Spot-optimization reduces beam delivery time in liver breath hold intensity modulated proton therapy

IF 3.4 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Michael Butkus , Daniel Bastawros , Yunze Yang , Roberto Cassetta , Roni Hytonen , Robert Kaderka
{"title":"Spot-optimization reduces beam delivery time in liver breath hold intensity modulated proton therapy","authors":"Michael Butkus ,&nbsp;Daniel Bastawros ,&nbsp;Yunze Yang ,&nbsp;Roberto Cassetta ,&nbsp;Roni Hytonen ,&nbsp;Robert Kaderka","doi":"10.1016/j.phro.2025.100763","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><div>Liver irradiations with intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) often require motion mitigation techniques that prolong treatment. A prototype spot-optimization algorithm was tested to evaluate whether plan delivery time could be reduced while preserving quality.</div></div><div><h3>Methods and materials</h3><div>Fifteen patients previously treated with liver IMPT using breath-hold were re-planned with nominal treatment planning system (TPS) settings and using a prototype spot-optimization algorithm in which combinations of minimum Monitor Unit (MU) and layer-spacing settings were tested: 1MU/1MeV, 3MU/3MeV, 1MU/5MeV, 5MU/3MeV. Spot-optimized and nominals plans were compared using standard dose-volume histogram (DVH) metrics for targets and organs-at-risk. A Wilcoxon signed-rank test was applied (p &lt; 0.05). Delivery time for all plans were measured by creating and delivering IMPT quality assurance (QA) plans. Gamma analyses were performed on all plans to test deliverability. Plans were considered deliverable if &gt;90 % of points passed a gamma criterion of 3 %/3mm.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Minimal DVH differences were observed between nominal and spot-optimized plans. For the 3MU/3MeV setting, no DVH metrics were significantly different. Median and interquartile range (IQR) delivery times for these plans were 40 % (38 %<strong>–</strong>44 %) faster than nominal plans. 5MU/3MeV plans had median (IQR) delivery times 59 % (52 %<strong>–</strong>61 %) faster than nominal plans but had a small but significant increase in Liver<sub>Eff</sub> D<sub>mean</sub> with a median (IQR) difference of 0.2 Gy(RBE) (0.0<strong>–</strong>0.4 Gy(RBE)). QA analysis showed all spot-optimized plans were deliverable.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The spot-optimization algorithm produced clinically deliverable plans with negligible DVH differences to nominal plans and reduced delivery time of liver IMPT by over one-third.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36850,"journal":{"name":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","volume":"34 ","pages":"Article 100763"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631625000685","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose

Liver irradiations with intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) often require motion mitigation techniques that prolong treatment. A prototype spot-optimization algorithm was tested to evaluate whether plan delivery time could be reduced while preserving quality.

Methods and materials

Fifteen patients previously treated with liver IMPT using breath-hold were re-planned with nominal treatment planning system (TPS) settings and using a prototype spot-optimization algorithm in which combinations of minimum Monitor Unit (MU) and layer-spacing settings were tested: 1MU/1MeV, 3MU/3MeV, 1MU/5MeV, 5MU/3MeV. Spot-optimized and nominals plans were compared using standard dose-volume histogram (DVH) metrics for targets and organs-at-risk. A Wilcoxon signed-rank test was applied (p < 0.05). Delivery time for all plans were measured by creating and delivering IMPT quality assurance (QA) plans. Gamma analyses were performed on all plans to test deliverability. Plans were considered deliverable if >90 % of points passed a gamma criterion of 3 %/3mm.

Results

Minimal DVH differences were observed between nominal and spot-optimized plans. For the 3MU/3MeV setting, no DVH metrics were significantly different. Median and interquartile range (IQR) delivery times for these plans were 40 % (38 %44 %) faster than nominal plans. 5MU/3MeV plans had median (IQR) delivery times 59 % (52 %61 %) faster than nominal plans but had a small but significant increase in LiverEff Dmean with a median (IQR) difference of 0.2 Gy(RBE) (0.00.4 Gy(RBE)). QA analysis showed all spot-optimized plans were deliverable.

Conclusions

The spot-optimization algorithm produced clinically deliverable plans with negligible DVH differences to nominal plans and reduced delivery time of liver IMPT by over one-third.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology Physics and Astronomy-Radiation
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
18.90%
发文量
93
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信