sensitivity and resistance; gene and antisense therapy; pathology, markers, and prognostic indicators; chemoprevention strategies; multimodality therapy; and integration of various approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信