Impact of an evidence-based sepsis pathway on paediatric hospital clinical practice: A quality improvement study

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Bernard McCarthy MBChB, FRACP, Paediatric Emergency Physician, Natalie Middleton MCN, GradCert ClinNurs – PaedICU, BN, Fenella J Gill FACCCN, GradCert Tert Teach, Paed Cert, MN, BN PhD, RN, Zoy Goff PGDipClin Pharm, BPharm, Zoe Paterson, Christopher C Blyth PhD, FRACP, FRCPA, MBBS, the CAHS Sepsis Working Group
{"title":"Impact of an evidence-based sepsis pathway on paediatric hospital clinical practice: A quality improvement study","authors":"Bernard McCarthy MBChB, FRACP, Paediatric Emergency Physician,&nbsp;Natalie Middleton MCN, GradCert ClinNurs – PaedICU, BN,&nbsp;Fenella J Gill FACCCN, GradCert Tert Teach, Paed Cert, MN, BN PhD, RN,&nbsp;Zoy Goff PGDipClin Pharm, BPharm,&nbsp;Zoe Paterson,&nbsp;Christopher C Blyth PhD, FRACP, FRCPA, MBBS,&nbsp;the CAHS Sepsis Working Group","doi":"10.1111/1742-6723.70036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>To assess the impact of implementing a sepsis pathway and education program on key sepsis outcomes and performance targets in a tertiary paediatric hospital.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A quality improvement study using a multi-modal screening process and pragmatic clinical definitions. Treatment of all children with septic shock and sepsis without shock 4 months prior to pathway/education package launch was compared with those meeting definitions 8 months post-launch.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Over the study period, 1483 episodes were screened; 517 episodes met study definitions (171 pre-launch; 346 post-launch). Eighty-two episodes met septic shock definitions (15.9%) and 435 met sepsis without shock definitions (84.1%). A total of 143 episodes pre-launch and 271 episodes post-launch were managed exclusively at Perth Children's Hospital (PCH). Post intervention, the pathway form was utilised in 146 of 271 episodes (53.9%). Pathway/education package introduction was associated with a reduction in the median time from recognition to antibiotic administration (60 [IQR: 26; 115] to 45 min [IQR: 16; 75] for those with septic shock and/or sepsis without shock treated exclusively at PCH; <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001). The proportion receiving antibiotic therapy within recommended timeframes significantly increased (septic shock within 60 min: 70.0% to 92.5%, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.03; sepsis without shock within 180 min; 86.2% to 94.8%, <i>P</i> = 0.005). No statistically significant change in length of stay, intensive care admission, mortality or antibiotic consumption was observed following pathway launch.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Paediatric sepsis pathway and education package implementation can reduce time to antibiotics in sepsis and aid local data collection and surveillance of patients treated for sepsis.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11604,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Australasia","volume":"37 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1742-6723.70036","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Medicine Australasia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1742-6723.70036","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To assess the impact of implementing a sepsis pathway and education program on key sepsis outcomes and performance targets in a tertiary paediatric hospital.

Methods

A quality improvement study using a multi-modal screening process and pragmatic clinical definitions. Treatment of all children with septic shock and sepsis without shock 4 months prior to pathway/education package launch was compared with those meeting definitions 8 months post-launch.

Results

Over the study period, 1483 episodes were screened; 517 episodes met study definitions (171 pre-launch; 346 post-launch). Eighty-two episodes met septic shock definitions (15.9%) and 435 met sepsis without shock definitions (84.1%). A total of 143 episodes pre-launch and 271 episodes post-launch were managed exclusively at Perth Children's Hospital (PCH). Post intervention, the pathway form was utilised in 146 of 271 episodes (53.9%). Pathway/education package introduction was associated with a reduction in the median time from recognition to antibiotic administration (60 [IQR: 26; 115] to 45 min [IQR: 16; 75] for those with septic shock and/or sepsis without shock treated exclusively at PCH; P < 0.001). The proportion receiving antibiotic therapy within recommended timeframes significantly increased (septic shock within 60 min: 70.0% to 92.5%, P < 0.03; sepsis without shock within 180 min; 86.2% to 94.8%, P = 0.005). No statistically significant change in length of stay, intensive care admission, mortality or antibiotic consumption was observed following pathway launch.

Conclusions

Paediatric sepsis pathway and education package implementation can reduce time to antibiotics in sepsis and aid local data collection and surveillance of patients treated for sepsis.

Abstract Image

循证脓毒症途径对儿科医院临床实践的影响:一项质量改进研究
目的评估三级儿科医院实施脓毒症途径和教育计划对脓毒症主要结局和绩效目标的影响。方法采用多模式筛选过程和实用的临床定义进行质量改进研究。比较途径/教育包启动前4个月所有脓毒性休克和无休克的脓毒症儿童的治疗情况,这些儿童在启动后8个月符合定义。结果在研究期间,筛查了1483例;517集符合研究定义(开播前171集;346年投放市场)。82例符合脓毒症休克定义(15.9%),435例符合无休克定义的脓毒症(84.1%)。总共有143集发布前和271集发布后由珀斯儿童医院(PCH)独家管理。干预后,271例患者中有146例(53.9%)采用通路形式。途径/教育包的引入与从识别到抗生素给药的中位时间缩短有关(60 [IQR: 26;[115]至45分钟[IQR: 16;[75]仅在PCH治疗的脓毒性休克和/或无休克的脓毒症患者;P < 0.001)。在推荐时间内接受抗生素治疗的比例显著增加(60分钟内感染性休克:70.0% ~ 92.5%,P < 0.03;180min内无休克的脓毒症;86.2%对94.8%,P = 0.005)。在途径启动后,住院时间、重症监护入院、死亡率或抗生素用量没有统计学上显著的变化。结论儿科脓毒症途径和教育包的实施可以减少脓毒症患者使用抗生素的时间,并有助于当地脓毒症患者的数据收集和监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Emergency Medicine Australasia
Emergency Medicine Australasia 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
13.00%
发文量
217
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Emergency Medicine Australasia is the official journal of the Australasian College for Emergency Medicine (ACEM) and the Australasian Society for Emergency Medicine (ASEM), and publishes original articles dealing with all aspects of clinical practice, research, education and experiences in emergency medicine. Original articles are published under the following sections: Original Research, Paediatric Emergency Medicine, Disaster Medicine, Education and Training, Ethics, International Emergency Medicine, Management and Quality, Medicolegal Matters, Prehospital Care, Public Health, Rural and Remote Care, Technology, Toxicology and Trauma. Accepted papers become the copyright of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信