Comparison of the effectiveness of transversalis fascia plane block and transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative analgesia in pediatric lower abdominal surgeries: prospective, single blinded study.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Hasibe İrban, Can Aksu
{"title":"Comparison of the effectiveness of transversalis fascia plane block and transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative analgesia in pediatric lower abdominal surgeries: prospective, single blinded study.","authors":"Hasibe İrban, Can Aksu","doi":"10.1186/s12871-025-03023-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Achieving adequate postoperative analgesia in the pediatric age group is also important in terms of future pain perception and chronic pain development in the subsequent period. The primary aim of our study was to compare the effects of Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) and Transversalis Fascia Plane (TFP) blocks on pain scores at the 6th postoperative hour in children undergoing lower abdominal surgery. Secondary aims include the observation of pain scores over the first 24 h postoperatively, the duration until the first analgesic requirement, the presence of postoperative nausea and vomiting symptoms, and the satisfaction of parents with the provided analgesia method.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients aged between 1 and 7 years, classified as ASA I-II, who were scheduled for elective surgery for undescended testes and inguinal hernia, were included in our study. The study was designed as a prospective observational study. The patients were divided into two groups: TAP block (n = 42) and TFP block (n = 42). Intraoperative remifentanil consumption, hemodynamic parameters, postoperative FLACC pain scores, analgesic requirements, and the time of the first analgesic need were recorded for 24 h.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 84 patients were included in the study. The groups were similar in terms of demographic data. No difference was found in FLACC pain scores between the groups that received both TAP and TFP blocks in patients followed for 24 h postoperatively (p > 0.05). Intraoperative remifentanil consumption was similar in TAP blocks 74 (20-100) and TFP blocks 40 (24.75-71) µg, (p: 0.268). When calculating based on the first analgesic consumption for TAP and TFP groups, it is found that the median analgesic effect durations were 12 and 9 h, respectively, for the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In children undergoing lower abdominal surgery, ultrasound-guided TAP and TFP blocks have shown similar effects on pain scores and analgesic requirements for 24 h postoperatively. We believe that both blocks, which we found to provide analgesia without the need for opioids after lower abdominal surgery in pediatric patients, can be safely used in this patient group.</p><p><strong>Clinical trials registration: </strong>NCT06530147.</p>","PeriodicalId":9190,"journal":{"name":"BMC Anesthesiology","volume":"25 1","pages":"154"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11971910/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-025-03023-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Achieving adequate postoperative analgesia in the pediatric age group is also important in terms of future pain perception and chronic pain development in the subsequent period. The primary aim of our study was to compare the effects of Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) and Transversalis Fascia Plane (TFP) blocks on pain scores at the 6th postoperative hour in children undergoing lower abdominal surgery. Secondary aims include the observation of pain scores over the first 24 h postoperatively, the duration until the first analgesic requirement, the presence of postoperative nausea and vomiting symptoms, and the satisfaction of parents with the provided analgesia method.

Methods: Patients aged between 1 and 7 years, classified as ASA I-II, who were scheduled for elective surgery for undescended testes and inguinal hernia, were included in our study. The study was designed as a prospective observational study. The patients were divided into two groups: TAP block (n = 42) and TFP block (n = 42). Intraoperative remifentanil consumption, hemodynamic parameters, postoperative FLACC pain scores, analgesic requirements, and the time of the first analgesic need were recorded for 24 h.

Results: A total of 84 patients were included in the study. The groups were similar in terms of demographic data. No difference was found in FLACC pain scores between the groups that received both TAP and TFP blocks in patients followed for 24 h postoperatively (p > 0.05). Intraoperative remifentanil consumption was similar in TAP blocks 74 (20-100) and TFP blocks 40 (24.75-71) µg, (p: 0.268). When calculating based on the first analgesic consumption for TAP and TFP groups, it is found that the median analgesic effect durations were 12 and 9 h, respectively, for the two groups.

Conclusions: In children undergoing lower abdominal surgery, ultrasound-guided TAP and TFP blocks have shown similar effects on pain scores and analgesic requirements for 24 h postoperatively. We believe that both blocks, which we found to provide analgesia without the need for opioids after lower abdominal surgery in pediatric patients, can be safely used in this patient group.

Clinical trials registration: NCT06530147.

腹横筋膜平面阻滞与腹横平面阻滞在小儿下腹部手术术后镇痛效果的比较:前瞻性单盲研究。
背景:在儿童年龄组中实现足够的术后镇痛对于未来的疼痛感知和随后时期的慢性疼痛发展也很重要。本研究的主要目的是比较腹横平面(TAP)和筋膜横平面(TFP)阻滞对接受下腹部手术的儿童术后第6小时疼痛评分的影响。次要目的包括观察术后24小时的疼痛评分,到第一次需要镇痛的时间,术后恶心和呕吐症状的出现,以及父母对所提供的镇痛方法的满意度。方法:年龄1 ~ 7岁,ASA I-II级,计划择期手术治疗隐睾和腹股沟疝的患者纳入我们的研究。本研究为前瞻性观察性研究。患者分为两组:TAP阻断组(n = 42)和TFP阻断组(n = 42)。记录术中瑞芬太尼用量、血流动力学参数、术后FLACC疼痛评分、镇痛需求、首次镇痛时间24 h。结果:共纳入84例患者。这两组在人口统计数据方面是相似的。术后24 h同时接受TAP和TFP阻滞组患者FLACC疼痛评分差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。术中瑞芬太尼用量在TAP区块74(20-100)和TFP区块40(24.75-71)µg中相似,(p: 0.268)。根据TAP组和TFP组的首次镇痛消耗计算,发现两组的中位镇痛持续时间分别为12和9 h。结论:在接受下腹部手术的儿童中,超声引导下的TAP和TFP阻滞对术后24小时疼痛评分和镇痛需求的影响相似。我们认为,这两种阻滞都可以在儿科患者下腹部手术后不需要阿片类药物的情况下提供镇痛,可以安全地用于该患者组。临床试验注册:NCT06530147。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Anesthesiology
BMC Anesthesiology ANESTHESIOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
349
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Anesthesiology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of anesthesiology, critical care, perioperative care and pain management, including clinical and experimental research into anesthetic mechanisms, administration and efficacy, technology and monitoring, and associated economic issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信