Distribution pattern of different volumes of ropivacaine in ultrasound-guided intertransverse process block: a randomized, blinded, computed tomography imaging study.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Chao-Wei Wang, Ping Zou, Zu-Xiong Zhang, Mao-Yan Si, Qin-Guo Yi, Li-Fang Zhan
{"title":"Distribution pattern of different volumes of ropivacaine in ultrasound-guided intertransverse process block: a randomized, blinded, computed tomography imaging study.","authors":"Chao-Wei Wang, Ping Zou, Zu-Xiong Zhang, Mao-Yan Si, Qin-Guo Yi, Li-Fang Zhan","doi":"10.1186/s12871-025-03017-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intertransverse process (ITP) blocks showed reliable paravertebral spread in cadaveric studies, but specific distribution patterns, spread pathways, and dose‒effect relationships remain unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the distribution patterns of three different volumes of local anesthetic (LA) in ITP block in living humans using computed tomography.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-five individuals (18-75 years old) were randomized to receive 0.375% ropivacaine with radiopaque contrast agent at doses of 0.3, 0.4, or 0.5 ml/kg. The primary outcome was the distribution of LA in mediastinal compartments (prevascular, visceral, and paravertebral), retro-superior costotransverse ligament space, erector spinae fascia plane, intercostal space, sympathetic ganglion, costotransverse space, intervertebral foramen, lateral recess, and epidural space. The secondary outcomes included intraoperative and postoperative VAS scores, dermatomal sensory loss, block-related adverse events, and the time required for block administration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The spread pattern of local anesthetic after intertransverse process block includes both forward and backward spread. The LA was concentrated in the visceral compartment (77.5%), paravertebral compartment (93.3%), erector spinae fascia plane (97.8%), intercostal space (97.8%), and sympathetic ganglion (88.9%), with occasional spread to other areas. The overall distribution pattern was significantly influenced by patient position (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.07, F. Model = 3.43, P = 0.04) rather than anesthetic volume (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.03, F. Model = 1.60, P = 0.20) and BMI category (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.03, F. Model = 1.36, P = 0.26). The LA was concentrated in the prevascular compartment when the patient position was changed in the prone position (B = 2.45, 95% CI [0.96, 3.95], P = 0.002). There were no differences in secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ITP block causes the LA to predominantly spread to the paravertebral compartment, visceral compartment, intercostal space, sympathetic ganglion, and erector spinae fascia plane. Within the range of volumes studied (0.3, 0.4, and 0.5 ml/kg), increasing the LA volume did not result in a wider distribution range; the overall distribution pattern was primarily influenced by patient positioning.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The trial was registered online on 3 April 2024 in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2400082665).</p>","PeriodicalId":9190,"journal":{"name":"BMC Anesthesiology","volume":"25 1","pages":"155"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11971911/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-025-03017-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Intertransverse process (ITP) blocks showed reliable paravertebral spread in cadaveric studies, but specific distribution patterns, spread pathways, and dose‒effect relationships remain unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the distribution patterns of three different volumes of local anesthetic (LA) in ITP block in living humans using computed tomography.

Methods: Forty-five individuals (18-75 years old) were randomized to receive 0.375% ropivacaine with radiopaque contrast agent at doses of 0.3, 0.4, or 0.5 ml/kg. The primary outcome was the distribution of LA in mediastinal compartments (prevascular, visceral, and paravertebral), retro-superior costotransverse ligament space, erector spinae fascia plane, intercostal space, sympathetic ganglion, costotransverse space, intervertebral foramen, lateral recess, and epidural space. The secondary outcomes included intraoperative and postoperative VAS scores, dermatomal sensory loss, block-related adverse events, and the time required for block administration.

Results: The spread pattern of local anesthetic after intertransverse process block includes both forward and backward spread. The LA was concentrated in the visceral compartment (77.5%), paravertebral compartment (93.3%), erector spinae fascia plane (97.8%), intercostal space (97.8%), and sympathetic ganglion (88.9%), with occasional spread to other areas. The overall distribution pattern was significantly influenced by patient position (R2 = 0.07, F. Model = 3.43, P = 0.04) rather than anesthetic volume (R2 = 0.03, F. Model = 1.60, P = 0.20) and BMI category (R2 = 0.03, F. Model = 1.36, P = 0.26). The LA was concentrated in the prevascular compartment when the patient position was changed in the prone position (B = 2.45, 95% CI [0.96, 3.95], P = 0.002). There were no differences in secondary outcomes.

Conclusions: ITP block causes the LA to predominantly spread to the paravertebral compartment, visceral compartment, intercostal space, sympathetic ganglion, and erector spinae fascia plane. Within the range of volumes studied (0.3, 0.4, and 0.5 ml/kg), increasing the LA volume did not result in a wider distribution range; the overall distribution pattern was primarily influenced by patient positioning.

Trial registration: The trial was registered online on 3 April 2024 in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2400082665).

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Anesthesiology
BMC Anesthesiology ANESTHESIOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
349
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Anesthesiology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of anesthesiology, critical care, perioperative care and pain management, including clinical and experimental research into anesthetic mechanisms, administration and efficacy, technology and monitoring, and associated economic issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信