Treatment with methotrexate plus oral prednisolone versus triple therapy (methotrexate/sulfasalazine/hydroxychloroquine) plus intra-articular glucocorticoids in early rheumatoid arthritis: a prespecified nonrandomised subgroup analysis of clinical and radiographic data at 48 weeks from the NORD-STAR trial's conventional treatment arm.

IF 20.3 1区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY
Merete Lund Hetland, Marte S Heiberg, Tuulikki Sokka-Isler, Anna Rudin, Mikkel Østergaard, Espen Haavardsholm, Jarno Rutanen, Ronald van Vollenhoven, Gerdur Grondal, Lykke Midtbøll Ørnbjerg, Pernille Bøyesen, Jon Lampa, Michael Nurmohamed, Bjorn Gudbjornsson, Till Uhlig, Aulikki Kononoff, Kristina Lend, Simon Krabbe, Inge C Olsen, Joe Sexton, Kim Hørslev-Petersen
{"title":"Treatment with methotrexate plus oral prednisolone versus triple therapy (methotrexate/sulfasalazine/hydroxychloroquine) plus intra-articular glucocorticoids in early rheumatoid arthritis: a prespecified nonrandomised subgroup analysis of clinical and radiographic data at 48 weeks from the NORD-STAR trial's conventional treatment arm.","authors":"Merete Lund Hetland, Marte S Heiberg, Tuulikki Sokka-Isler, Anna Rudin, Mikkel Østergaard, Espen Haavardsholm, Jarno Rutanen, Ronald van Vollenhoven, Gerdur Grondal, Lykke Midtbøll Ørnbjerg, Pernille Bøyesen, Jon Lampa, Michael Nurmohamed, Bjorn Gudbjornsson, Till Uhlig, Aulikki Kononoff, Kristina Lend, Simon Krabbe, Inge C Olsen, Joe Sexton, Kim Hørslev-Petersen","doi":"10.1016/j.ard.2025.03.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In the NOrdic Rheumatic Diseases Strategy Trials And Registries (NORD-STAR) trial, the active conventional arm had 2 nonrandomised regimens: arm 1A (oral group; Sweden, Norway, Netherlands, and Iceland) and arm 1B (injection group; Denmark and Finland). We report clinical, patient-reported, safety, and radiographic outcomes after 48 weeks.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Oral group received methotrexate plus oral prednisolone (20.0 mg/d, tapered rapidly, discontinued week 36); Injection group received triple therapy (methotrexate, sulphasalazine, hydroxychloroquine) and mandatory intra-articular glucocorticoid injections. The primary end point was analysed by logistic regression with several approaches for handling missing outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 137 and 80 patients were included in the oral group and injection group; 78% vs. 89% completed, respectively. At 48 weeks, adjusted clinical disease activity index remission ≤2.8 rates (95% CI) were 36% (28-44) and 55% (42-68), respectively; the risk difference (primary outcome) was 19% (2-35). Similarly, key secondary clinical, patient-reported and safety outcomes showed numerically better results in the injection group vs oral group, for example, infections occurred in 53% vs 30%, respectively. Radiographic progression (Δtotal van der Heijde-modified Sharp Score) was low: oral group: adjusted mean, 0.26 (95% CI, 0.08-0.43); injection group: adjustedd mean, 0.80 (95% CI, 0.55-1.05). Cumulative dose of oral/intra-articular glucocorticoids (median) was 1905 mg prednisolone for the oral group and 165 mg for the injection group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In treatment-naïve patients with early rheumatoid arthritis, triple therapy and mandatory glucocorticoid joint injections had numerically better clinical outcomes, fewer withdrawals, fewer adverse events, and lower cumulative dose of glucocorticoids, but slightly worse radiographic outcomes than treatment with methotrexate and oral prednisolone. These findings, although nonrandomised, suggest a potential for optimising treatment strategy with conventional therapies in early rheumatoid arthritis.</p>","PeriodicalId":8087,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":20.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ard.2025.03.002","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: In the NOrdic Rheumatic Diseases Strategy Trials And Registries (NORD-STAR) trial, the active conventional arm had 2 nonrandomised regimens: arm 1A (oral group; Sweden, Norway, Netherlands, and Iceland) and arm 1B (injection group; Denmark and Finland). We report clinical, patient-reported, safety, and radiographic outcomes after 48 weeks.

Methods: Oral group received methotrexate plus oral prednisolone (20.0 mg/d, tapered rapidly, discontinued week 36); Injection group received triple therapy (methotrexate, sulphasalazine, hydroxychloroquine) and mandatory intra-articular glucocorticoid injections. The primary end point was analysed by logistic regression with several approaches for handling missing outcomes.

Results: In total, 137 and 80 patients were included in the oral group and injection group; 78% vs. 89% completed, respectively. At 48 weeks, adjusted clinical disease activity index remission ≤2.8 rates (95% CI) were 36% (28-44) and 55% (42-68), respectively; the risk difference (primary outcome) was 19% (2-35). Similarly, key secondary clinical, patient-reported and safety outcomes showed numerically better results in the injection group vs oral group, for example, infections occurred in 53% vs 30%, respectively. Radiographic progression (Δtotal van der Heijde-modified Sharp Score) was low: oral group: adjusted mean, 0.26 (95% CI, 0.08-0.43); injection group: adjustedd mean, 0.80 (95% CI, 0.55-1.05). Cumulative dose of oral/intra-articular glucocorticoids (median) was 1905 mg prednisolone for the oral group and 165 mg for the injection group.

Conclusions: In treatment-naïve patients with early rheumatoid arthritis, triple therapy and mandatory glucocorticoid joint injections had numerically better clinical outcomes, fewer withdrawals, fewer adverse events, and lower cumulative dose of glucocorticoids, but slightly worse radiographic outcomes than treatment with methotrexate and oral prednisolone. These findings, although nonrandomised, suggest a potential for optimising treatment strategy with conventional therapies in early rheumatoid arthritis.

试验目的在诺迪克风湿病战略试验和登记处(NORD-STAR)试验中,积极的常规治疗组有两种非随机疗法:1A组(口服组;瑞典、挪威、荷兰和冰岛)和1B组(注射组;丹麦和芬兰)。我们报告了 48 周后的临床、患者报告、安全性和放射学结果:口服组接受甲氨蝶呤加口服泼尼松龙(20.0 毫克/天,迅速减量,第 36 周停药);注射组接受三联疗法(甲氨蝶呤、柳氮磺胺吡啶、羟氯喹)和强制性关节内糖皮质激素注射。主要终点通过逻辑回归进行分析,并采用多种方法处理缺失结果:口服组和注射组分别共有 137 名和 80 名患者,完成率分别为 78% 和 89%。48周时,调整后的临床疾病活动指数缓解率≤2.8(95% CI)分别为36%(28-44)和55%(42-68);风险差异(主要结果)为19%(2-35)。同样,主要的次要临床、患者报告和安全性结果显示,注射组与口服组相比,在数字上有更好的结果,例如,发生感染的比例分别为 53% 和 30%。放射学进展(Δtotal van der Heijde-modified Sharp Score)较低:口服组:调整后平均值为 0.26(95% CI,0.08-0.43);注射组:调整后平均值为 0.80(95% CI,0.55-1.05)。口服组和注射组的口服/关节内糖皮质激素累积剂量(中位数)分别为 1905 毫克泼尼松龙和 165 毫克:结论:与使用甲氨蝶呤和口服泼尼松龙治疗相比,在早期类风湿关节炎的治疗新患者中,三联疗法和强制性糖皮质激素关节注射的临床疗效更好、撤药更少、不良反应更少、糖皮质激素的累积剂量更低,但放射学疗效稍差。这些研究结果虽然不是随机得出的,但表明在早期类风湿关节炎的治疗中,采用传统疗法有可能优化治疗策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
35.00
自引率
9.90%
发文量
3728
审稿时长
1.4 months
期刊介绍: Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases (ARD) is an international peer-reviewed journal covering all aspects of rheumatology, which includes the full spectrum of musculoskeletal conditions, arthritic disease, and connective tissue disorders. ARD publishes basic, clinical, and translational scientific research, including the most important recommendations for the management of various conditions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信