An analysis of the value-added of antibiogram subgroup stratification.

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 MICROBIOLOGY
Connie T Y Xie, Samantha Martinez, Ceylon V Simon, Susan M Poutanen
{"title":"An analysis of the value-added of antibiogram subgroup stratification.","authors":"Connie T Y Xie, Samantha Martinez, Ceylon V Simon, Susan M Poutanen","doi":"10.1186/s12941-025-00787-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stratified antibiograms are recommended to guide empiric clinical treatment. However, which strata to focus on, the limited number of isolates in identified strata, and the heavy associated workload all pose challenges. This study compares differences in antibiotic susceptibility between a hospital-wide, all-specimens antibiogram and stratified antibiograms in order to identify the value-added of antibiogram stratification.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Antibiotic susceptibility of bacterial isolates from 2021 at a quaternary-care academic hospital was obtained from published hospital-wide and unit- and specimen-specific stratified antibiograms. Differences in percent susceptibility by organism and drug between the hospital-wide and stratified antibiograms were calculated. Weighted averages of the difference in percent susceptibility were calculated for each stratified antibiogram compared to the hospital-wide antibiogram and unit-wide antibiograms. Differences were shown through heat maps.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>When compared to a hospital-wide, all-specimens antibiogram, the emergency department (ED) antibiogram showed higher susceptibility, whereas the intensive care unit (ICU) and, particularly, the transplant unit antibiograms exhibited reduced susceptibility. Compared to unit level antibiograms, further stratification within each unit to specimen-specific (syndromic) antibiograms revealed additional differences. In the ED, urine and respiratory-stratified antibiograms had lower susceptibility and blood had higher susceptibility. Compared to unit-specific antibiograms, in the ICU, all specimen-stratified antibiograms had lower susceptibility and in the transplant unit, antibiograms for all specimens but urine had lower susceptibility.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Using a hospital-wide all-specimens antibiogram may both overcall and under call susceptibility leading to poor empiric antimicrobial choices. Specimen-specific antibiograms stratified by unit best inform empiric therapy for specific populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":8052,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials","volume":"24 1","pages":"21"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11972497/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12941-025-00787-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Stratified antibiograms are recommended to guide empiric clinical treatment. However, which strata to focus on, the limited number of isolates in identified strata, and the heavy associated workload all pose challenges. This study compares differences in antibiotic susceptibility between a hospital-wide, all-specimens antibiogram and stratified antibiograms in order to identify the value-added of antibiogram stratification.

Method: Antibiotic susceptibility of bacterial isolates from 2021 at a quaternary-care academic hospital was obtained from published hospital-wide and unit- and specimen-specific stratified antibiograms. Differences in percent susceptibility by organism and drug between the hospital-wide and stratified antibiograms were calculated. Weighted averages of the difference in percent susceptibility were calculated for each stratified antibiogram compared to the hospital-wide antibiogram and unit-wide antibiograms. Differences were shown through heat maps.

Results: When compared to a hospital-wide, all-specimens antibiogram, the emergency department (ED) antibiogram showed higher susceptibility, whereas the intensive care unit (ICU) and, particularly, the transplant unit antibiograms exhibited reduced susceptibility. Compared to unit level antibiograms, further stratification within each unit to specimen-specific (syndromic) antibiograms revealed additional differences. In the ED, urine and respiratory-stratified antibiograms had lower susceptibility and blood had higher susceptibility. Compared to unit-specific antibiograms, in the ICU, all specimen-stratified antibiograms had lower susceptibility and in the transplant unit, antibiograms for all specimens but urine had lower susceptibility.

Conclusion: Using a hospital-wide all-specimens antibiogram may both overcall and under call susceptibility leading to poor empiric antimicrobial choices. Specimen-specific antibiograms stratified by unit best inform empiric therapy for specific populations.

抗生素图谱亚组分层增值分析。
背景:建议采用分层抗生素图谱来指导经验性临床治疗。然而,重点关注哪些分层、已确定分层中的分离株数量有限以及相关工作量繁重等问题都带来了挑战。本研究比较了全院所有样本抗生素图谱与分层抗生素图谱在抗生素敏感性方面的差异,以确定抗生素图谱分层的增值作用:方法:从已公布的全院抗生素图谱和针对特定单位和标本的分层抗生素图谱中获取一家四级医疗学术医院 2021 年细菌分离株的抗生素药敏性。计算了全院抗生素图与分层抗生素图之间按菌种和药物划分的药敏百分率差异。计算出每个分层抗生素图与全院抗生素图和单位抗生素图相比的药敏百分率差异的加权平均值。差异通过热图显示:结果:与全院所有样本的抗生素图谱相比,急诊科(ED)的抗生素图谱显示出较高的药敏性,而重症监护室(ICU),尤其是移植病房的抗生素图谱则显示出较低的药敏性。与科室级抗生素图谱相比,在每个科室内按标本特异性(综合征)抗生素图谱进一步分层后发现了更多差异。在急诊室,尿液和呼吸道分层抗生素图谱的药敏性较低,而血液的药敏性较高。在重症监护病房,所有标本分层抗生素图谱的药敏性都较低,而在移植病房,除尿液外,所有标本的抗生素图谱的药敏性都较低:结论:使用全院范围的所有标本抗生素图谱可能会导致药敏性过高或过低,从而导致经验性抗菌药物选择不当。按科室分层的标本抗生素图谱可为特定人群的经验疗法提供最佳信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials considers good quality, novel and international research of more than regional relevance. Research must include epidemiological and/or clinical information about isolates, and the journal covers the clinical microbiology of bacteria, viruses and fungi, as well as antimicrobial treatment of infectious diseases. Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials is an open access, peer-reviewed journal focusing on information concerning clinical microbiology, infectious diseases and antimicrobials. The management of infectious disease is dependent on correct diagnosis and appropriate antimicrobial treatment, and with this in mind, the journal aims to improve the communication between laboratory and clinical science in the field of clinical microbiology and antimicrobial treatment. Furthermore, the journal has no restrictions on space or access; this ensures that the journal can reach the widest possible audience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信