The role of Seladelpar in primary biliary cholangitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Taimoor Ashraf, Omar Abunada, Nandlal Seerani, Kashif Ali, Areej Muhammad, Syeda Lamiya Mir, Syed Adil Mir Shah, Muhammad Hassaan, Vikash Kumar, Waseem Abbas, Simran Bajaj, Asfia Qammar, F N U Deepak, Salih Abdella Yusuf
{"title":"The role of Seladelpar in primary biliary cholangitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Taimoor Ashraf, Omar Abunada, Nandlal Seerani, Kashif Ali, Areej Muhammad, Syeda Lamiya Mir, Syed Adil Mir Shah, Muhammad Hassaan, Vikash Kumar, Waseem Abbas, Simran Bajaj, Asfia Qammar, F N U Deepak, Salih Abdella Yusuf","doi":"10.1186/s12876-025-03812-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is a chronic autoimmune liver disease characterized by progressive bile duct destruction, leading to cholestasis and, if untreated, liver failure. Although ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) remains the first-line treatment, many patients exhibit an inadequate response, necessitating alternative therapeutic options. Seladelpar, a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor delta (PPAR-δ) agonist, has emerged as a promising alternative due to its anti-inflammatory and anti-fibrotic properties.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Seladelpar in patients with PBC. A comprehensive database search was performed to identify studies comparing Seladelpar with placebo. Primary and secondary outcomes, including alkaline phosphatase (ALP) normalization, biochemical response, and adverse events, were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three RCTs, comprising 496 patients, were included. Seladelpar significantly improved ALP normalization and biochemical response compared to placebo. Additionally, it effectively reduced ALP and ALT levels from baseline to follow-up. Adverse events, including abdominal pain and headache, were reported, with a higher incidence observed in the Seladelpar group, while other adverse events showed no significant differences between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Seladelpar appears to be an effective treatment for PBC, demonstrating significant improvements in key liver function markers. While it has shown therapeutic benefits, further research is warranted to evaluate its long-term safety, particularly regarding adverse event incidence, and to determine its efficacy across different dosages.</p>","PeriodicalId":9129,"journal":{"name":"BMC Gastroenterology","volume":"25 1","pages":"224"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11971797/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-025-03812-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is a chronic autoimmune liver disease characterized by progressive bile duct destruction, leading to cholestasis and, if untreated, liver failure. Although ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) remains the first-line treatment, many patients exhibit an inadequate response, necessitating alternative therapeutic options. Seladelpar, a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor delta (PPAR-δ) agonist, has emerged as a promising alternative due to its anti-inflammatory and anti-fibrotic properties.

Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Seladelpar in patients with PBC. A comprehensive database search was performed to identify studies comparing Seladelpar with placebo. Primary and secondary outcomes, including alkaline phosphatase (ALP) normalization, biochemical response, and adverse events, were analyzed.

Results: Three RCTs, comprising 496 patients, were included. Seladelpar significantly improved ALP normalization and biochemical response compared to placebo. Additionally, it effectively reduced ALP and ALT levels from baseline to follow-up. Adverse events, including abdominal pain and headache, were reported, with a higher incidence observed in the Seladelpar group, while other adverse events showed no significant differences between groups.

Conclusion: Seladelpar appears to be an effective treatment for PBC, demonstrating significant improvements in key liver function markers. While it has shown therapeutic benefits, further research is warranted to evaluate its long-term safety, particularly regarding adverse event incidence, and to determine its efficacy across different dosages.

塞拉得巴在原发性胆汁性胆管炎中的作用:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
原发性胆道胆管炎(PBC)是一种慢性自身免疫性肝病,其特征是胆管进行性破坏,导致胆汁淤积,如果不治疗,肝功能衰竭。虽然熊去氧胆酸(UDCA)仍然是一线治疗,但许多患者表现出不充分的反应,需要其他治疗方案。Seladelpar是一种过氧化物酶体增殖物激活受体δ (PPAR-δ)激动剂,由于其抗炎和抗纤维化的特性,已成为一种有前途的替代药物。方法:对随机对照试验(rct)进行系统回顾和荟萃分析,评价塞拉德帕治疗PBC患者的疗效和安全性。进行了全面的数据库搜索,以确定将塞拉德帕与安慰剂进行比较的研究。分析主要和次要结局,包括碱性磷酸酶(ALP)正常化、生化反应和不良事件。结果:纳入3项随机对照试验,共496例患者。与安慰剂相比,Seladelpar显著改善ALP正常化和生化反应。此外,从基线到随访,它有效地降低了ALP和ALT水平。据报道,不良事件包括腹痛和头痛,其中塞拉德帕组发生率较高,而其他不良事件在两组间无显著差异。结论:西拉得帕似乎是一种有效的PBC治疗方法,显示出关键肝功能指标的显着改善。虽然它已显示出治疗益处,但仍有必要进一步研究以评估其长期安全性,特别是不良事件发生率,并确定其在不同剂量下的疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Gastroenterology
BMC Gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
465
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Gastroenterology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信