Beyond proximity: an observational study of stillbirth rates and emergency obstetric and newborn care accessibility in The Gambia.

IF 7.1 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Oghenebrume Wariri, Winfred Dotse-Gborgbortsi, Schadrac C Agbla, Hawanatu Jah, Mamady Cham, Ba Foday Jawara, Mustapha Bittaye, Momodou T Nyassi, Musa Marena, Sainey Sanneh, Mariama Janneh, Beate Kampmann, Aduragbemi Banke-Thomas, Joy E Lawn, Uduak Okomo
{"title":"Beyond proximity: an observational study of stillbirth rates and emergency obstetric and newborn care accessibility in The Gambia.","authors":"Oghenebrume Wariri, Winfred Dotse-Gborgbortsi, Schadrac C Agbla, Hawanatu Jah, Mamady Cham, Ba Foday Jawara, Mustapha Bittaye, Momodou T Nyassi, Musa Marena, Sainey Sanneh, Mariama Janneh, Beate Kampmann, Aduragbemi Banke-Thomas, Joy E Lawn, Uduak Okomo","doi":"10.1136/bmjgh-2024-016579","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Stillbirths are disproportionately concentrated in sub-Saharan Africa, where geographical accessibility to basic/comprehensive emergency obstetric and newborn care (BEmONC and CEmONC) significantly influences maternal and perinatal outcomes. This study describes stillbirth rates within healthcare facilities in The Gambia and examines their distribution in relation to the geographical accessibility of these facilities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analysed 97 276 births recorded between 1 January 2013 and 31 December 2018, from 10 major public healthcare facilities in The Gambia. To standardise definitions, stillbirths were defined as fetal deaths with a birth weight of ≥500 g. Fresh stillbirths were reclassified as intrapartum, and macerated stillbirths were reclassified as antepartum. Linear regression with cubic splines was used to model trends, and AccessMod software estimated travel times to facilities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among recorded births, 5.1% (4873) were stillbirths, with an overall stillbirth rate of 51.3 per 1000 births (95% CI: 27.5 to 93.6). Intrapartum stillbirths accounted for 53.8% (27.6 per 1000 births; 95% CI: 14.4 to 49.8). Fully functional CEmONC facilities reported the highest stillbirth rates, including the National Teaching Hospital (101.7 per 1000 births, 95% CI: 96.8 to 106.8). Approximately 42.8%, 58.9% and 68.3% of women aged 15-49 lived within a 10, 20 and 30 min travel time, respectively, to fully functional CEmONC facilities, where high stillbirth rates were concentrated.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In The Gambia, intrapartum stillbirth rates remain alarmingly high, even in geographically accessible CEmONC facilities. Inadequate documentation of fetal heart rate on admission hampers accurate classification, complicating targeted interventions. Ensuring that EmONC-designated facilities-particularly those providing BEmONC services-are fully functional with essential equipment, trained staff and robust referral systems, while enhancing the timeliness and quality of obstetric care, is crucial to reducing stillbirth rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":9137,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Global Health","volume":"10 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11969588/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2024-016579","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Stillbirths are disproportionately concentrated in sub-Saharan Africa, where geographical accessibility to basic/comprehensive emergency obstetric and newborn care (BEmONC and CEmONC) significantly influences maternal and perinatal outcomes. This study describes stillbirth rates within healthcare facilities in The Gambia and examines their distribution in relation to the geographical accessibility of these facilities.

Methods: We analysed 97 276 births recorded between 1 January 2013 and 31 December 2018, from 10 major public healthcare facilities in The Gambia. To standardise definitions, stillbirths were defined as fetal deaths with a birth weight of ≥500 g. Fresh stillbirths were reclassified as intrapartum, and macerated stillbirths were reclassified as antepartum. Linear regression with cubic splines was used to model trends, and AccessMod software estimated travel times to facilities.

Results: Among recorded births, 5.1% (4873) were stillbirths, with an overall stillbirth rate of 51.3 per 1000 births (95% CI: 27.5 to 93.6). Intrapartum stillbirths accounted for 53.8% (27.6 per 1000 births; 95% CI: 14.4 to 49.8). Fully functional CEmONC facilities reported the highest stillbirth rates, including the National Teaching Hospital (101.7 per 1000 births, 95% CI: 96.8 to 106.8). Approximately 42.8%, 58.9% and 68.3% of women aged 15-49 lived within a 10, 20 and 30 min travel time, respectively, to fully functional CEmONC facilities, where high stillbirth rates were concentrated.

Conclusions: In The Gambia, intrapartum stillbirth rates remain alarmingly high, even in geographically accessible CEmONC facilities. Inadequate documentation of fetal heart rate on admission hampers accurate classification, complicating targeted interventions. Ensuring that EmONC-designated facilities-particularly those providing BEmONC services-are fully functional with essential equipment, trained staff and robust referral systems, while enhancing the timeliness and quality of obstetric care, is crucial to reducing stillbirth rates.

超越距离:冈比亚死胎率与产科急诊和新生儿护理可及性的观察研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Global Health
BMJ Global Health Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.90%
发文量
429
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Global Health is an online Open Access journal from BMJ that focuses on publishing high-quality peer-reviewed content pertinent to individuals engaged in global health, including policy makers, funders, researchers, clinicians, and frontline healthcare workers. The journal encompasses all facets of global health, with a special emphasis on submissions addressing underfunded areas such as non-communicable diseases (NCDs). It welcomes research across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialized studies. The journal also encourages opinionated discussions on controversial topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信