Feasibility study of using perfusion index to predict the timing of laryngeal mask insertion: an observational study.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Weiwei Cai, Yuting Song, Fei Sun, Huiying Shao, Huanhuan Ni
{"title":"Feasibility study of using perfusion index to predict the timing of laryngeal mask insertion: an observational study.","authors":"Weiwei Cai, Yuting Song, Fei Sun, Huiying Shao, Huanhuan Ni","doi":"10.1186/s12871-025-03024-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Currently, no objective indicators are available to predict the optimal timing for laryngeal mask insertion. Anesthesia depth monitoring devices such as the Bispectral Index (BIS) are not widely applicable for day-surgery patients due to their high cost. Previous literature has reported a correlation between the perfusion index (PI) and the anesthesia depth. Thus, the aim of this study is to verify whether the PI can serve as an indicator for predicting the timing of laryngeal mask insertion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This trial was conducted at a specialized pediatric hospital, with a final enrollment of 164 pediatric patients. After the children entered the room, baseline vital signs and PI<sub>1</sub> were recorded. Three minutes after routine anesthesia induction, PI<sub>2</sub> was recorded, and then a laryngeal mask was inserted. Then children were divided into the body movement group and the non-body movement group. The diagnostic efficacy of PI and the PI ratio for predicting the timing of laryngeal mask insertion were calculated using ROC curves.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for using PI to predict the timing of laryngeal mask insertion was 0.641 (95% confidence interval, 0.542-0.740), P = 0.009, and the cutoff value was 4.37. When PI > 4.37 was used to predict the timing of laryngeal mask insertion, the sensitivity was 53.2%, and the specificity was 73.7%. The AUC for using the PI ratio to predict the timing of laryngeal mask insertion was 0.751 (95% confidence interval, 0.657-0.844), P < 0.001, and the cutoff value was 2.955. When the PI ratio > 2.955 was used to predict the timing of laryngeal mask insertion, the sensitivity was 85.7%, and the specificity was 63.2%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The PI ratio is more suitable than PI alone for predicting the timing of laryngeal mask insertion. When PI increases to three times the baseline PI after induction, laryngeal mask insertion can be considered.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>This trial was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ( https://www.chictr.org.cn . Registration number ChiCTR2400083111, Weiwei Cai, 16 April 2024.).</p>","PeriodicalId":9190,"journal":{"name":"BMC Anesthesiology","volume":"25 1","pages":"156"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11971880/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-025-03024-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Currently, no objective indicators are available to predict the optimal timing for laryngeal mask insertion. Anesthesia depth monitoring devices such as the Bispectral Index (BIS) are not widely applicable for day-surgery patients due to their high cost. Previous literature has reported a correlation between the perfusion index (PI) and the anesthesia depth. Thus, the aim of this study is to verify whether the PI can serve as an indicator for predicting the timing of laryngeal mask insertion.

Methods: This trial was conducted at a specialized pediatric hospital, with a final enrollment of 164 pediatric patients. After the children entered the room, baseline vital signs and PI1 were recorded. Three minutes after routine anesthesia induction, PI2 was recorded, and then a laryngeal mask was inserted. Then children were divided into the body movement group and the non-body movement group. The diagnostic efficacy of PI and the PI ratio for predicting the timing of laryngeal mask insertion were calculated using ROC curves.

Results: The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for using PI to predict the timing of laryngeal mask insertion was 0.641 (95% confidence interval, 0.542-0.740), P = 0.009, and the cutoff value was 4.37. When PI > 4.37 was used to predict the timing of laryngeal mask insertion, the sensitivity was 53.2%, and the specificity was 73.7%. The AUC for using the PI ratio to predict the timing of laryngeal mask insertion was 0.751 (95% confidence interval, 0.657-0.844), P < 0.001, and the cutoff value was 2.955. When the PI ratio > 2.955 was used to predict the timing of laryngeal mask insertion, the sensitivity was 85.7%, and the specificity was 63.2%.

Conclusion: The PI ratio is more suitable than PI alone for predicting the timing of laryngeal mask insertion. When PI increases to three times the baseline PI after induction, laryngeal mask insertion can be considered.

Clinical trial registration: This trial was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ( https://www.chictr.org.cn . Registration number ChiCTR2400083111, Weiwei Cai, 16 April 2024.).

应用灌注指数预测喉罩插入时机的可行性观察研究。
背景:目前,没有客观的指标来预测喉罩插入的最佳时机。麻醉深度监测设备,如双谱指数(BIS),由于其昂贵的价格,并没有广泛应用于日间手术患者。既往文献报道了灌注指数(PI)与麻醉深度之间的相关性。因此,本研究的目的是验证PI是否可以作为预测喉罩插入时间的指标。方法:本试验在一家儿科专科医院进行,最终纳入164名儿科患者。儿童进入房间后,记录基线生命体征和PI1。常规麻醉诱导后3分钟,记录PI2,然后插入喉罩。然后将儿童分为身体运动组和非身体运动组。采用ROC曲线计算PI的诊断效能及PI比值对喉罩插入时间的预测。结果:PI预测喉罩插入时间的ROC曲线下面积(AUC)为0.641(95%可信区间0.542 ~ 0.740),P = 0.009,截止值为4.37。采用PI > 4.37预测喉罩插入时机,敏感性为53.2%,特异性为73.7%。使用PI比值预测喉罩插入时机的AUC为0.751(95%可信区间为0.657-0.844),P为2.955预测喉罩插入时机,敏感性为85.7%,特异性为63.2%。结论:PI比单独PI更适合预测喉罩插入时间。当诱导后PI增加到基线PI的3倍时,可以考虑插入喉罩。临床试验注册:本试验在中国临床试验注册中心注册(https://www.chictr.org.cn)。注册号ChiCTR2400083111,蔡伟伟,2024年4月16日)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Anesthesiology
BMC Anesthesiology ANESTHESIOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
349
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Anesthesiology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of anesthesiology, critical care, perioperative care and pain management, including clinical and experimental research into anesthetic mechanisms, administration and efficacy, technology and monitoring, and associated economic issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信