Exploring the Prevalence and Predictors of Persistently High Primary Care Use Among National Health Insurance Patients in a Nigerian Medical Facility

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Godpower Chinedu Michael, Zainab Abdulazeez Umar, Bukar Alhaji Grema
{"title":"Exploring the Prevalence and Predictors of Persistently High Primary Care Use Among National Health Insurance Patients in a Nigerian Medical Facility","authors":"Godpower Chinedu Michael,&nbsp;Zainab Abdulazeez Umar,&nbsp;Bukar Alhaji Grema","doi":"10.1111/jep.70081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Rationale</h3>\n \n <p>A small group of healthcare users make frequent hospital visits (≥ 10 annually) and consume a disproportionate amount of healthcare resources. Their characteristics among insured patients in developing countries like Nigeria are poorly understood.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>To assess the prevalence and predictors of persistently high primary care (PHPC) use (≥ 10 visits in two consecutive years) among National Health Insurance Authority (NHIA) enrollees.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This retrospective cross-sectional study analyzed data from 380 randomly selected patients at the NHIA Clinic of a Nigerian tertiary hospital in 2022. Using a standardized proforma, their 2018 and 2019 data were collected, including biodata, clinic visit characteristics, diagnoses, and costs of medicines and investigations.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The sample population was predominantly females (62.6%) with a mean age of 37.5 years. In 2018/2019, 75% (285/380) of patients visited for infectious diseases and 37.6% (143/380) for cardiovascular diseases (CVD). Only 2.6% (10/380) were PHPC users. The median cost of care was higher among PHPC users than the remaining users in 2018 (₦30,549.00 [US$84.60] vs. ₦10,290.00 [US$28.50]; Mann Whitney test [MWT] = 16.73, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and in 2019 (₦41,238.50[US$114.20] vs. ₦9,523.50 [US$26.40]; MWT = 18.81, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Older age, tribe, and having CVD were significantly associated with PHPC use, with CVD being a strong predictor (OR = 11.38, <i>p</i> = 0.037).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The prevalence of PHPC users was low, yet they consumed 3 to 4 times more resources in medicines and investigations than the other remaining patients. Patients with CVDs could form targets for interventions to reduce unnecessary visits and lower cost of care.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","volume":"31 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.70081","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale

A small group of healthcare users make frequent hospital visits (≥ 10 annually) and consume a disproportionate amount of healthcare resources. Their characteristics among insured patients in developing countries like Nigeria are poorly understood.

Objectives

To assess the prevalence and predictors of persistently high primary care (PHPC) use (≥ 10 visits in two consecutive years) among National Health Insurance Authority (NHIA) enrollees.

Methods

This retrospective cross-sectional study analyzed data from 380 randomly selected patients at the NHIA Clinic of a Nigerian tertiary hospital in 2022. Using a standardized proforma, their 2018 and 2019 data were collected, including biodata, clinic visit characteristics, diagnoses, and costs of medicines and investigations.

Results

The sample population was predominantly females (62.6%) with a mean age of 37.5 years. In 2018/2019, 75% (285/380) of patients visited for infectious diseases and 37.6% (143/380) for cardiovascular diseases (CVD). Only 2.6% (10/380) were PHPC users. The median cost of care was higher among PHPC users than the remaining users in 2018 (₦30,549.00 [US$84.60] vs. ₦10,290.00 [US$28.50]; Mann Whitney test [MWT] = 16.73, p < 0.001) and in 2019 (₦41,238.50[US$114.20] vs. ₦9,523.50 [US$26.40]; MWT = 18.81, p < 0.001). Older age, tribe, and having CVD were significantly associated with PHPC use, with CVD being a strong predictor (OR = 11.38, p = 0.037).

Conclusion

The prevalence of PHPC users was low, yet they consumed 3 to 4 times more resources in medicines and investigations than the other remaining patients. Patients with CVDs could form targets for interventions to reduce unnecessary visits and lower cost of care.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
143
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice aims to promote the evaluation and development of clinical practice across medicine, nursing and the allied health professions. All aspects of health services research and public health policy analysis and debate are of interest to the Journal whether studied from a population-based or individual patient-centred perspective. Of particular interest to the Journal are submissions on all aspects of clinical effectiveness and efficiency including evidence-based medicine, clinical practice guidelines, clinical decision making, clinical services organisation, implementation and delivery, health economic evaluation, health process and outcome measurement and new or improved methods (conceptual and statistical) for systematic inquiry into clinical practice. Papers may take a classical quantitative or qualitative approach to investigation (or may utilise both techniques) or may take the form of learned essays, structured/systematic reviews and critiques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信