Can the Moon's Center of Mass–Center of Figure Offset Be Explained With a Uniform Primordial Crust?

IF 3.9 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Matt J. Jones, Fiona Nichols-Fleming, Alexander J. Evans, Brandon C. Johnson, Jeffrey C. Andrews-Hanna
{"title":"Can the Moon's Center of Mass–Center of Figure Offset Be Explained With a Uniform Primordial Crust?","authors":"Matt J. Jones,&nbsp;Fiona Nichols-Fleming,&nbsp;Alexander J. Evans,&nbsp;Brandon C. Johnson,&nbsp;Jeffrey C. Andrews-Hanna","doi":"10.1029/2024JE008783","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A fundamental constraint on the Moon's interior mass distribution is the 1.935-km lunar center of mass (COM)–center of figure (COF) offset. Extant constraints on the mass asymmetry that generates the COM-COF offset—commonly attributed to a crustal thickness asymmetry wherein the nearside crust is thinner than that of the farside—do not permit a unique solution for the lunar interior structure. Using simple analytical models of isostasy and porosity evolution, we quantify potential contributions to the lunar mass asymmetry from nearside-farside asymmetries (specifically, spherical harmonic degree-1 variations) in porosity, crustal basalts, and dense late-stage magma ocean cumulates. We demonstrate that these asymmetries could simultaneously explain the COM-COF offset and allow for a lunar crust that formed with globally uniform thickness and porosity. Scenarios with an excess of ∼10–44 km of late-stage cumulates in the nearside relative to the farside allow for full ranges of 5%–12% nearside anorthosite porosity, 1–2 km of excess nearside basalts, and nearside crustal thickness of either 30 km or 38 km. Furthermore, under specific conditions (30-km nearside crust with low porosity and high late-stage cumulate density of ∼3,600 kg/m<sup>3</sup>), the COM-COF offset permits an initially uniform crust as well as a present-day crust with uniform thickness. While observational constraints do not favor perfectly symmetric present-day crustal thickness, our analyses highlight the importance of higher fidelity characterization of the lunar interior structure and the use of caution in investigations that fundamentally rely on lunar crustal thickness constraints.</p>","PeriodicalId":16101,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets","volume":"130 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JE008783","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A fundamental constraint on the Moon's interior mass distribution is the 1.935-km lunar center of mass (COM)–center of figure (COF) offset. Extant constraints on the mass asymmetry that generates the COM-COF offset—commonly attributed to a crustal thickness asymmetry wherein the nearside crust is thinner than that of the farside—do not permit a unique solution for the lunar interior structure. Using simple analytical models of isostasy and porosity evolution, we quantify potential contributions to the lunar mass asymmetry from nearside-farside asymmetries (specifically, spherical harmonic degree-1 variations) in porosity, crustal basalts, and dense late-stage magma ocean cumulates. We demonstrate that these asymmetries could simultaneously explain the COM-COF offset and allow for a lunar crust that formed with globally uniform thickness and porosity. Scenarios with an excess of ∼10–44 km of late-stage cumulates in the nearside relative to the farside allow for full ranges of 5%–12% nearside anorthosite porosity, 1–2 km of excess nearside basalts, and nearside crustal thickness of either 30 km or 38 km. Furthermore, under specific conditions (30-km nearside crust with low porosity and high late-stage cumulate density of ∼3,600 kg/m3), the COM-COF offset permits an initially uniform crust as well as a present-day crust with uniform thickness. While observational constraints do not favor perfectly symmetric present-day crustal thickness, our analyses highlight the importance of higher fidelity characterization of the lunar interior structure and the use of caution in investigations that fundamentally rely on lunar crustal thickness constraints.

月球的质心偏移是否可以用一个均匀的原始地壳来解释?
月球内部质量分布的一个基本限制是1.935公里的月球质心(COM) -图心(COF)偏移。产生COM-COF偏移的质量不对称(通常归因于地壳厚度不对称,即近端地壳比远端地壳薄)的现有限制,不允许对月球内部结构有一个唯一的解决方案。利用均衡和孔隙演化的简单分析模型,我们量化了孔隙度、地壳玄武岩和致密的晚期岩浆海洋堆积的近-远侧不对称(特别是球面调和度-1变化)对月球质量不对称的潜在贡献。我们证明这些不对称可以同时解释COM-COF偏移,并允许形成具有全球均匀厚度和孔隙度的月球地壳。相对于远侧,近侧晚期累积物超过~ 10-44 km的情景允许近侧斜长岩孔隙度为5%-12%,近侧玄武岩超过1-2 km,近侧地壳厚度为30 km或38 km。此外,在特定条件下(30公里的近侧地壳,低孔隙度,后期高累积密度,约3,600 kg/m3), COM-COF偏移量允许最初均匀的地壳以及均匀厚度的现今地壳。虽然观测约束条件并不支持完全对称的现今地壳厚度,但我们的分析强调了对月球内部结构进行更高保真度表征的重要性,以及在基本上依赖于月球地壳厚度约束条件的研究中谨慎使用的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets
Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets Earth and Planetary Sciences-Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
27.10%
发文量
254
期刊介绍: The Journal of Geophysical Research Planets is dedicated to the publication of new and original research in the broad field of planetary science. Manuscripts concerning planetary geology, geophysics, geochemistry, atmospheres, and dynamics are appropriate for the journal when they increase knowledge about the processes that affect Solar System objects. Manuscripts concerning other planetary systems, exoplanets or Earth are welcome when presented in a comparative planetology perspective. Studies in the field of astrobiology will be considered when they have immediate consequences for the interpretation of planetary data. JGR: Planets does not publish manuscripts that deal with future missions and instrumentation, nor those that are primarily of an engineering interest. Instrument, calibration or data processing papers may be appropriate for the journal, but only when accompanied by scientific analysis and interpretation that increases understanding of the studied object. A manuscript that describes a new method or technique would be acceptable for JGR: Planets if it contained new and relevant scientific results obtained using the method. Review articles are generally not appropriate for JGR: Planets, but they may be considered if they form an integral part of a special issue.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信