Impact of an evidence-based sepsis pathway on paediatric hospital clinical practice: A quality improvement study

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Bernard McCarthy MBChB, FRACP, Paediatric Emergency Physician, Natalie Middleton MCN, GradCert ClinNurs – PaedICU, BN, Fenella J Gill FACCCN, GradCert Tert Teach, Paed Cert, MN, BN PhD, RN, Zoy Goff PGDipClin Pharm, BPharm, Zoe Paterson, Christopher C Blyth PhD, FRACP, FRCPA, MBBS, the CAHS Sepsis Working Group
{"title":"Impact of an evidence-based sepsis pathway on paediatric hospital clinical practice: A quality improvement study","authors":"Bernard McCarthy MBChB, FRACP, Paediatric Emergency Physician,&nbsp;Natalie Middleton MCN, GradCert ClinNurs – PaedICU, BN,&nbsp;Fenella J Gill FACCCN, GradCert Tert Teach, Paed Cert, MN, BN PhD, RN,&nbsp;Zoy Goff PGDipClin Pharm, BPharm,&nbsp;Zoe Paterson,&nbsp;Christopher C Blyth PhD, FRACP, FRCPA, MBBS,&nbsp;the CAHS Sepsis Working Group","doi":"10.1111/1742-6723.70036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>To assess the impact of implementing a sepsis pathway and education program on key sepsis outcomes and performance targets in a tertiary paediatric hospital.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A quality improvement study using a multi-modal screening process and pragmatic clinical definitions. Treatment of all children with septic shock and sepsis without shock 4 months prior to pathway/education package launch was compared with those meeting definitions 8 months post-launch.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Over the study period, 1483 episodes were screened; 517 episodes met study definitions (171 pre-launch; 346 post-launch). Eighty-two episodes met septic shock definitions (15.9%) and 435 met sepsis without shock definitions (84.1%). A total of 143 episodes pre-launch and 271 episodes post-launch were managed exclusively at Perth Children's Hospital (PCH). Post intervention, the pathway form was utilised in 146 of 271 episodes (53.9%). Pathway/education package introduction was associated with a reduction in the median time from recognition to antibiotic administration (60 [IQR: 26; 115] to 45 min [IQR: 16; 75] for those with septic shock and/or sepsis without shock treated exclusively at PCH; <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001). The proportion receiving antibiotic therapy within recommended timeframes significantly increased (septic shock within 60 min: 70.0% to 92.5%, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.03; sepsis without shock within 180 min; 86.2% to 94.8%, <i>P</i> = 0.005). No statistically significant change in length of stay, intensive care admission, mortality or antibiotic consumption was observed following pathway launch.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Paediatric sepsis pathway and education package implementation can reduce time to antibiotics in sepsis and aid local data collection and surveillance of patients treated for sepsis.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11604,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Australasia","volume":"37 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1742-6723.70036","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Medicine Australasia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1742-6723.70036","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To assess the impact of implementing a sepsis pathway and education program on key sepsis outcomes and performance targets in a tertiary paediatric hospital.

Methods

A quality improvement study using a multi-modal screening process and pragmatic clinical definitions. Treatment of all children with septic shock and sepsis without shock 4 months prior to pathway/education package launch was compared with those meeting definitions 8 months post-launch.

Results

Over the study period, 1483 episodes were screened; 517 episodes met study definitions (171 pre-launch; 346 post-launch). Eighty-two episodes met septic shock definitions (15.9%) and 435 met sepsis without shock definitions (84.1%). A total of 143 episodes pre-launch and 271 episodes post-launch were managed exclusively at Perth Children's Hospital (PCH). Post intervention, the pathway form was utilised in 146 of 271 episodes (53.9%). Pathway/education package introduction was associated with a reduction in the median time from recognition to antibiotic administration (60 [IQR: 26; 115] to 45 min [IQR: 16; 75] for those with septic shock and/or sepsis without shock treated exclusively at PCH; P < 0.001). The proportion receiving antibiotic therapy within recommended timeframes significantly increased (septic shock within 60 min: 70.0% to 92.5%, P < 0.03; sepsis without shock within 180 min; 86.2% to 94.8%, P = 0.005). No statistically significant change in length of stay, intensive care admission, mortality or antibiotic consumption was observed following pathway launch.

Conclusions

Paediatric sepsis pathway and education package implementation can reduce time to antibiotics in sepsis and aid local data collection and surveillance of patients treated for sepsis.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Emergency Medicine Australasia
Emergency Medicine Australasia 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
13.00%
发文量
217
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Emergency Medicine Australasia is the official journal of the Australasian College for Emergency Medicine (ACEM) and the Australasian Society for Emergency Medicine (ASEM), and publishes original articles dealing with all aspects of clinical practice, research, education and experiences in emergency medicine. Original articles are published under the following sections: Original Research, Paediatric Emergency Medicine, Disaster Medicine, Education and Training, Ethics, International Emergency Medicine, Management and Quality, Medicolegal Matters, Prehospital Care, Public Health, Rural and Remote Care, Technology, Toxicology and Trauma. Accepted papers become the copyright of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信